Maybe before they can't get to the stadiums (because the roads and
bridges are impassable) to watch the "SHOW" they'll figure it out. I
guess the real sports fanatics will just watch from their recliners
while Rome burns. Oh shit they're already done that; haven't they?

Peace,
Doc

On Mar 27, 9:41 am, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> Infrastructure shows that government should be abolished.  It is a prime
> example of government failure
>
> During the past decades local governments had huge influxes of revenue from
> property and income taxes
>
> In DC, a city that has only had Dewmit mayors and city councils, we have a
> new convention center and sports stadium, but government water authority
> pipes are all lead and recent studies show DC children have permanent brain
> damage.  We have many public schools with only one working restroom and
> asbestos throughout, though teachers and non-teaching bureaucrats have the
> highest salaries in the country.
>
> It is a clear example of the failure of government and of central planning
> and of the absence of consumer choice and the profit motive.
>
> They built baseball stadiums and convention centers, raised their salaries
> and expanded their bureaucracies, but did not spend money on basic
> maintenance of bridges and roads, leading to many deaths
>
> A private bridge or road owner would take better care of their assets.  They
> would have to to get customers, loans, or insurance
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:45 AM, madtim3bat <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >   America's infrastructure is falling apart. The Republicans demands that
> > we cut infrastructure is just insane. We are turning into a third world
> > nation, and Republicans are complaining that we are not doing it fast
> > enough.
>
> > We need stimulus, and we have collapsing infrastructure... Am I the only
> > one who sees an opportunity in these twin disasters?
>
> > =================================================================
>
> > US Infrastructure Is Deplored
> > Engineers' appraisal fuels Senate hunt for more funding
> > Published on Thursday, March 26, 2009
> > by Jon Schmitz
> >http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09085/958457-147.stm
>
> > The nation has gone backward in the last four years from an already sorry
> > performance in maintaining vital infrastructure, a national engineers group
> > reported yesterday.
>
> > "America's infrastructure rates a cumulative grade of D," the American
> > Society of Civil Engineers said, citing delayed maintenance and chronic
> > underfunding of roads, bridges, transit, dams, aviation and other
> > infrastructure.
>
> > The organization issued its comprehensive 2009 Report Card for America's
> > Infrastructure yesterday as a U.S. Senate committee wrestled with ways to
> > come up with more funding, including Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell's proposal
> > for a federal capital budget funded by borrowing.
>
> > The organization said surface transportation and aviation systems have
> > declined since its last report card in 2005, with aviation and public
> > transit falling from D+ to D and roads from D to D-.
>
> > "Americans spend 4.2 billion hours a year stuck in traffic at a cost to the
> > economy of $78.2 billion, or $710 per motorist," the report said. "Poor
> > conditions cost motorists $67 billion a year in repairs and operating
> > costs."
>
> > The group estimated that $2.2 trillion must be spent in the next five years
> > to restore the nation's infrastructure to good condition. "Current spending
> > amounts to only about half of the needed investment," it said.
>
> > The organization's president, D. Wayne Klotz, said spending more money on
> > infrastructure "is important, but the solution will involve more than just
> > money. It will take sound technology, wise community planning and involved
> > citizens willing to partner with the government and private sector to make
> > real change."
>
> > The report was cited frequently at a hearing yesterday in Washington, D.C.,
> > of the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee attended by Mr.
> > Rendell and U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. While the parties
> > generally agreed on the need for increased infrastructure spending, they
> > disagreed on how to raise the money.
>
> > Mr. Rendell said current federal funding levels won't allow states to
> > tackle big new transportation projects. "It's impossible to do anything but
> > fixing, repairing, maintaining," he said.
>
> > He said the federal governments should, like state and local governments,
> > adopt a capital budget with borrowing that spreads the cost of projects over
> > 20 or 30 years "instead of all up front."
>
> > He called for creation of a national infrastructure bank that could
> > leverage private investment and would choose projects for funding based on
> > merit, rather than the politics-driven earmarking process now in place.
>
> > "I think the American people will support common-sense infrastructure
> > investment," Mr. Rendell said.
>
> > He said he supports an increase in the federal gasoline tax, which hasn't
> > been raised since 1993, but said that was only part of the solution.
>
> > The committee chairwoman, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., said she was
> > "averse" to raising the gasoline tax and cool to the idea of abandoning a
> > pay-as-you-go system of funding transportation improvements.
>
> > With Congress set this year to fashion a new multiyear transportation
> > funding bill, Mr. LaHood said "there's a very strong commitment from
> > President [Barack] Obama to put everything on the table, see what ideas
> > stick, what makes sense."
>
> > But on a federal gas tax increase, he said: "That's off the table right
> > now" because of "hard economic times."
>
> > Ms. Boxer noted that the federal stimulus legislation provided $48 billion
> > for transportation improvements, including $27.5 billion for highways, that
> > she said would improve infrastructure and create jobs.
>
> > The bill "was a good start, but it is not enough. We must have continued
> > investment to maintain these jobs, and to make additional, needed
> > improvements to our transportation infrastructure," she said.
>
> > "It is important to note that the $27.5 billion for highways in [the]
> > stimulus is in no way a substitute for the hundreds of billions needed to
> > address our nation's infrastructure crisis," said Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla.
>
> > "Transportation and infrastructure are not all that complicated," said Sen.
> > Bernard Sanders of Vermont, an independent.
>
> > "The bottom line is ... if you allow your infrastructure to deteriorate
> > year after year after year, you don't put funding into it, you know what?
> > It's going to get worse. And that is precisely what we have done as a
> > nation.
>
> > "The irony is it costs more to rebuild crumbling infrastructure than to
> > simply maintain it. We have been really dumb and we have wasted enormous
> > sums of money.
>
> > "We are going to have a great debate on how we raise the money, but we must
> > raise that money."
>
> >  __._,_.___
> >   Messages in this topic
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/message/430760;_yl...>(
> > 1)  Reply (via web post)
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJy...>| 
> > Start
> > a new topic
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJl...>
> >  Messages<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/messages;_ylc=X3oD...>|
> > Files<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/files;_ylc=X3oDMTJ...>|
> > Photos<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/photos;_ylc=X3oDMT...>|
> > Links<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/links;_ylc=X3oDMTJ...>|
> > Polls<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/polls;_ylc=X3oDMTJ...>|
> > Calendar<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/calendar;_ylc=X3oD...>
> >   MARKETPLACE
> >  ------------------------------
> > From kitchen basics to easy recipes - join the Group from Kraft Foods
> > <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=14kalo0uc/M=493064.12016295.13271503.1083...>
> >  ------------------------------
> > What's your IQ score? Want to know how smart you really are? Find out at
> > Quizyou.net.<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=14k4jpraf/M=730914.13354441.13465017.1083...>
> >   [image: Yahoo! 
> > Groups]<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkcmozNDQ4BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycEl...>
> > Change settings via the 
> > Web<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJm...>(Yahoo!
> >  ID required)
> > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily 
> > Digest<[email protected]?subject=email+delivery:+Digest>|
> >  Switch
> > format to 
> > Traditional<[email protected]?subject=change+delivery+format:+Traditional>
> >  Visit Your Group
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom;_ylc=X3oDMTJkMzI4a...>| 
> > Yahoo!
> > Groups Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> | Unsubscribe
> > <[email protected]?subject=>
> >    Recent Activity
>
> >    -  2
> >    New 
> > Members<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/members;_ylc=X3oDM...>
>
> >  Visit Your Group
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom;_ylc=X3oDMTJlN2w5Z...>
> >   Yahoo! Groups
>
> > Cat 
> > Zone<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=14hrgp6gg/M=493064.12016263.12445670.8674...>
>
> > Connect w/ others
>
> > who love cats.
> >  Yahoo! Groups
>
> > Auto Enthusiast 
> > Zone<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=14h4ub7bk/M=493064.12717544.13455789.8674...>
>
> > Auto Enthusiast Zone
>
> > Car groups and more!
> >  Weight Management Group
>
> > on Yahoo! 
> > Groups<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=14i17iqpo/M=493064.12016300.12445692.1132...>
>
> > Join the challenge
>
> > and lose weight.
> >   .
>
> > __,_._,___
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to