Crime is probably the best solution. On Mar 27, 5:03�pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetings Members! > > I have been giving this some thought, and have some ideas for submitting > this idea, (once I get the premise of this agenda perfected and ironed out, > researched and in a proper format) to the National Republican Committee, as > well as the Cato Institute, and (possibly) the Council on Foreign > Relations, �and several other think tanks. > > I would really like to hear input, "yea's"; �"nay's"; �"This stinks"; "Horse > Hockey"; �or even "Sounds Pretty Good" from anyone and everyone. � The more > bullets that folks can shoot at this, the better I might be able to perfect > what it is that I am proposing. > > Thanks to Marty Carbone and to Mr. Joe Fritz, Esq., (Tampa Florida) for > planting the seed of this idea with me, and if you haven't been to Marty's > web site, it is an interesting read, whether you agree with all of his > premises.....Or not!! > > http://www.alphabeticalist.com/ > > ============= > > As I understand it, there are approximately five million immigrants that are > allowed to immigrate into the United States annually. (I have not checked > the statute on this, but I have been told this is correct). �I am personally > aware, that sometimes, the waiting list to immigrate into the United > States, by (United States Customs/Department of Homeland Security) is at > least three years, and sometimes as long as ten years. > > Currently, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, ("FDIC") has mandated > that any and all of the housing foreclosures must be written off of any > financial institutions' books, as of NOW. � This is currently the crux of > our banking institution's problem; *e.g*.; the "toxic assets". �In a > nutshell, these toxic assets are total losses to both the bank that > guaranteed the loan, and companies that underwrote the loan, like A.I.G. > > I propose that the Congress (and the Executive Branch Agencies) mandate, (in > Administrative Code versus statute; *e.g*.; Code of Federal Regulations > versus United States Code); that a certain percentage of new immigrants who > are applying for immigration visas into the United States, get moved up to > the "head of the line" of the "immigration waiting list", �and be allowed to > immigrate into the United States immediately, if they agree to purchase > outright, with cash money, one of these "toxic assets"; at the real value of > the home. �When I say "real value", I am talking about what the property's > actual pay-off is, versus what the property might now be appraised at. > > This would do a number of things, to instantly correct the financial > imbalances in our Nation, and the "recession/depression". > > First, let's look at the numbers. �Assuming that there are 5,000,000 > immigrants applying to come into the United States annually, if we took just > 10 percent of those five million, to "bump" them up in line, providing that > they had the wherewithall to purchase one of these homes, (and believe me, > there are literally millions of folks clamoring to get into the United > States that have the ability to do this!!) then that would be 50 thousand > individuals. � Assuming that these 50 thousand individuals were to purchase > a home for two hundred thousand dollars, that is one hundred billion dollars > pumped into our economy IMMEDIATELY!! > > More importantly, what would happen, is that these toxic assets, which have > been written off, and are on the books as a loss, now become a valid, > legitimate asset. �This frees up the credit crunch, literally overnight! > Besides the fact that it pumps into the American economy over 100 billion > dollars annually, (and probably considerably more than that, because the 200 > thousand dollar amount is �a lowball figure) these assets can now be > utilized by banks as assets to collateralize and to make loans upon..... > > What am I missing here? > > Thoughts, ideas, suggestions? > > I really do think the Republican Party needs to run with this idea. � The > only downfall I see, is that those on the far left; e.g.; those that are, > "More tolerant, kinder, gentler, and more enlightened", (in other words, Far > left extremists!!) �could possibly be opposed, because we are going to bump > up in line, immigrants who have expendable income, versus the poor, > downtrodden, and dependent types, that the Democrat Party wants to allow to > immigrate, who would immediately be clamoring for government handouts. > > Again, I sincerely welcome input here!! > > Thanks, > > Keith > > Let's assume for a moment, --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
