This one slipped right under the radar, at least for me.  I didn't hear
anything regarding this nomination in any of the mainstream media, and I
glanced at all cable news networks' news shows last night, as well as
perused the NYT, the WSJ, the Charlotte Observer, and the Tampa
Tribune.....Nothing with regard to this appointment/nomination!!!  (Or maybe
I just missed it???)




*Another Day, Another Scary Nomination*
**
*
http://townhall.com/columnists/DavidLimbaugh/2009/03/31/another_day,_another_scary_nomination
*

David Limbaugh
Tuesday, March 31, 2009

As usual, President Barack Obama is multi-tasking the dismantling of the
American system on so many fronts that not all of the outrages can be
properly monitored. So while you should be mortified by his dictatorial
power grab with General Motors, please don't miss his recent nomination of
former Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh as legal adviser for the State
Department.

In his new position, Koh not only would represent the United States before
international bodies, such as the U.N. and the International Court of
Justice, but also would influence the degree to which laws of other
countries should influence American jurisprudence.

After reading an alarming piece by Meghan Clyne in the New York Post
concerning the Koh nomination and the degree to which Koh believes it's
appropriate for courts to consider other nations' laws in interpreting our
Constitution, I read a number of Koh's legal writings and speeches.

Clyne reported that New York lawyer Steven Stein said that Koh, in
addressing the Yale Club of Greenwich in 2007, claimed that "in an
appropriate case, he didn't see any reason why sharia law would not be
applied to govern a case in the United States."

It turns out that on March 21, 2007, Carol Iannone, on Phi Beta Cons blog,
published a letter from Stein to Dean Koh about his Yale Club remarks. Stein
wrote, in part, "In your discussion of 'global law' I recall at least one
favorable reference to 'Sharia', among other foreign laws that could, in an
appropriate instance (according to you) govern a controversy in a federal or
state court in the US."

Whether or not Koh ever responded to Stein's letter, Stein's representations
of Koh's remarks are certainly consistent with Koh's writings that I
reviewed.

In Fordham Law Review, Koh asserted that the U.S. "Supreme Court is divided
between two judicial camps: the transnationalists and the nationalists." Koh
considers himself a transnationalist and justices Roberts, Scalia and Alito
nationalists.

Koh explained the differences between these two judicial philosophies.
According to Koh, transnationalist judges look to U.S. interdependence,
whereas nationalists tend to look to U.S. autonomy. Transnationalists think
about how U.S. law fits into a framework of transnational law, while
nationalists see a rigid foreign and domestic divide. Transnationalists
think that courts can "domesticate" international law (make it part of our
law), whereas nationalists think that only the political branches can.
Transnationalists favor the development of a global legal system, while
nationalists prefer a national legal system.

In other words, nationalists don't believe that it's appropriate to look to
foreign law in interpreting our Constitution. They believe that only the
political branches, not the courts, can adopt provisions of international
law, and they don't believe in slavish deference to global legal
authorities, such as the International Criminal Court.

Transnationalists clearly believe in an ever-changing, living Constitution
and reject originalism (interpreting the Constitution according to its
original understanding). They are obviously globalists, not overly concerned
with American's national sovereignty. They see the international community,
in the words of Koh, as a "community of reason" and believe that American
judges, in interpreting our Constitution, can resort to this "community of
reason" (foreign laws) to choose between two "plausible" legal positions.
Indeed, Koh wrote approvingly of United States Supreme Court decisions
acknowledging "evolving standards of decency" and that we may look to this
global community of reason to determine what those standards are.

If any of this is too legalistic, let me quote from Koh's "Jefferson
Memorial Lecture on Transnational Legal Process After September 11,"
published in the Berkeley Journal of International Law.

In his introductory remarks, Koh said the United States, along with North
Korea and Iran, form "the axis of disobedience," that is, those nations
"whose disobedience with international law has attracted global attention
after Sept. 11." Are you beginning to see the picture here?

If not, try his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sept. 16,
2008, in which he lamented that the Bush administration forfeited the
"universal sympathy" America enjoyed as a victim of the 9/11 attacks with a
"series of unnecessary, self-inflicted wounds, which have gravely diminished
our global standing and damaged our reputation for respecting the rule of
law," including Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, torture, indefinite detention of
enemy combatants, military commissions, warrantless wiretaps, evasion of the
Geneva Conventions and international human rights treaties, excessive
government secrecy, attacks on the United Nations, and others.

It's no surprise to me that President Obama seeks to install as assistant
State Department legal counsel a man who, like George Soros and a host of
ultra-left-wing bloggers, believes America is always the bad guy and that we
should rehabilitate ourselves through following the wisdom of foreign
nations and international bodies.

Does it surprise you?



Copyright © 2009 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

<<inline: AnotherMoonbatFromAcademia, Harold Koh.jpg>>

Reply via email to