Hey Profit! I surmise that you probably have not actually read Buchanan's writings, but instead, have depended upon far left extremists with an agenda to interpret his writings for you. Buchanan was in fact advocating for secured borders long before September, 2001, but I have never read anything where he was denouncing foreigners, immigrants, or Catholics.
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Estimated Profit 71 < [email protected]> wrote: > > I have no use for either one. I want fiscal conservatives, social > liberals and religious people that keep their views internal. All > three have one thing in common -- they are all about maximum > individual freedom, minimal governmental intervention and require > strong personal ethics and dedication. But, most importantly, this > approach does not look for victims or others to blame. Call it the > "buck stops here" mentality. Populism is almost always saturated with > finding victims and those to blame it on. I have no use for that and > Buchanan has done it with immigrants, foreigners, non0Catholics and > any other group he chooses to marginalize to raise his stake. He was > at the top of my list for a reason. > > > On Apr 4, 10:23 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good Morning Profit!! > > > > I am not sure how you are defining, "Populist", and I also took liberties > > with my examples last night....I understand the concept of "Populist", > and > > could see how either a conservative or a wacko left, socialist-elitist > > Moonbat could be considered a "populist". > > > > With regard to Pat Buchanan, I am not sure that he actually fits the mold > of > > a Populist however. For most of Mr. Buchanan's career, he has been, "on > the > > outside looking in"; and never had a groundswell of public support, > other > > than with a select group of conservatives. > > > > At one time, I had the utmost respect for Buchanan, and somewhere in the > mid > > to late 1990s, I came to the conclusion that Buchanan was misguided, and > > that a number of his policies were dated....That Buchanan was out of step > > with the late 20th century, and had no clue regarding the New Millennium! > > > > I was wrong. It was I that was becoming misguided, and Buchanan was > > exactly on point, on the mark, and totally correct with his vision > regarding > > our immigration policies, our economic policies, and most importantly, > our > > policies toward Russia, Israel and Latin America. > > > > Although he and his sister Bay always look as if they smell shit, they > are > > both great Americans!!! > > > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Estimated Profit 71 < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I would add others to the list: > > > > > Patrick J. Buchanan > > > Barack Obama (though he is a very sneaky populist) > > > > > These two are very high on my list. I have no use for the general > > > approach that either one takes, despite the fact that their goals are > > > diametrically opposed. Populism has often swelled in this country and > > > the core reasons have always been counter to the goals of our founders > > > and have always been a disaster. > > > > > On Apr 4, 12:07 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hey Profit!! > > > > > > LOL!! > > > > > > I see a big difference in Huckabee, as compared to purported > populists > > > > like Al "Stuart Smalley" Franken, Barney "Honkin On Bobo" Frank, and > > > > Chuck "Smell My Shorts" Schumer!! > > > > > > On Apr 3, 11:45 pm, Estimated Profit 71 < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Huckabee is a conservative populist. That makes him no better than > a > > > > > liberal populist. I really do not like Mike. > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 11:34 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I have signed em all, and I voted for Huckabee, not because I > thought > > > he > > > > > > would win, (I thought Romney would!!) but because I thought since > > > Huckabee > > > > > > was supporting the Fair Tax Legislation, that it had a better > chance > > > of > > > > > > being discussed at the Convention, and gathering momentum!! > > > > > > > > I was an idiot!!! > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Travis <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Remember, I'm from Huckabee territory. > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Estimated Profit 71 < > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> You da man!!! > > > > > > > > >> On Apr 3, 11:06 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > Signed every one I have gotten. > > > > > > > > >> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:17 PM, RichardForbes > > > > > > >> > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > >http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer?pagename=changedc&autlogin=true > > > > > > > > >> > -- > > > > > > >> > *~@):~{> >>- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > buchanan.jpg > > 50KViewDownload > > > > Bay016.jpg > > 32KViewDownload- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
