If you want to quote me do so correctly. It is NOT difficult... unlees your point needs to twist the words in order to be made.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:21 PM, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > The first to ignore the UN??? Many did so pre 1980... Shall we list > them, even European nations??? > > On Apr 8, 2:09 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > If I'm not mistaken the US does not consider six men (Che had resigned > from > > ALL Cuban service) talking politics and basicallly starving in the > outback > > to be a reasonable threat... in this case there is no point to be made by > > you. As far as some of the other excursions made by Cuba during their > > "foreign travels", those soldiers were on loan to the Soviet bloc.... Is > the > > US responsible for UN actions ?? > > > > And as far as deserving to be convicted... what difference does it > make... > > the first to openly ignore the UN was indeed, you guessed it, the US > under > > Raygun Ronnie, when he unilaterally pulled the US from the ICJ > jurisdiction > > AFTER being convicted and an 18 billion dollar (still unpaid) verdict > > was rendered for war crimes............ > > > > How soon the right points fingers forgetting they paved the way. > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, dick thompson <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > What a contortionist you libs are. You think Castro was invited into > > > Bolivia when he sent Che there? You think he was invited when he sent > his > > > people to the other countries? > > > > > THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote: > > > > > Should they ??? No. He has not made a single overt or covert move > > > outside his borders that did not include an invitation of another (the > > > affected) sitting sovereign government. That would be the US method > > > and why the Spanish feel they have a right to act. > > > > > On Apr 8, 10:42 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You didn't answer my question. Should the US courts indict Castro? If > > > he then showed up in NYC to speak at the UN he could then be arrested. > > > Do you support that? > > > > > THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote: > > > > > They have the right to reach internationally on affairs they think > > > affect or affected their interests in any way. > > > > > Gee, the US does just that as well. > > > > > On Apr 8, 8:33 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > So then you would be with the program if the US courts put out an > > > indictment against Castro or Mugabe or Putin? That would be just > > > hunky-dory with you? > > > > > There was a reason that Saddam was tried in the Iraqi courts, not the > US > > > courts and that reason was the legal one that the Iraqis were setting > up > > > a Republic and had jurisdiction. > > > > > How on earth does Spain have any jurisdiction over the US officials in > > > any way, shape or form. In fact how did they have any jurisdiction > over > > > Pinochet for that matter. This is little men playing games and trying > > > to act as if they were big men - just like this rookie president we are > > > stuck with now. > > > > > THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote: > > > > > Someone has to. > > > > > On Apr 7, 8:31 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > http://online.wsj.com/video/spanish-court-weighs-charges-against-form...quotedtext > - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > -- > > Mark M. Kahle, ,www.filacoffee.com > > > -- Mark M. Kahle, , www.filacoffee.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
