I am not of Arab descent but Phoenician, Caananite and Maronite Christian. :-) Yes- Venice, in particular, declined. The trade routes were taken over by naval powers and explorers.Well, Phillip married Bloody Mary of England! What did you expect? The religious wars were a cover for garnering raw materials, wealth and power
On Apr 15, 4:36�pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > That Arabs hate the Turks almost as much as Western Colonializers is a > story not often told... � The downfall of the land route also effected > the decline of the Italian City States... � The West Coast states of > Portugal, then Holland then England dominated the Asian trade > routes... � And Spain's Religious War ensure Spanish decline post > Phillip II... > > On Apr 15, 4:56�pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The silk route changed to sea lanes- which included the Dardanelles/ > > Hellespont which was strategic for Russia and Britain along with the > > Suez Canal. The oil lines from the Caspian/Caucasus hinges on peaceful > > nations as a route to the West. The path to the Mediterranean has > > changed a couple of times- have not read about it recently. Think the > > Balkans were also involved and, of course, Russia and Iran and > > Chechnya. Syria and Turkey to the east. It's a very rich oil basin in > > the midst of nightmare regarding extraction and transport safety. It > > may ruin the Caspian and caviar- don't know where I picked up that > > thought, however.// The West was still bribing Turkey with lavish > > gifts until WWI and the Ottoman defeat. Have read Lebanese writing on > > the equal cruelty of Britain and Turkey. My grandparents left for > > America and I thought I would never venture to Turkey based on their > > story but I did and enjoyed my visit to Istanbul with my youngest son > > four years ago. An amazing city!//"My Name is Red" is a marvelous > > novel about the empire- Pamuk(?)- it was a library book- the structure > > was brilliant. Also got halfway through another-"Snow" dealing with > > suicides and scarves for the women.// > > > On Apr 15, 9:17 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The Ottoman Empire arose when land trading routes between Asia and > > > Europe were KIng... And they, like any rising power took advantage of > > > new technologies of the day (the cannon)... Like an Interstate > > > Highway bypassing a town, The Ottoman Empire centrality to trade route > > > were reduced over time to the backwater (over 200 years)... And of > > > course the Industrial Revolution of 1750 was a British notion which > > > the Ottomans ignored to their further demise... Yet in 1686 they > > > were the dominant East European Power... The Hapsbergs and the Tsars > > > learned from their European rivals while Iran was warring with the > > > Ottomans and after 1700 the Ottomans went into their long and prolong > > > decline... > > > > On Apr 14, 11:18 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > For a while the Ottoman Empire managed the Middle East but grew > > > > corrupt and was a delicious morsel for Russia, Britain and France to > > > > slice up. > > > > > On Apr 14, 10:06 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > India matters > > > > > --- > > > > > to who? pirates? > > > > > they're as screwed up as the ME > > > > > > On Apr 14, 4:56 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > and will matter more and more to US global interests... If Obama was > > > > > > the brain many say he is, he SHOULD have understood that... Why > > > > > > Obama should memo Obama "Pay attention to India dummy"... Piracy is > > > > > > located in the Indian Ocean for GOOD reasons... > > > > > > >http://www.tampabay.com/news/perspective/article990022.ece > > > > > > > >>> Like a microcosm of the world at large, the greater Indian > > > > > > >>> Ocean region is developing into an area of both ferociously > > > > > > >>> guarded sovereignty and astonishing interdependence. And for > > > > > > >>> the first time since the Portuguese onslaught in the region in > > > > > > >>> the early 16th century, the West's power there is in decline, > > > > > > >>> however subtly and relatively. The Indians and the Chinese will > > > > > > >>> enter into a dynamic great-power rivalry in these waters, with > > > > > > >>> their shared economic interests as major trading partners > > > > > > >>> locking them in an uncomfortable embrace. The United States, > > > > > > >>> meanwhile, will serve as a stabilizing power in this newly > > > > > > >>> complex area. Indispensability, rather than dominance, must be > > > > > > >>> its goal.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
