Hey Studio!!

Let me make sure I understand your logic......You are pissed at the grass
roots movement that created the Tea Parties, because FOX News chose to cover
the events?

I am baffled.....




On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:32 PM, studio <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I hate taxes, which I consider plain robbery, but not all tax protests
> are equal. The stench of Fox News and other rightists should give
> these
> "tea parties" a taint that no one would want to be associated with.
>
> It's interesting to note the mention of money from Koch, a billionaire
> who gives so much to conservative and right-libertarian groups that
> left-libertarians have labeled them the "Kochtopus".
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/14-4
> Tuesday, April 14, 2009 by FireDogLake
> The Corporate Lobbyists Behind the Tea Parties
> by Jane Hamsher
>
> Anyone who has watched Fox News of late has seen them talking about
> the
> April 15 "tea party" demonstrations, which they take pains to
> characterize as a spontaneous grassroots uprising against government
> spending that they are simply "covering."
>
> Neil Cavuto said:
>
> "We are are going to be in the middle of these protests because at
> Fox,
> we do not pick and choose these rallies and protests. We were there
> for
> the Million Man March, even though, as I pointed out, it turned out to
> be well shy of a million men."
>
> The Million Man March happened in 1995. Fox News didn't go on the
> air until 1996.
>
> Why all the effort to distance themselves from the teabaggers? It's
> obvious they are integrally involved -- Fox has given them millions in
> free publicity, despite the fact that there's no evidence of "ratings
> gold" here. Four of their biggest stars will be appearing at the
> rallies, Fox Nation will be hosting a "virtual tea party," Glenn Beck
> is
> holding a $500 a plate fundraiser for them and Fox has been
> officially promoting the entire affair as the FNC Tax Day Tea Parties.
>
> Maybe they're afraid that if people knew that those behind the
> demonstrations were the very same lobbyists and influence peddlers the
> teabaggers claim to decry, the whole thing would be revealed to be
> what
> it is -- a hollow excercise in extremist right-wing hypocrisy.
>
> A report by Lee Fang at Think Progress documents the involvement of
> corporate lobbyists FreedomWorks in organizing the teabaggers.
> FreedomWorks is run by ladies' man (and registered lobbyist)
> Dick Armey, and if they're not "organizing" the Tea parties, it's news
> to him. From a letter he wrote on March 10:
>
> "FreedomWorks has been organizing many of these 'tea parties' and we
> are
> listing the details on our website IamWithRick.com
>
> "If you visit the website, you can rsvp for an event near you, and you
> can download guidelines to organizing a tea party in your home town if
> there isn't one being planned already."
>
> On the Freedomworks website, it says: "If you are not able to organize
> or attend a Taxpayer Tea Party, you can still help the cause by
> donating
> or buying a t-shirt.
>
> The "donation" for the Tea Parties page goes to -- you guessed it --
> the
> FreedomWorks Foundation. The "thank you" letter is signed by Matt
> Kibbe, President & CEO, who cut his teeth working for Lee Atwater. He
> was behind the attempt to get Ralph Nader put on the ballot in Oregon
> in 2004, prompting a complaint to the FEC of illegal collusion with
> the GOP.
>
> FreedomWorks was launched as a GOP version of MoveOn. "We believe that
> hard work beats daddy's money," said Dick Armey at the time. Armey
> seems
> to be a bit irony challenged -- Steve Forbes is on the FreedomWorks
> board. As Krugman notes, their money comes from the Koch, Scaife,
> Bradley, Olin and other reliable funders of right wing infrastructure
> including Exxon Mobil.
>
> This fact that none of this would be possible without the open
> checkbooks of right wing billionaires and the lobbyists who love them
> is
> beyond the grasp of Glenn Reynolds:
>
> "These aren't the usual semiprofessional protesters who attend antiwar
> and pro-union marches. These are people with real jobs; most have
> never
> attended a protest march before. They represent a kind of energy that
> our politics hasn't seen lately, and an influx of new activists."
>
> In 2004, a woman who identified herself as a "single mother" in Iowa,
> Sandra Jacques, appeared at a George Bush town hall and gushed about
> his
> plan to privatize Social Security. She left out the part about being
> an
> employee of Freedomworks, who were lobbying on the issue at the time.
>
> Before any media covering these events accept the idea that this is
> just
> a grass roots outpouring of populist sentiment, they ought to take a
> look behind the curtain -- where Dick Armey is laughing and counting
> his
> cash.
>
> Jane Hamsher is the founder of firedoglake.com. Her work has also
> appeared on The Daily Beat, AlterNet, The Nation and The American
> Prospect.
>
> --
> Dan Clore
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to