HOOOLLLYYYYY CARP

 From Dennenger again at Market ticker

LUN

/Speaking of which..../

/ I wrote a post about Ponta Negra -- a hedge fund that I thought was 
more likely than not to be fraudulent. I did not name Ponta Negra in the 
post but I put two of their marketing documents on the web and some 
people found them. /

/ I withdrew that post after threats from lawyers. I also removed the 
documents from the web./

/Oh boy, here come the lawyers making threats!

There's only one small problem - the widdle blogger was right!/

/ I have done this because Francesco Rusciano of Ponta Negra has 
formally had his assets frozen by a Federal Judge at the request of the 
SEC. Also see here for the formal charges. /

/Now this isn't particularly newsworthy. No, the newsworthy part is this:/

/ Anyway I will save you the suspense. All of this would not be the 
biggest story on my blog except that Ponta Negra is marketed out of the 
office of Paradigm Global -- a fund of hedge funds owned and controlled 
by Hunter Biden and James Biden. Hunter and James are the son and 
brother of Vice President Joe Biden respectively./

Whhhaaaaattttttt????????

Speechless.

Posted by: Pofarmer 
<http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/996-It-Just-Never-Stops.html> 
|


April 29, 2009 at 06:46 PM 
<http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2009/04/and-byron-yorks-point-is.html?cid=6a00d83451b2aa69e201156f68b088970c#comment-6a00d83451b2aa69e201156f68b088970c>



        It Just Never Stops
        
<http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/996-It-Just-Never-Stops.html>

 From Reuters this morning 
<http://www.reuters.com/article/GlobalFinancialRegulation09/idUSTRE53R3QN20090428>:

    The chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services
    Committee said Congress will give the Securities and Exchange
    Commission the authority it needs to require hedge funds to register
    with the agency.

Of course.  The banks were getting low on money to pay their bi-annual 
bribes, er, campaign contributions with.

I always find it amusing when the solution to some crisis is more laws, 
when the existing laws are ignored.

Speaking of which 
<http://brontecapital.blogspot.com/2009/04/fraudulent-hedge-fund-associated-with.html>....

    I wrote a post about Ponta Negra -- a hedge fund that I thought was
    more likely than not to be fraudulent.  I did not name Ponta Negra
    in the post but I put two of their marketing documents on the web
    and some people found them.  

    I withdrew that post after threats from lawyers.  I also removed the
    documents from the web.

Oh boy, here come the lawyers making threats! 
 
There's only one small problem - the widdle blogger was */right!/*

    I have done this because Francesco Rusciano of Ponta Negra has
    *formally had his assets frozen by a Federal Judge at the request of
    the SEC* <http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090427-718966.html>.
     Also see *here* <http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2009/2009-90.htm>
    for the formal charges.  

Now this isn't particularly newsworthy.  No, the newsworthy part is this:

    Anyway I will save you the suspense.  All of this would not be the
    biggest story on my blog except that Ponta Negra is marketed out of
    the office of *Paradigm Global* <http://www.paradigm-ny.com/> -- a
    fund of hedge funds owned and controlled by Hunter Biden and James
    Biden.  Hunter and James are the son and brother of Vice President
    Joe Biden respectively.

Oops.  Well, that explains the attempt to shut the widdle blogger up.  
Too bad it failed.

Anyway, go to the link for the base article and read it.  It's yet 
another one of those "fund of funds" deals, and it appears that it is 
the Veep's family that's somehow involved.  What's even better is that 
they appear to be tangled up with Stanford Financial up to their nuts.

This ought to be a lot of fun as it all unwinds, and you can bet I'll be 
keeping my ear to the ground.

If you look outside the US you find actual reporters who report actual 
news.  Like, for instance, this from The Times in the UK 
<http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/banking_and_finance/article6180480.ece>:

    John Thain, the Wall Street veteran who was ousted from Merrill
    Lynch following its takeover by Bank of America (BoA), has fired
    back at attempts to blame him for the investment bank's surprise
    loss and controversial bonus payments.

    "Getting fired is one thing. But nobody has the right to say things
    that they know aren't true," he told the WSJ.

    Mr Thain insisted that *Mr Lewis knew that the bonus payments were
    being made ahead of schedule and agreed to them in writing.* The WSJ
    reported that this claim was backed up by documents reviewed by the
    newspaper.

Oh oh - not in writing!  You know, that nasty thing that happens when 
you use this old technology called "a pen" and it can be presented to 
this thing called "a jury"?

When it comes to the pied pipers of the world, on *this* side of the 
pond, we have this piece of putrid tripe 
<http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MTI1OGJlMWQwMDA0NDE4MWFlYzlhMjIxYjQ4MzM5Yzc=>:

    The thumping chorus to drain the toxic assets clogging our banking
    system drones on as the economy patiently waits for the life-blood
    of new credit. Many argue that bank nationalization may be our only
    hope. This is naïve madness.

    Early quarterly earnings reports from U.S. banks *clearly
    demonstrate the banking system's hefty ability to absorb "toxicity"
    on its own*. While there is a natural obsession among analysts and
    the financial media* *to dice and denigrate headline-earnings
    results, core operating margins appear substantively intact.

Uh huh.  And who is this guy?

    /--- Robert B. Albertson is principal and chief strategist for
    Sandler O'Neill & Partners LP <http://www.sandleroneill.com/>./

Oh, I see.  An investment banking concern.  Ok.

Mr. Albertson is entitled to his opinion, of course, but I'd like to 
know what he bases that opinion on.  Certainly it has to be more than 
the fact that banks reported "earnings" using various forms of 
accounting gimmickry, yes?  Legal or not, things like shifting one's 
reporting period (as was done with Goldman) or pressing one-time gains 
from "advantageous" trading circumstances with crippled counterparties 
(e.g. AIG) is hardly an indication of soundness.

Nor should one consider stealing $700 billion from the taxpayer and then 
posting a couple of billion in "profit" a good indication of soundness.  
After all, any monkey can lose 95% of the money stolen from everyday 
Americans and then report "great profits!" with the remaining 5%.

Maybe Mr. Albertson can provide all of us with some actual analysis?  
How about putting market prices to all of these institution's holdings 
and showing me (and everyone else) that when this exercise is done the 
bank in question has a greater number for assets .vs. liabilities?  Oh, 
and please do show your work; Dick Bove never does and yet he continues 
to pound the table that all is well even though if you hit the 
Cramer-style "buy-buy-buy" button */last/* spring on his recommendation 
some of the banks involved (WaMu, Wachovia, etc) were either near or 
literal zeros, and essentially all of them have handed you a monstrous loss.

See, I and others have been trying to get our arms around the asset 
valuation problem since I first started screaming about Washington 
Mutual (WaMu) back in April of 2007, more than two years ago.

I still can't get to the facts but its not for lack of trying.  Rather, 
it is due to the lack of disclosure about exactly what's in the big bad 
black box, and that's an intentional act - by the banks.

Unfortunately when I take what I believe are reasonable indications of 
current market values and apply them to what is claimed for the 
composition of these portfolios, given what *is* disclosed, I get a 
really big number for the balance between assets and liabilities.

The problem is that it's in parenthesis.



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to