Here you go again:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,622682,00.html

VT VirtualTruth wrote On 05/04/2009 10:24 PM:
> What? There was no German link in any of your
> posts in your replies in this string after my post asking
> for a link!
>
> On May 4, 10:21 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>> I put in the German one today.
>>
>> VT VirtualTruth wrote On 05/04/2009 09:53 PM:
>>
>>     
>>> LINKS....Give them to back your post.
>>>       
>>> On May 3, 11:33 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Check the London Times, the Paris newspapers, the Deutsche Welt, the UK
>>>> Guardian and the UK Daily Telegraph, especially the Washington reporter
>>>> for the UK Daily Telegraph.  H really lit into Bambi.  They all reported
>>>> on how badly Bambi did with the NATO meeting.  The Italians also
>>>> reported it in the Corriere della Serra (sp).
>>>>         
>>>> VT VirtualTruth wrote On 05/03/2009 09:58 PM:
>>>>         
>>>>> Compared to Bush he went over very well.
>>>>>           
>>>>> Hey post those articles for us all to read, not that I don't
>>>>> trust everything you hear from Rush and pals and repeat here
>>>>> as if it is the gospel.....history however says factcheck anything
>>>>> coming
>>>>> from the Right.
>>>>>           
>>>>> On May 3, 9:40 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> You need to read some of the Euro papers.  He did not go over as well as
>>>>>> portrayed.  The Brits and the Germans and definitely the French are
>>>>>> laughing at him and his faux pas.  Great thing to do  is s*it on our
>>>>>> biggest long time allies and that is what he did.  Then the Sec of State
>>>>>> makes it even worse with her faux pas - and she was supposed to be a
>>>>>> foreign policy expert!
>>>>>>             
>>>>>> I am not going to respond to your Bush spar as that was not anything to
>>>>>> do with this - we are talking about how bad Bambi has done so far.
>>>>>>             
>>>>>> VT VirtualTruth wrote On 05/03/2009 09:31 PM:
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> So explain to me again what Bush got correct in his 8 years?
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>> Obama has been President for only 100 DAYS, and has done
>>>>>>> more to re-establish the Prestige of America world wide and
>>>>>>> the Confidence of the American people  things that Bush thoroughly
>>>>>>> destroyed in his 8 years. This can be measured by the 2006 and 2008
>>>>>>> elections
>>>>>>> the low approval ratings of both Bush and the Republican Congress.
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>> On May 3, 7:22 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> And this president is doing so well with that as his Sec of State talks
>>>>>>>> about they have a nice statue in the Virgin of Guadalape, what is it 
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> or he can give DVD's that can only be played in the US to a prime
>>>>>>>> minister who is almost blind or he can bow to a King as if he were a
>>>>>>>> loyal subject or he can be described by the French president as an
>>>>>>>> idiot.  Good job there.  He even goes so far as to give his own book as
>>>>>>>> an audio book as the official gift to the Queen of England.  Even
>>>>>>>> better.  He apologizes to all our enemies and disregards all our
>>>>>>>> friends.  Evn more good stuff.  Wow give that man a piece of chewing 
>>>>>>>> gum
>>>>>>>> and he will actually be able to walk the dog (at 5:15 in the morning
>>>>>>>> even) and chew the gum at the same time.  Amazing!
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>> VT VirtualTruth wrote On 05/03/2009 07:10 PM:
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> I rather have a president who pays attention and follows
>>>>>>>>> current events, rather than the last president who couldn't
>>>>>>>>> keep focus during briefings, so they cut them down to small
>>>>>>>>> sound bites he can follow.
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>> But only Republicans can't understand how A President can do more than
>>>>>>>>> one thing at a time and but constantly updated on events.
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>> On May 1, 11:43 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/01/us/politics/01obama.html?_r=1&th&em...
>>>>>>>>>>                     
> >
>
>   

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to