"to pelosi:" the lie publicly, especially stupidly and hypocritically, while
using Botox to suppress any facial ticks or tells

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> bruce,
>
> Sorry, but I don't get your point here.
>
> You want to condemn people for NOT reporting a crime but you do not
> want to condemn or punish the people who actually committed the
> crime????
>
> On May 9, 10:00 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> > CIA memo cites 40 Congressional briefings on torture By Bill Van Auken
> >
> > A memo released Wednesday by Director of National Intelligence Dennis
> Blair
> > lists 40 separate briefings beginning in September 2002 in which leading
> > members of Congress were briefed by the CIA on the agency’s use of
> “enhanced
> > interrogation techniques”—in plain words, torture.
> >
> > Before the revelations about the employment of such methods as
> waterboarding
> > appeared in the media, none of these legislators, including leading
> > Democrats, objected to or publicly protested against what amounted to war
> > crimes.
> >
> > Blair’s release of the document compiled by the CIA came in response to a
> > request from Representative Pete Hoekstra of Michigan, the top Republican
> on
> > the House intelligence committee. In a letter to Hoekstra, Blair stated
> that
> > the memo “provides a straightforward account of the extent of interaction
> > with the Congress on this issue.”
> >
> > Much of the media attention has focused on the role of House Speaker
> Nancy
> > Pelosi (Democrat, California), who as the ranking Democrat on the House
> > intelligence committee was, together with Republican Representative
> Porter
> > Goss, who went on to become director of the CIA, one of the first members
> of
> > Congress to be briefed on the CIA’s torture tactics.
> >
> > The memo’s description of the briefing reads: “Briefing on EITs [enhanced
> > interrogation techniques] on Abu Zubaydah, background on authorities, and
> a
> > description of the particular EITs that have been employed.”
> >
> > Zubaydah, captured by the CIA in Pakistan in March 2002, was one of the
> > first “high-value” detainees subjected to waterboarding and other forms
> of
> > torture. While the Bush administration grossly inflated Zubaydah’s
> > importance, the torture methods served to extract from him a false
> statement
> > that Iraq was training Al Qaeda terrorists in the use of chemical
> weapons.
> > The Bush administration had ordered the torture in large part to obtain
> such
> > a phony confession in order to bolster its key pretext for launching its
> war
> > of aggression against Iraq.
> >
> > The memo’s description of this initial briefing of Pelosi and Goss
> > contradicts Pelosi’s own account. Just last month, she claimed that the
> CIA
> > “did not brief us that these enhanced interrogations were being used,”
> but
> > merely informed the two intelligence committee leaders about “an array of
> > interrogations that they might have at their disposal.”
> >
> > This claim is hardly credible. Why would the CIA brief two leading
> members
> > of Congress on methods of torture in the abstract? And if they had done
> so,
> > why didn’t Pelosi ask them whether these “techniques” were in fact being
> > used on detainees captured on the “global war on terrorism”?
> >
> > Other briefings listed in the memo included one in February 2003 in which
> > Republican Senator Pat Roberts and Democratic Senator John Rockefeller
> had
> > the EITs “described in considerable detail,” including “how the water
> board
> > was used.”
> >
> > In briefings held in September 2003, Roberts and Rockefeller, as well as
> > Republican Congressman Goss and Pelosi’s successor on the House
> intelligence
> > panel, California Democratic Congresswoman Jane Harmon, were given slide
> > shows in which “non-enhanced and enhanced interrogation techniques were
> > named, described and compared on the same slide.”
> >
> > Subsequent briefings, which included Senator Harry Reid, now the
> Democratic
> > Senate Majority Leader, and the other Democratic members of the Senate
> > Select Committee on Intelligence—Senators Carl Levin, Dianne Feinstein,
> Evan
> > Bayh, Barbara Mikulski and Russ Feingold—heard presentations on
> > “waterboarding, diet manipulation, nudity, walling and stomach slap.”
> >
> > The content of the memo is hardly a revelation. In December 2007, the
> > *Washington
> > Post* reported that in 2002 briefings Pelosi and three other members of
> > Congress were “given a virtual tour of the CIA’s overseas detention sites
> > and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to make prisoners
> talk,”
> > including waterboarding. The *Post *added that while leading Democrats
> > subsequently denounced waterboarding as torture, “on that day, no
> objections
> > were raised. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to
> > push harder.”
> >
> > The patent aim of the congressional Republicans in requesting the public
> > release of the record of these briefings is to intimidate Democrats into
> > dropping the issue of torture, by threatening to focus public attention
> on
> > Democratic complicity in the implementation of the criminal methods
> > introduced under the Bush administration.
> >
> > The issue has divided Washington since President Barack Obama last month
> > released Justice Department memos authorizing the use of these illegal
> > methods, while simultaneously announcing a blanket amnesty for those in
> the
> > CIA who carried them out.
> >
> > Obama has since informed Democratic leaders in Congress that he is
> opposed
> > to any independent investigation of the torture carried out under the
> Bush
> > administration, while publicly stating that the matter is in the hands of
> > his Attorney General Eric Holder. The administration and the majority of
> the
> > Democratic leadership in Congress have also deferred to an inquiry being
> > conducted by the Senate intelligence committee, which will not be
> completed
> > until the end of the year. The probe will be conducted behind closed
> doors,
> > and it is uncertain how much of its findings will be made public.
> >
> > In an appearance on Capitol Hill Thursday, Attorney General Holder dealt
> > with the issue of the torture memos. His testimony before the Senate
> > Appropriations Committee came just a day after the *New York Times*
> reported
> > that a draft report issued by the Justice Department’s Office of
> > Professional Responsibility had concluded that the government attorneys
> who
> > wrote memos declaring specific methods of torture to be legal were guilty
> > only of poor judgment and should not be criminally prosecuted. Holder,
> > however, claimed not to have read the document.
> >
> > Republican Senators Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Richard Shelby of
> > Alabama pointedly questioned Holder about the implications for the
> Democrats
> > themselves of any serious investigation into the question of torture.
> >
> > “What about members of Congress who were informed of them or knew about
> them
> > or approved them or encouraged them, wouldn’t they also be appropriate
> parts
> > of such an investigation?” asked Alexander.
> >
> > Holder responded: “Our desire is not to do anything that would be
> perceived
> > as political, as partisan. We do want to look forward to the extent that
> we
> > can do that.” He added, however, that where “we see violations of those
> > laws, we’ll take the appropriate actions.”
> >
> > Shelby turned to the CIA’s rendition program, in which suspects are
> > kidnapped off the street and transported to secret prisons abroad for
> > interrogation and torture.
> >
> > “Didn’t that happen during the Clinton administration?” he asked. Holder
> > acknowledged that rendition had been employed under the former Democratic
> > president.
> >
> > “How many did you approve?” he continued, referring to Holder’s role at
> the
> > Clinton Justice Department. Holder responded that he would have to
> consult
> > his records.
> >
> > The Obama administration has specifically defended rendition as a
> practice
> > that the CIA will continue using, effectively “disappearing” those who it
> > deems a threat to the US government, transporting them to foreign prisons
> to
> > be held indefinitely, denied the right to either be charged with a crime
> and
> > placed on trial or be released.
> >
> > The Republican campaign is based on the well-founded charge that the
> > Democrats were complicit in the introduction of torture as a policy of
> the
> > US government and therefore are in no position to hold former officials
> of
> > the Bush administration accountable.
> >
> > The media has largely adopted this standpoint, casting the issue as one
> > based primarily on partisan politics. As the *New York Times* put it, the
> > Republicans are “mounting an aggressive pushback on several fronts.”
> >
> > The *Washington Post* commented: “The issue of what Pelosi knew and when
> she
> > knew it has become a tussle on Capitol Hill. Republicans have accused her
> of
> > knowing for years about the interrogation techniques CIA agents were
> using
> > and of objecting only when the tactics became public and antiwar
> activists
> > protested.”
> >
> > The Democrats’ complicity in the systematic use of torture by the US
> > government does not make the practice any less criminal. It is merely
> shows
> > that the entire political establishment—Congress, both major parties, the
> > mass media and the corporate and financial elite—is implicated in the
> crimes
> > of aggressive war and torture and the attacks on democratic rights that
> > developed under the Bush administration.
> >
> > No doubt the Democrats’ complicity in torture and other crimes is a major
> > factor in the reluctance of the Obama administration and the
> congressional
> > leadership to pursue any serious investigation, much less prosecution, of
> > those responsible.
> >
> > However, this is not merely a matter of what Pelosi and others did and
> > didn’t do in briefings held over the last seven years. The Obama
> > administration is itself dependent upon a national security apparatus
> that
> > has changed little in terms of its personnel since the Bush
> administration.
> > The Democrats fear any confrontation with these elements, and their
> > cowardice in relation to the CIA and the military has strengthened the
> > Republican right, which has launched a political offensive in the name of
> > national security.
> >
> > Moreover, just as the Obama administration is continuing the aggressive
> wars
> > launched by the Bush administration—and escalating the one in
> Afghanistan—it
> > has no intention of relinquishing the extraordinary powers that the Bush
> > administration arrogated to itself under the pretext of fighting
> terrorism.
> > Thus, it has gone into court repeatedly to quash legal challenges to
> > policies ranging from domestic spying to extraordinary rendition and
> > torture.
> >
> > The further exposure of the Democrats’ complicity in torture and other
> > crimes of the Bush administration make it clear that they and the Obama
> > administration have no intention of carrying out a serious attempt to
> hold
> > those responsible for these crimes accountable, and that any
> investigation
> > they do initiate will be a whitewash.
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > The difference is clear. Click now for a great laminating
> > machine!<
> http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2142/fc/BLSrjpTG3Hu9PRhB8dJKOLOLZ...>
> >  __._,_.___
> >   Messages in this topic
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/1wonderswhy/message/26576;_ylc=X3oDMTM1..
> .>(
> > 1)  Reply (via web post)
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/1wonderswhy/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJwZDJmdjE3B..
> .>|
> > Start
> > a new topic
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/1wonderswhy/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJkYWdhOTR2B..
> .>
> >  Messages<
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/1wonderswhy/messages;_ylc=X3oDMTJkNzR1a...>|
> > Links<
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/1wonderswhy/links;_ylc=X3oDMTJlN28wNTVy...>|
> > Calendar<
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/1wonderswhy/calendar;_ylc=X3oDMTJjNzU5c...>
> >  The list owner is the author of "Birth of an Angel"
> www.birthofanangel.com
> >
> > Community email addresses:
> > For all moderators to this list: [email protected]
> >   Post message: [email protected]
> >   Subscribe:    [email protected]
> > ------------------------------------------
> >   Homepage:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/1wonderswhy/
> >   [image: Yahoo!
> > Groups]<
> http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJjcjU5b3ZkBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycEl...>
> > Change settings via the
> > Web<
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/1wonderswhy/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNmRkcTRuB..
> .>(Yahoo!
> > ID required)
> > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily
> > Digest<[email protected]?subject=email+delivery:+Digest
> >|
> > Switch
> > format to Traditional<
> [email protected]?subject=change+delivery+format:+Traditional
> >
> >  Visit Your Group
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/1wonderswhy;_ylc=X3oDMTJjMjQ1Y3BjBF9TAz..
> .>|
> > Yahoo!
> > Groups Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> | Unsubscribe
> > <[email protected]?subject=>
> >    Recent Activity
> >
> >  Visit Your Group
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/1wonderswhy;_ylc=X3oDMTJkZjRjZG5tBF9TAz..
> .>
> >   Give Back
> >
> > Yahoo! for Good<
> http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJsb2NiOXM3BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzEE...>
> >
> > Get inspired
> >
> > by a good cause.
> >  Y! Toolbar
> >
> > Get it Free!<
> http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJuM2lhbXNkBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzIE...>
> >
> > easy 1-click access
> >
> > to your groups.
> >  Yahoo! Groups
> >
> > Start a group<
> http://groups.yahoo.com/start;_ylc=X3oDMTJubDN1M3VpBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF...>
> >
> > in 3 easy steps.
> >
> > Connect with others.
> >   .
> >
> > __,_._,___
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to