Socialism and American public opinion
17 April 2009

A national telephone survey conducted in early April by Rasmussen
Reports, the US polling company, discovered that only 53 percent of
Americans believe capitalism to be superior to socialism. Twenty
percent favor socialism and 27 percent are undecided.

Adults under 30, according to Rasmussen, were “essentially evenly
divided: 37 percent prefer capitalism, 33 percent socialism, and 30
percent are undecided.”

These results lift the veil on a reality the US establishment
feverishly seeks to conceal: the existence of a deeply-felt popular
opposition to the existing economic system and social conditions.

The Rasmussen findings, under the ideological conditions that prevail
in America, are a stunning refutation of the official manufactured
public opinion. To the extent that socialism is understood as the
opposite of capitalism, it is viewed favorably by substantial sections
of the population.

There is widespread popular outrage at the bankers, the corporate CEOs
and the rest of the financial aristocracy who have plundered the
country for decades and now accept trillions of dollars in handouts.
This is viewed as deeply unjust by millions of people whose jobs,
pensions and health care benefits are under sustained attack, who have
seen the value of their homes drop dramatically and who generally view
the future with increasing pessimism and even alarm.

The mass anger toward Wall Street and the generalized disaffection
with the existing system generates the strong desire for an
alternative to the present intolerable conditions. That alternative,
evidently, is identified in general terms with “socialism.”

Socialism is associated positively in many minds in America with a
more humane, democratic and egalitarian policy, with a society in
which social needs, and not the profit interests of the rich, are
addressed.

The high level of popular support for such ideas, especially among the
young, is particularly striking when one considers that for the past
60 years or so socialism has been relentlessly denounced in the US, or
banned from public discourse altogether. Within the political
establishment, including its liberal wing, to label someone a
“socialist” has been the equivalent of formally cursing, shunning or
excommunicating an individual.

In recent decades ruling circles were unanimous: the capitalist free
market solved all problems and “un-American” socialism was a dead
issue. Apparently not.

A vast chasm separates Establishment opinion and consensus from the
thoughts and feelings of the working population. The average American
sees and experiences nothing in the mainstream political arena or the
daily media that would offer a favorable picture of socialism. And
yet, according to the poll, 47 percent of the population, according to
this survey, either favor or haven’t made up their minds about
socialism.

In March Barack Obama told a group of top corporate directors, “I’ve
always been a strong believer in the power of the free market. It has
been and will remain the very engine of America’s progress—the source
of a prosperity that has gone unmatched in human history.” When the
economy “gets out of balance,” Obama argued, government has to
intervene, “but the goals should always be to right the ship and let
private enterprise do its magic.”

Millions of Americans think otherwise, but their views find no
expression in the existing set-up. Every significant American
politician, as well as many insignificant ones, is a bought and paid
for stooge of powerful corporations and financial interests. We have,
in effect, the Senator from Oil and Gas, the Governor from Finance,
the Representative from Health Care or Defense. Social inequality has
reached levels disastrous for the functioning of any society; the
obscene flaunting of wealth by the super-rich does not go unnoticed.

The powers that be imagine they have gotten away with their looting of
society, colonial wars and other crimes because the rottenness of the
trade unions, the so-called civil rights organizations and liberalism
has meant no one speaks up for the needs and interests of the
population. But the more the social contradictions are ignored or
papered over, the more explosive they become.

This situation, in which popular sentiment and the entire political
system are so obviously out of joint, is volatile and untenable. The
US has been staggered in the past seven months by the economic
breakdown. Objective developments, despite all the efforts of the
establishment, are bringing about a violent adjustment in the
relationship between social consciousness and social reality:
socialism will emerge as a major presence in American political life.
The poll reflects a process already under way.

After decades of a reactionary bombardment, most Americans are no
doubt confused about socialism. If Rasmussen or any other firm,
however, asked people whether they preferred a society in which all
policy was geared to the enrichment of the wealthiest one percent (or
one-tenth of one percent) of the population, or a society based on
social equality ... what would such a poll show?

In a crisis, inevitably, basic social interests and sentiments find
expression. The present breakdown of the capitalist order is
objectively sorting the population out along class lines.

Despite all the efforts to brutalize American society and render the
population callous and indifferent to the suffering and plight of
others, the recent poll reveals that the broad masses of the people
have an elemental socialistic orientation. They oppose injustice, they
support social equality and democracy, their sympathies lie with the
downtrodden.

The capitalist media believes in its own reality and its infinite
ability to manipulate and shape public opinion. In fact, other
processes are taking place, with ultimately revolutionary
implications. Leon Trotsky offered a far more profound view of the
changes in consciousness that occur in a time of crisis: “Scientific
socialism is the conscious expression of the unconscious historical
process; namely, the instinctive and elemental drive of the
proletariat to reconstruct society on communist beginnings. These
organic tendencies in the psychology of workers spring to life with
utmost rapidity today in the epoch of crises and wars.”

Social development has an inexorable logic. At the very moment when
popular sentiment is shifting to the left, against capitalism, the
remnants of the liberal-left around the Nation magazine proclaim the
virtual impossibility of “reimagining socialism,” much less realizing
it. These social elements, deeply conservative in their outlook and
wedded to the economic status quo, will fiercely oppose the growth of
a mass socialist movement in the US. That is the elemental instinct of
their class, the privileged petty bourgeois.

The poll conducted by Rasmussen is cause for genuine optimism. For the
same reason, while the poll’s uncovering of socialist sympathies in
the population has created a stir in ultra-right circles, it has gone
largely unreported in the major media. If Rasmussen, run by a right-
wing evangelical Christian, meant the poll as a wake-up call, the
phone was promptly hung up.

David Walsh

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to