It depends on the value of the dollar.

On May 31, 7:46�am, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> so true
>
> or get that all the people who were bundling illegal foreign contribitions
> for odumbie and hillary to get those saudis and asians to pay for it
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 8:41 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > There are Hollywood idiots willing to pay $30,000. to dine with Obama.
> > Let them bail out California.
>
> > On May 31, 7:33 am, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Obama (Should Say) to California: Drop Dead by: Peter Schiff May 30,
> > 2009
>
> > > [image: Peter Schiff
> > > picture]<http://seekingalpha.com/author/peter-schiff> Peter
> > > Schiff <http://seekingalpha.com/author/peter-schiff>
>
> > > During the height of New York City's financial crisis in the 1970s,
> > > President Gerald Ford had the good sense to turn down Mayor Abe Beame's
> > > request for a federal bailout. The refusal prompted the famous New York
> > Post
> > > headline, "Ford to City: Drop Dead." More than 30 years later, as
> > California
> > > Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger makes a similar plea to Washington, I hope
> > > President Obama will show similar restraint. Unfortunately, given Obama's
> > > recent string of unwise economic decisions, it's hard to imagine that his
> > > judgment will suddenly improve.
>
> > > A federal bailout would spare California from having to make spending
> > cuts
> > > needed to bring its budget into balance. The matter has become urgent
> > since
> > > California voters rejected several tax-hiking ballot initiatives. Rather
> > > than taking the vote as a signal to dramatically curtail spending, the
> > state
> > > turned to the feds. If they get a free pass, the politicians can avoid
> > > fixing any of their past mistakes or preparing California for the future.
>
> > > California, like many states, expended its bureaucracy as the nation's
> > > bubble economy inflated. When condos flipped like hamburgers and
> > homeowners
> > > flush with equity spent like lottery winners, extra tax revenue flooded
> > into
> > > Sacramento. However, instead of saving the money for a rainy day or
> > paying
> > > off prior debts, the state government simply ballooned its spending. Now
> > > that the bubble has burst, and revenues are severely depleted, it is time
> > > for California to reconsider its excesses.
>
> > > Governor Schwarzenegger's claim that a federal guarantee is not a bailout
> > is
> > > ludicrous. No one in the private sector will lend California any money
> > > because the state can't pay it back. Just like AIG and GM, it needs
> > federal
> > > help to stay solvent. And although the Federal balance sheet is in far
> > worse
> > > shape than California's, there is one crucial difference: Washington has
> > a
> > > printing press, and Sacramento does not. With the ability to pay off
> > debts
> > > with newly created funds, a federal default is not a concern.
>
> > > However, if Obama comes to the rescue, none of the needed cuts will be
> > made.
> > > Instead, California will continue to operate its bloated bureaucracy and
> > > will be in constant need of more bailouts. In other words, if
> > Schwarzenegger
> > > gets his bailout, look for him to utter his famous line - "I'll be back."
>
> > > But it's not just Schwarzenegger who will be back, but governors from all
> > > the other states as well. After all, if the Federal government bails out
> > > California, by what right can they deny similar aid to other states? The
> > > bailout will send a clear message that states do not need to cut
> > spending.
>
> > > Similar to the reckless behavior that resulted from federally guaranteed
> > > mortgages, federal guarantees on state debt will counteract the market's
> > > attempt to force states to act responsibly. As the market accurately
> > > prices-in the heightened risk of default, California faces staggering
> > > increases in its borrowing cost. Under normal circumstances, this
> > pressure
> > > would force the state to act prudently now to diminish the risk of a
> > future
> > > default. However, by allowing California to evade the "bond market
> > > vigilantes," the stage will be set for much bigger losses.
>
> > > The moral hazards created by state bailouts are tremendous. With federal
> > > guarantees given to profligate states, those states that had shown
> > greater
> > > fiscal responsibility will face higher interest rates - as their bonds
> > lack
> > > a federal guarantee. This creates the perverse incentive for all states
> > to
> > > act irresponsibly.
>
> > > Just as government-guaranteed mortgages lead the market to make overly
> > risky
> > > home loans, federally guaranteed state obligations will set the stage for
> > > yet another crisis.
>
> > > Federal backing of California bonds would effectively turn them into
> > > Treasury bonds, with the added appeal of being exempt from California
> > state
> > > income tax. Therefore, the Treasury will be at a competitive disadvantage
> > > when it looks to issue its own debt to Californians. If it then has to
> > > guarantee the bonds of all the other 50 states, why would any Americans
> > buy
> > > Treasuries when they can get identical credit quality on better terms
> > from
> > > the states? The only real buyers left would be foreigners, who are
> > already
> > > queasy about the Treasuries they own.
>
> > > The need to make good on state and federal obligations will further
> > depress
> > > the appeal of all U.S. dollar-denominated debt. As a result, as real
> > buyers
> > > flee the market, the Fed will have to run its printing presses even
> > faster
> > > to pick up the slack. This will set into motion a self-perpetuating
> > spiral
> > > of money printing and Treasury sales with a predictable result:
> > > hyperinflation.
>
> > > In the meantime, by redirecting credit to California that otherwise would
> > > have gone to more credit-worthy borrowers, the government will worsen the
> > > credit crunch for the rest of the country. Since there is only a finite
> > > supply of credit, money borrowed by California will no longer be
> > available
> > > to other borrowers. The effect is a less efficient allocation of capital
> > > that further undermines national productivity.
>
> > > The only rational policy choice for Obama is to send Schwarzenegger
> > packing.
> > > If he does, California will have no choice but to cut spending or default
> > on
> > > its bonds. My guess is that, with their backs to the wall, the California
> > > legislature will choose the former. However, even if they default, at
> > least
> > > the losses will be borne by those who freely assumed the risks. With a
> > > bailout, the losses will be shouldered by those who were not even parties
> > to
> > > the transactions. If we go this route, we can all say "hasta la vista,
> > baby"
> > > to our prosperity.
>
> > >http://seekingalpha.com/article/140371-obama-should-say-to-california...
> > > __._,_.___
> > > Messages in this topic
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/message/442901;_yl..
> > .>(
> > > 1) Reply (via web post)
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJy..
> > .>|
> > > Start
> > > a new topic
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJl..
> > .>
> > > Messages<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/messages;_ylc=X3oD...>|
> > > Files<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/files;_ylc=X3oDMTJ...>|
> > > Photos<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/photos;_ylc=X3oDMT...>|
> > > Links<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/links;_ylc=X3oDMTJ...>|
> > > Polls<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/polls;_ylc=X3oDMTJ...>|
> > > Calendar<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/calendar;_ylc=X3oD...>
> > > [image: Yahoo!
> > > Groups]<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkb21wMjA4BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycEl...>
> > > Change settings via the
> > > Web<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJm..
> > .>(Yahoo!
> > > ID required)
> > > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily
> > > Digest<
> > [email protected]?subject=email+delivery:+Digest
> > >|
> > > Switch
> > > format to Traditional<
> > [email protected]?subject=change+delivery+format:+Traditional
>
> > > Visit Your Group
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom;_ylc=X3oDMTJkMXE2Y..
> > .>|
> > > Yahoo!
> > > Groups Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> | Unsubscribe
> > > <[email protected]?subject=>
> > > Recent Activity
>
> > > - 4
> > > New Members<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/members;_ylc=X3oDM...>
> > > - 1
> > > New Links<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom/links;_ylc=X3oDMTJ...>
>
> > > Visit Your Group
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePoliticalSpinroom;_ylc=X3oDMTJldGFud..
> > .>
> > > Give Back
>
> > > Yahoo! for Good<
> >http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJtbHB2Nmw4BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzEE...>
>
> > > Get inspired
>
> > > by a good cause.
> > > Y! Toolbar
>
> > > Get it Free!<
> >http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJva25nZDduBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9wAzIE...>
>
> > > easy 1-click access
>
> > > to your groups.
> > > Yahoo! Groups
>
> > > Start a group<
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/start;_ylc=X3oDMTJvYjV1azRoBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF...>
>
> > > in 3 easy steps.
>
> > > Connect with others.
> > > .
>
> > > __,_._,___- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to