Reason Alert - June 4, 2009

- Killing General Motors Softly
- California's Fiscal Doom and the Federal Deficit
- Judge Sotomayor Revives the Affirmative Action Debate
- Congress Deceives Taxpayers on Cap-And-Trade Energy Prices
- New at Reason

*Killing General Motors
Softly*<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77606/0/>
Reason Foundation's Shikha Dalmia, based in Detroit, writes: "The president
seems to think that there is nothing that G.M. has that a visit to
bankruptcy court won't cure. Amputate its liabilities to bondholders, excise
all its promises to unions (no, actually, scratch that one, that didn't
quite happen) and, presto, it'll be ready, once again, to kick some foreign
ass. If only! Chapter 11 is certainly a necessary - and a long overdue -
condition for G.M.'s return. But it is not a sufficient condition. What G.M.
also needs is a winning business model...Far from returning the $50 billion,
G.M. is likely to become an unquenchable money-guzzler that taxpayers will
have to feed for many, many, many years to come."
A Green Ride for Government
Motors<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77607/0/>
Jacob Sullum: How Not to Run
GM<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77596/0/>

*California's Fiscal Doom and the Federal
Deficit*<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77593/0/>
Reason magazine's Brian Doherty examines California's cash crisis, the
massive federal deficit and what all of this red ink means: "Federal
revenues for 2007 ($2.6 trillion) are sufficient to have spent twice as much
as federal outlays in 1975, adjusted for inflation, with no deficit at all.
While life in these here United States was hellish on many levels in 1975,
not least the fashions and food, even those with a much bigger appetite for
government than I might agree that a government twice as big as what we
enjoyed/suffered that year should be able to manage its necessary functions.
(And no, there is no convincing reason that in a growing economy the
government’s cash grab as a percentage of GDP should remain stable.) When
contemplating California’s fiscal present and the U.S.’s fiscal future, it’s
not quite right to say that where California is now, the U.S. as a whole
will follow. The U.S. is already in a deep hole, much deeper than
California's, and has been for some time. Even President Barack Obama knows
it. He told C-SPAN recently, with wonderfully disarming frankness, 'we are
out of money now.'  The U.S., unlike the state of California, when faced
with a dearth of cash, can just make more, which is in essence Obama’s
plan—for a while, at least. As in his most famous movie role as the
Terminator, Schwarzenegger is metaphorically a visitor from a dangerous and
unpleasant future that awaits the rest of the United States. The Golden
State is absolutely a political bellwether now in the sense that the
crisis-induced fiscal seriousness Schwarzenegger is at least pretending to
attempt will be essential to the U.S. in the near future—and should be seen
as essential this very second. But while California can hold out hope that
the federal government might bail it out of its troubles, the U.S.
government, alas, has no higher power to which it can direct its own
appeals. The buck stops there. The only problem, as Obama himself claims to
understand, is they are all out of bucks."
Matt Welch: Blame the Voters, Pass the
Buck<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77608/0/>
Watch Welch on Fox News Discussing California's
Deficit<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77609/0/>

*Judge Sotomayor Revives the Affirmative Action
Debate*<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77602/0/>
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor's decision in the affirmative action
case *Ricci v. DeStefano* has reignited the discussion over racial
preferences. Reason magazine's Cathy Young says the issues must be
confronted: "With all the domestic and international problems we are
confronting today, affirmative action may seem like a relatively minor
issue. And yet it has major implications for individual rights, justice, and
race relations in America. The legacy of racism, and particularly the
dehumanizing oppression of generations of blacks, is a terrible blot on our
history. If we try to remedy it by maintaining a new system of racial
spoils—not at the expense of affluent, well-educated white elites, but of
working-class, disadvantaged people who happen to be white—the blot will
only deepen. So will racial division."
Reason Foundation's Amicus Brief on the *Ricci* Supreme Court
Case<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77610/0/>
Sotomayor, Cops, and Hate
Speech<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77611/0/>

*Congress Deceives Taxpayers on Cap-And-Trade Energy
Prices*<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77612/0/>
"The central fact of the cap-and-trade proposal is that it will increase the
price of energy. If energy prices don't go up, the goal of getting energy
producers, manufacturers, and consumers to shift away from carbon generating
fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) toward low-carbon sources of energy
(nuclear, solar, wind, conservation) will not be achieved...The chief
technique that Congress is using to hide the mandated price increase in
electricity and natural gas from voters is giving away free emissions
permits to local electricity and gas distribution companies...this plan to
allocate 'free' permits could well end up costing consumers even more than
they 'save' on their household electricity and natural gas bills. Fearing
the electoral consequences of honesty, Congress is trying to hide the fact
that they are increasing energy prices by distracting the American people
with a torrent of rebates, subsidies, and tax incentives, along with plenty
of happy talk about renewable energy and creating 'green jobs.' The result
is that Congress has devised a complicated and inefficient scheme where
distributing a 'free' commodity actually makes products and services more
expensive than it would otherwise have to be. That's truly 'wonderful
politics'!" - Reason magazine's Ronald Bailey examines the cap-and-trade
proposal and what it will mean to your electricity bill.
**
*New at Reason*

Urban Mass Transit Is Not a National
Problem<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77613/0/>
Transit is a local and sometimes regional function that should be paid for
locally
Robert Poole
 <http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77613/0/>
Obama's Betrayal On Don't Ask Don't
Tell<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77614/0/>
The president's forgotten civil rights promise
Shikha Dalmia

Reason.tv Video: "Free" Government Money With Matthew
Lesko!<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77615/0/>
Your slice of the bailout

Govs. Paterson, Schwarzenegger and Rendell: "The Moment for Public-Private
Partnerships Is Now" <http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77616/0/>
Hopefully DC is listening to these governors
Leonard Gilroy

NY State Commission, Governor Embrace Privatization for Infrastructure
Development <http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77617/0/>
A new and positive role for privatization and public-private partnerships
Leonard Gilroy

Schwarzenegger Outlines Need for Privatization, Budget Reform in
California<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77618/0/>
A major step forward
Leonard Gilroy

Florida IT Contract Draws
Scrutiny<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77619/0/>
The transition was difficult but the privatization is working
Leonard Gilroy

What Norm Coleman & Al Franken Have Taught
America<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77620/0/>
The Senate is carrying more dead weight than an Uruguayan rugby team
Nick Gillespie

Reason.tv Video: DMVs Ban
Smiles<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77621/0/>
Making a trip to the DMV more miserable

Reason.tv Video: How Churchill Became
Churchill<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77622/0/>
Nick Gillespie interviews Michael McMenamin

*Media Contact*:
Chris Mitchell
Director of Communications
Reason Foundation, Reason magazine, Reason.tv
(310) 367-6109

If you were forwarded this email and you would like to receive updates on
the latest Reason Foundation research, commentary and events, please click
here:
http://www.reason.org/reasonalert.shtml<http://sol.sparklist.com/t/4720986/28259383/77623/0/>

---
You are currently subscribed to reasonalert as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here:
http://sol.sparklist.com/u?id=28259383.fa97f8827c924bcd930f78a9fb0b3f31&n=T&l=reasonalert&o=4720986
or send a blank email to
leave-4720986-28259383.fa97f8827c924bcd930f78a9fb0b3...@sol.sparklist.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to