Here they are On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:04 AM, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
> > is not the case in Minnesota... Over 2,800 dead voter cast ballots > in the Minnesota Senate race were the winning margin is 312... That > is to say the dead plausibly will determine the new Minnesota > Senator... My simple question is why can't election officials at > least not purge dead voters??? > > Or is this an attempt to be Chicago??? > > > http://www.redstate.com/jrichardson/2009/06/04/minnesota-vote-fraud-2812-dead-voters/ > > >>> A review of Minnesota’s statewide database of registered voters > revealed at least 2,812 deceased individuals voted in last November’s > general election, according to a new report by the “traditional values” > advocacy group Minnesota Majority. > > After obtaining the list of voters who participated in November’s > election, the group hired an independent firm who specializes in > “death suppression” for direct mailing lists to review the data. The > process, which involved matching names and addresses to state death > records, bore troubling results. > > According to Minnesota statute 201.13, the commissioner of health is > to report monthly the name, address, date of birth, and county of > residence of voting-age deceased residents to the secretary of state. > > > -- *~@):~{> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
<<attachment: I_Vote_Democrat.jpg>>
