Travis, Tried to warn you numb-nuts about all of this. DHS and all the power given to the Executive office, etc. etc. No FISA warrants, secret detention, no acess to lawyers, etc. etc. Tried to tell you that power would be inherited by someone and that all the govt. had to do was label anyone they wanted "suspected terrorist" and they were screwed deprived of their rights. But nooooooooo, you were all pissing your panties in fear that "the terrorists" were gonna' get you and were willing to put up with anything just for the false illusion of safety.
Don't worry about the waterboarding thing. Like you lads say, nothing but a little cold shower. You could probably use a shower anyway. ENJOY dumbass. "He that would make his own liberty secure must gyard even his enemy fro oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself." Thomas Paine On Jun 11, 3:41 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > From: *Travis* > Date: Wed, Jun 10, 2009 > Subject: Obama Régime Is Coming After YOU AND ME > > - * > * > > Patriotic Resistance <http://www.resistnet.com/> > > - * > * > > *Obama Régime Is Coming After YOU AND ME* > > - *Posted by **John > Pierre-Benoist*<http://www.resistnet.com/profile/JohnPierreBenoist> > * on June 8, 2009 at 8:00pm* > - *View John Pierre-Benoist's > blog***<http://www.resistnet.com/profiles/blog/list?user=2iqxr8b0cfiz5> > > [from: RightMarch.com > PAC]http://www.resistnet.com/profiles/blogs/obama-regime-is-coming-after > *********************************************************** > Obama Régime Is Coming After YOU AND ME > > ALERT: By now, you probably already know that your own government considers > you to be a "rightwing extremist." > > As an informed conservative, you probably already know that that same > government wants to cut off your ability to respond to its accusations > against you; you probably already know that that same government is trying > to take over the Internet and shut down conservative talk radio in order to > accomplish that goal. > > You’ve already heard all this… but now, the Left has kicked into HIGH GEAR > against conservatives. Now, because a single late-term abortionist was shot, > they want to use it as an excuse to take away ALL of your rights to protest, > or even voice your own opinion! > > IT'S TRUE! > > As everyone has heard by now, the Department of Homeland Security issued a > warning to law enforcement officials a few weeks ago about a rise in > "rightwing extremist activity," labeling citizens opposed to new firearms > restrictions, returning veterans and conservatives as "rightwing extremists" > and associating them with white supremacists and violent antigovernment > groups. > > It was right there in black and white -- and it made it obvious that the > Obama Administration, and especially the DHS under Janet Napolitano, is > trying to demonize political dissent. And it's no big surprise who is > directly in their crosshairs: CONSERVATIVES, including anyone who is > "antagonistic toward the new presidential administration and its perceived > stance on a range of issues, including immigration and citizenship, the > expansion of social programs to minorities, and restrictions on firearms > ownership and use." > > Oh, and throw in anyone who rejects "federal authority in favor of state or > local authority," "the expansion of social programs to minorities," or is > "dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or > immigration." And don't forget the always-to-be-feared "disgruntled military > veterans"! > > TODAY, thanks to the new "crisis" of the shooting of late-term abortionist > George Tiller, pro-lifers are in the crosshairs. TOMORROW, it will be > everyone else! > > This calls for grassroots action, on a HUGE scale! > > TELL CONGRESS TO PROTECT AMERICANS WHO ARE ON BARACK OBAMA'S NEW "ENEMIES > LIST": > > Barack Obama's Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanuel, said this not long ago: "You > never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that, it's an > opportunity to do things you think you could not do before." Hillary Clinton > agreed with him just afterward, saying, "Never waste a good crisis." > > They meant it. According to LifeNews.com, "The apparent shooter of late-term > abortion practitioner George Tiller was never involved in a pro-life group > and, by his own actions, wasn't pro-life. But abortion advocates are quickly > taking to calling the majority of Americans who are pro-life, ‘terrorists,' > in the first day following his death." > > Kim Gandy, the head of the pro-abortion National Organization for Women, was > first: "Bringing the killers to justice is not enough," said Gandy, "the > Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security must root out and > prosecute as domestic terrorists and violent racketeers the criminal > enterprise that has organized and funded criminal acts for decades." > > She went on to say the pro-life movement was guilty of > "politically-motivated domestic terrorism" and called on the Obama > administration to aggressively target pro-life Americans. > > Peter Brownlie, president of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri > also used the term: "We're not going to let the terrorists win," he told the > Kansas City Star newspaper. > > The Huffington Post wrote, "Tiller was the subject of assassination > attempts, violence, and, by definition, terrorism in the past," and Andrew > Sullivan of The Atlantic labeled the death "Christianist terrorism." > > Bonnie Erbe, of U.S. News and World Report, titled her blog response, > "Tiller Murder Is Terrorism, and All Pro-Life Extremists Are to Blame." She > said anyone who describes abortion as the killing of babies "ought to be > prosecuted as an accessory to murder, as well as for partaking in domestic > terrorism." > > Do you get it? If you are opposed to abortion, you are a terrorist, because > some whacko who wasn't connected to ANY pro-life group shot and killed an > abortionist who killed 60,000 babies in their eighth month in the womb. > > Whatever your stand on the abortion issue… even if you just don't want your > tax dollars to pay for abortion... YOU are a right-wing extremist, and > they're going to do all they can now to "not waste this crisis" and come > against YOUR rights to protest and speak out. > > This is only the LATEST attack by the Left on conservatives who disagree > with them! As if that first DHS report wasn't bad enough… the Department of > Homeland Security's Office of Intelligence and Analysis -- the same unit > that produced the report on right-wing extremists -- then released a NEW > report, titled the "Domestic Extremism Lexicon," meant to define terms used > when analyzing dozens of supposedly "extremist ideologies" inside the United > States. > > So what did this "dictionary" of extremist groups cover? Well, for starters: > Jewish extremists, animal rights extremists, Christian identity extremists, > black separatism extremists, anti-abortion extremists, anti-immigration > extremists, anti-technology extremists, Cuban independence extremists and > tax resistance extremists, to name a few. > > That's right: Whites and blacks, Christians and Jews, Cubans and Mexicans, > along with tax-hating Americans, are ALL in DHS' "Domestic Extremism > Lexicon." > > The first DHS report also said that Congressional debates about immigration > and gun control make "extremist groups" suspicious and give them a rallying > cry: > > "It is unclear if either bill will be passed into law; nonetheless, a > correlation may exist between the potential passage of gun control > legislation and increased hoarding of ammunition, weapons stockpiling, and > paramilitary training activities among rightwing extremists," the report > said. > > Why are they worried? Because since November, more than 7 million people > have applied for criminal background checks in order to buy weapons. And as > far as the Obama administration is concerned, buying guns equals "weapons > stockpiling," buying ammo equals "hoarding of ammunition," and expressing > concern about Congress passing gun control legislation qualifies YOU as part > of an "extremist group." > > Therefore, you and I are now being viewed as dangerous rightwing extremists > that law enforcement officials need to be watching out for! > > According to the federal government, characteristics of members of the > suspect group of people include those who: > > • Oppose restrictions on firearms > • Oppose lax immigration > • Oppose the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship > and the expansion of social programs > • Oppose continuation of free trade agreements > • Oppose same-sex marriage > • Has paranoia of foreign regimes > • Fear Communist regimes > • Oppose one world government > • Bemoan the decline of U.S. stature in the world > • Is upset with the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and India > > This is OUTRAGEOUS! > > This report was released "hot on the heels" of another (state) government > agency report in February: the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) > report titled, "MIAC Strategic Report: The Modern Militia Movement." In this > horrific "law enforcement sensitive" secret police report, Governor Jeremiah > (Jay) Nixon; John Britt, Director of the Missouri Department of Public > Safety; James Keathley, Colonel, Missouri State Highway Patrol; and Van > Godsey, Director of MIAC categorize certain citizens as being potential > violence-prone "militia members." > > According to the MIAC report, if you oppose any of the following, you could > qualify for being profiled as a potential dangerous "militia member": > > • The United Nations > • The New World Order > • Gun Control > • The violation of Posse Comitatus > • The Federal Reserve > • The Income Tax > • The Ammunition and Accountability Act > • A possible Constitutional Convention > • The North American Union > • Universal Service Program > • Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) > • Abortion > • Illegal Immigration > > Well, there you have it! You see? You ARE a dangerous rightwing extremist! > > As ridiculous as that report seems, it was distributed to law enforcement > officials across the state of Missouri. And it wasn't until the state > government was FLOODED with protests from patriotic Americans across the > country, that they finally came out and denounced and retracted the MIAC > document. > > Now, it's happened again -- but this time, at the Federal level! Our own > government is turning against us, and unless there is a HUGE outpouring of > outrage from every part of this nation, it will just keep getting WORSE! > > Interestingly enough, no left-leaning political ideologies were identified > in the first report. No Islamic extremists. No environmental extremists. > Only people holding "conservative" or "right-wing" philosophies were > identified in BOTH the MIAC report AND the Homeland Security "assessment." > > This shouldn't be too surprising: both of these reports are similar to > several other reports currently circulating around various State police > agencies, courtesy of DHS-sponsored "Fusion Centers." MIAC is one of those > Centers, sponsored by the DHS! > > So now, even veterans are targets of our own government: The Homeland > Security assessment specifically says that "rightwing extremists will > attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit > their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat." > > PLEASE, don't think we're making a "big deal" out of nothing! Homeland > Security spokeswoman Sara Kuban specifically told the press, "This is > nothing unusual," and added that the Homeland Security Department did this > "to prevent another Tim McVeigh from ever happening again." > > The authors of the DHS assessment are pushing an "Us against Them" > philosophy. You and I are being marginalized -- labeled as fringe kooks, > "rightwing extremists," so that it will be easier to violate our liberties > and take away our political rights in the future. > > Think of it: The Obama administration is quickly developing its own "Enemies > List" of who it needs to target, to shut down opposition to its radical > socialist agenda. > > So how do Obama's leftist minions propose to shut us down? > > SIMPLE: Cut off our ability to respond to such accusations and official > "assessments," by TAKING OVER THE INTERNET and SHUTTING DOWN CONSERVATIVE > TALK RADIO. > > For example, according to news reports, two new Senate bills -- S. 773 and > S. 778 – "would grant the White House sweeping new powers to access private > online data, regulate the cyber security industry and even shut down > Internet traffic during a declared ‘cyber emergency.'" > > These two new bills are both part of what's being called the "Cyber security > Act of 2009." The Act would create a new bureaucracy, the "Office of the > National Cyber security Advisor," which would be charged with "defending the > country from cyber attack"… and would report directly to Barack Obama. > > But that's not all it would do: it would also grant the Secretary of > Commerce access to all privately owned information networks deemed to be > "critical" to the nation's infrastructure, "without regard to any provision > of law, regulation, rule or policy restricting such access." > > Did you read that? The Secretary of Commerce, reporting directly to Mr. > Obama, would be able to snoop through ANYTHING connected to the Internet > that a President decides is "critical" to look at. And it doesn't matter > what the law says -- they get to do this whenever and wherever a President > wants them to. > > Talk about UNCONSTITUTIONAL! We MUST NOT let Barack Obama's cronies in > Congress get away with this! > > The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution states: > > "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and > effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, > and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or > affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the > persons or things to be seized." > > It's clear: giving the U.S. Department of Commerce oversight of the > "critical" networks -- like banking records -- would give the federal > government access to confidential, private information obtained without > cause or warrant, which is a CLEAR violation of the U.S. Constitution's > prohibition against unlawful search and seizure! > > What exactly are these "critical infrastructure networks" that Barack Obama > would have the power to "take offline" whenever he wants to? The examples > they give are things like "banking, utilities, air/rail/auto traffic > control, and telecommunications." > > WHAT??? Exactly HOW do you take the telecommunications networks off of the > Internet, when that's what the Internet is comprised of? And if YOUR bank > gets taken offline, don't you think you might go into your branch and ask > for all of your deposits in cash? Don't you think EVERYONE might do that? > > According to one Senate document that attempts to "explain" the bills, this > Act "addresses our country's unacceptable vulnerability to massive cyber > crime, global cyber espionage and cyber attacks that could cripple our > critical infrastructure." > > In a statement explaining the bill's introduction, liberal Democratic West > Virginia U. S. Senator Jay Rockefeller said, "We must protect our critical > infrastructure at all costs – from our water to our electricity, to banking, > traffic lights and electronic health records – the list goes on." > > Senator Olympia Snowe, a liberal Republican from Maine who is co-sponsoring > the bill, gave us this dire warning: "If we fail to take swift action, we, > regrettably, risk a cyber-Katrina." > > In other words, we need to give up our freedoms and liberties in order for > the government to give us "security." > > What was it that Benjamin Franklin once said? "Those who would give up > Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety deserve neither > Liberty nor Safety." > > WE MUST NOT GIVE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THESE ABSOLUTE POWERS! > > Why would anyone push such a bill? Because if Obama controls the Internet, > he can cut off our ability to respond to his administration's attacks on > YOU, ME and every other conservative in America! > > NO, we're not paranoid -- because you're not paranoid if they really ARE out > to get you! > > You see, it doesn't stop there -- also on Obama's "Enemies List" is one more > form of alternative media that he is otherwise powerless to stop: > Conservative Talk Radio. And they're very clear about HOW they're going to > shut it down: > > The Fairness Doctrine. > > The "Fairness Doctrine" -- a federal regulation requiring broadcasters to > present both sides of any "controversial" issue -- was enforced by the > Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from 1949 to 1987. The FCC adopted > it as a regulation, but it was never a law enacted by Congress. > > When the rule was in place, radio and TV stations could face huge fines if > their stations aired controversial statements on public affairs without > providing "equal time" to opposing viewpoints. The result was > self-censorship by broadcasters who avoided politics to escape any potential > government retaliation. > > When this rule was dropped in 1987, under President Ronald Reagan, it led > directly to the rise of conservative talk radio that enabled average > citizens to have their voices heard across America. If it weren't for the > Reagan administration dropping the "Fairness Doctrine," we would never have > heard of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glen Beck, Michael Savage, Michael > Reagan, Martha Zoller, Neal Boortz, Janet Folger, or the hundreds of other > conservative talk radio hosts that dot the land and expose the lies and > misdeeds of the Left. > > And THAT is why Barack Obama and his left-wing friends want to bring back > the "Fairness Doctrine" -- this time, as a LAW. Because if they can get it > passed as a LAW, they can cut off one of our biggest means of responding to > their attacks, and disproving their LIES! > > Up until 1987, the Fairness Doctrine mandated that when a broadcast station > presented one viewpoint on a "controversial" public issue, it also had to > air the opposing viewpoint. Sounds "fair," right? > > WRONG. The so-called "Fairness Doctrine" did nothing but stifle any real > public debate on the airwaves. What station manager in his right mind would > air a (profitable) conservative talk radio show for two or three hours every > day, if it meant he had to also air liberal shows as well -- shows that have > consistently LOST money whenever they've been tried? > > Repealed by an FCC vote of 4-0, it was concluded that the "Fairness > Doctrine" had begun to inhibit political discourse, rather than enhance it. > > The Democrat Congress tried to reinstate the doctrine, but President Reagan > vetoed their attempt. Again, in 1991, another attempt to revive the doctrine > failed when President George H. W. Bush threatened a veto. > > Now, with Barack Obama in the White House, and with liberal Democrats > Senator Harry Reid and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi reigning over a > Democrat-controlled Congress, they're already talking about trying to SHUT > US DOWN AGAIN -- and this time, they might succeed... unless YOU AND I take > action to stop them NOW, before they are able to mobilize support for this > insidious attempt to SILENCE CONSERVATIVES! > > Nothing frightens those who peddle lies more than the cold hard light of > TRUTH. They react to exposure of their deceits the way vampires react to a > crucifix held up in front of them. > > Ever since the birth of conservative talk radio and the Internet ended the > liberals' total monopoly over the news, the left has been simmering with > rage -- because of the loss of their absolute control over what Americans > are allowed to see and hear, and their inability to do anything about it! > > Time and time again, liberal attempts to sell the nation their shoddy goods > have been frustrated when talk-radio hosts have taken to the airwaves and > warned their millions of listeners that they were about to be taken to the > cleaners. > > It wasn't until McCain/Kennedy's fatally flawed "immigration reform" AMNESTY > bill -- that seemed destined for passage -- was derailed by an army of angry > voters recruited by talk radio hosts and conservative Internet websites, > that the left understood both the incredible power of the new media, and > their utter helplessness in the face of it. > > Clearly, they felt that something had do be done. And that's when they came > up with the idea to bring back the "Fairness Doctrine" -- but this time, as > a LAW. > > Really, what they're trying to do shows just how desperate the liberals have > become. Without conservative talk radio, and conservative internet websites, > to keep an eye on them, the Left's failure to accomplish their stated goals > since winning control of the Congress would have been covered up by the > liberal controlled "mainstream media." > > Conservative voices on talk radio and the Internet are the left's worst > nightmare -- their monitoring of the liberals' activities have been shining > the light of truth on the Left's attempts to deceive the nation, so now the > Left is trying to do whatever it takes to silence us. > > Like all Marxists, the liberals won't stop trying to LIE their way into > power. As a result, they won't stop trying to destroy conservative talk > radio, conservative internet sites, and groups like ours -- those of us who > are more than willing to ACTIVATE the grassroots to help EXPOSE their lies. > You can be certain that they'll push HARD for a new "Fairness Doctrine" or > some other way to silence the voices of common sense and truth in America. > > But you can be just as certain that we will NOT let them succeed! > > As grassroots conservatives, we MUST take action to stop them NOW, before > they are able to mobilize support for this insidious attempt to SILENCE > CONSERVATIVES! > > Just piece the whole puzzle together: the Obama administration releases > reports that label any Conservative as a potential "rightwing extremist"… > the Obama administration wants to be able to completely take over the > Internet during whatever he proclaims is an "emergency"… the Obama > administration wants to shut down talk radio to silence its strongest > critics… the Obama administration and their supporters view pro-lifers as > "domestic terrorists"… > > It's plain to see: Conservatives like YOU and ME are on Obama's ENEMIES > LIST! > > The only thing that will put a STOP to this nonsense is a huge public outcry > opposing it. If we do nothing, however, it will soon be too late to do > anything. We either stop it NOW, or it will grow into an out-of-control > monster that will monitor and control the personal opinions and speech of > every man, woman, and child in this country. > > And don't be fooled by phony "apologies" issued by Secretary Napolitano or > others for those leaked reports. When American veterans expressed > understandable outrage at the report's targeting of vets as being > susceptible recruitment by terrorist groups, her response was, "I apologize > for that offense. It was certainly not intended." In other words, "I'm sorry > you were offended -- it's YOUR fault for taking it the wrong way!" > > The Executive Branch of the U.S. government is coming after us. As patriotic > Americans, we need to seek relief from the other branches of government – > first of all, by DEMANDING that these outrageous DHS reports be CONDEMNED by > our Representatives in Congress, and RETRACTED by the Obama administration; > by demanding that the U.S. government REPUDIATE any person or organization > that refers to pro-life individuals and groups as "terrorists"; and by > demanding that Congress REJECT any attempt to bring back the so-called > "Fairness Doctrine." Please, CLICK HERE NOW to send Blast Faxes to EVERY > SINGLE MEMBER OF CONGRESS, telling them to take action on these issues > TODAY! > > Sincerely, > William Greene, President > RightMarch.com PA > > __,_._,___ > > -- > *~@):~{> > > -- > *~@):~{> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
