Popular Comment
of course Baldassare would say that. the ppic is a left leaning group. it would be nice to see the poll that they ran. the voting public doesn't want anymore taxes period.

-- mdimond57

Leave your comment
Capitol and California

Pollsters evaluate California special election results

Published: Wednesday, Jun. 17, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 3A

Two of California's top pollsters said Tuesday that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and some lawmakers are miscasting last month's special election as a clarion call against any new taxes to solve California's fiscal crisis.

Instead, pollsters Mark DiCamillo and Mark Baldassare characterized the May 19 vote against five budget measures as an order to a dysfunctional state government to fix California's budget mess – and do so quickly.

"We've heard a lot of people say the vote means 'no new taxes.' I would question that," said Baldassare, survey director for the Public Policy Institute of California, in the pollsters' joint appearance before the Sacramento Press Club.

DiCamillo, director of the California Field Poll, said pre-election polling indicated voters favored a blend of spending cuts and "targeted taxes rather than sweeping taxes."

DiCamillo said voters opposed expanding sales taxes or boosting taxes on businesses or gasoline. But he said they widely favored "sin taxes" targeting pornography, alcohol and tobacco and strongly backed hiking income taxes on people earning more than $1 million a year.

Baldassare said the election turnout of just 28 percent of registered voters skewed strongly conservative. He said half of voters were age 55 and over and a near equal number of Republicans as Democrats turned out in a blue state.

"The vote in this election, which for some time has been described as reflecting the will of the people, doesn't reflect the will of the people," Baldassare said.

He added that PPIC surveys leading up to the election "consistently" showed "a plurality of Californians saying they favor a mix of tax increases and spending cuts."

But DiCamillo said anti-tax sentiments were likely fueled by one key initiative – Proposition 1A – because voters believed lawmakers, in the official ballot summary, deliberately hid the fact that the measure would have extended sales, vehicle and income tax hikes for two years.

DiCamillo said polling showed voters had little idea what the May 19 initiatives would do – yet knew from news reports that Proposition 1A would trigger extended taxes.

Baldassare said defeat of the budget initiatives – and passage of a measure to cap lawmakers' pay in deficit years – reflected "voters' accumulated negative image" of the Legislature and governor.

"This should serve as a warning that they need to avoid delays and pass this budget," he said.


Call Peter Hecht, Bee Capitol Bureau, (916) 326-5539.


About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at [email protected]. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to [email protected]. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

Add a comment (max 1000 characters)

Comments: 8      Showing: Oldest first Newest first Most-recommended first Least-recommended first

  • Dukeofhighpoint wrote on 06/17/2009 04:52:33 AM:

    I voted against them primarily because I think they are trying to avoid their responsibility.I am not in favor of any new taxes on business or people who are trying to get by on a salary. Tax booze,tobacco all they want since they cause most of the social problems that we all have to pay for. Spending needs to be cut. The real problem is the tax base has shrunk and the solution is to increase the tax base. That means bring business to the state rather than drive it out.I don`t believe they have a clue about how to do this. The immediate problem is to fix the budget, but they need to start working on how to get more money into the state as soon as they fumble through this crises.They won`t because we have an ineffective governor and a dysfunctional legislature.

  • pressto wrote on 06/17/2009 04:47:13 AM:

    "We've heard a lot of people say the vote means 'no new taxes.' I would question that,said Baldassare, survey director for the Public Policy Institute of California,"

    Is this guy smoking something illegal in his hookah? Oh wait, this is the PPIC which has not been accurate in it's polls, so never mind.

  • rdsmith47 wrote on 06/17/2009 04:45:33 AM:

    Pure spin to soften up the beaches for a new round of tax increases. First of all, PPIC is a left leaning "think" tank (oxymoron?) that passes itself off as a so-called "good government" group. If you check out their Bee-ess linked website , you'll see they're really just a "big government" group dominated by academics who don't know how to run anything.
    Look how well these people have screwed up what used to the best state college and university system in the world. It's been turned it into a racially biased, politically correct sewer turning out poorly educated,mindless Obamatrons by the thousands.
    Oh, and people didn't mind all the tax increases? Well they did not go into effect until after the election. (How convenient that was, huh?.. wouldn't want to tick people off before they vote.)
    By now lots of people are receiving their new car license renewals and are going to be shocked by what they see.
    The anger over the new tax increases is just beginning.

  • redbyrd wrote on 06/17/2009 04:40:43 AM:

    Such a bunch of erroneous assumptions.

    Those who voted very simply and clearly sent a message to our elected officials - stop abdicating your responsibility to those whom you are elected to represent, expecting us to clean up your mess. In others words it absolutely is not about the people not wanting tax increases nor program cuts - it's all about our "representatives" needing to stop playing politics and do their damn jobs. If you don't get that simple message, you will surely get it when you come up for re-election. We are fed up with the mess you guys have created and want something productive to come of your time, efforts, and large salary, benefits, and perks you receive as compensation for doing that job.

    If you can't see that, or don't get it, it is time for you to move on.

  • hpbromine wrote on 06/17/2009 04:06:57 AM:

    I voted against all of the measures because they represented a piece-meal and incomplete attempt to resolve the state's budget crisis and because they were put forth by an incredibly arrogant and delusional state legislature. It had nothing at all to do with taxes, which I think probably represent the most fair means of distributing the financial pain the legislature's failure to act responsibly over the last 6 years has visited upon all of us. I resent the invalid and self-serving suggestion that I cast a vote against new taxes. I most definitely did not.

  • mdimond57 wrote on 06/17/2009 03:32:29 AM:

    of course Baldassare would say that. the ppic is a left leaning group. it would be nice to see the poll that they ran. the voting public doesn't want anymore taxes period.

  • GAWnCA wrote on 06/17/2009 03:10:48 AM:

    I think spending should be cut before any more taxes or fees are imposed. Even a drunk knows that when he runs out of money and friends he has to stop spending what he doesn't have.

    The more you tax the more that is passed on down the line to recover those lost revenues. Who in their right mind really thinks adding new taxes will do any good? All it will do is give more revenue to these politicians more money to burn. They won't correct their spending until they have nothing left to spend and no one will give them credit. This is the problem in D.C. as well, except D.C. can print more money than it can back.

  • Deborah1 wrote on 06/16/2009 10:14:41 PM:

    That is what I have been trying to say for a while now...

More comments on this story: 1


Reply via email to