yes but do either of you have plans to bomb or kill any Americans for
religious or ethnic reasons, anytime soon?

In any case, I think the legislation is just political grand-standing.
She has to know it won't pass.

On Jun 30, 10:56 am, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> That is two of us.
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:09 AM, RICHARD BROWN <
>
>
>
>
>
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > As a "TERRORIST" that favors local government over state or federal, I
> > should probably be put on some kind of list.  My ideas are definitely
> > a threat to the established order of ruling the unthinking masses.
>
> > On Jun 29, 11:05 am, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > From: *Travis*
> > > Date: Mon, Jun 29, 2009
> > > Subject:  Corrupt Representative's Amendment to Label Americans
> > Terrorists
>
> > >http://www.examiner.com/x-2684-Law-Enforcement-Examiner~y2009m6d29-Re...
>
> > >  Rep. Hastings' defense amendment to label Americans 'terrorists'
> > > June 29, 6:39 AM · Jim Kouri - Law Enforcement Examiner
>
> > > Impeached Florida judge -- now a Democrat Party member of the House of
> > > Representatives -- Rep. Alcee Hastings introduced what some claim is a
> > > disturbing piece of legislation. The new bill calls for the Attorney
> > General
> > > to have discretion over who is called a terrorist and what groups will be
> > > listed and treated as terrorist groups.
>
> > > In an unclassified report entitled "Rightwing Extremism:  Current
> > Economic
> > > and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and
> > > Recruitment,"  Secretary for Homeland Security Janet Napolitano and her
> > > agency included the following description of "extremists:"
>
> > > *"Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into
> > those
> > > groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based
> > on
> > > hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that
> > are
> > > mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or
> > > local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may
> > include
> > > groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as
> > > opposition to abortion or immigration."*
>
> > > On Thursday, Congressman Trent Franks (R-AZ)  made the following remarks
> > on
> > > the House Floor regarding Congressman Alcee Hastings’ (D-FL) amendment to
> > > the National Defense Authorization bill:
>
> > > "The Hastings Amendment to the National Defense Authorization bill (which
> > > now is being considered *en bloc*) prohibits the recruitment, enlistment,
> > or
> > > retention of persons with known affiliations to "groups determined by the
> > > Attorney General to be of a violent, extremist nature."
>
> > > "Members on both sides of the aisle support the purpose of this amendment
> > > because we recognize that there are legitimate concerns about the
> > enlistment
> > > of persons who may seek to use their military training to cause harm to
> > > innocents, but we should take pause to consider the breadth of this
> > > amendment carefully.  I just want to express concern about the language
> > of
> > > this amendment, and my concerns are shared by many in this House.
>
> > > "While the amendment seeks to keep gang members and members of violent
> > > groups out of the military, the amendment by its language is much more
> > > broad.  Specifically, it confers upon the Attorney General the ability to
> > > categorize groups as hate groups, and this sounds an alarm for many of us
> > > because of the recent shocking and offensive report released by the
> > > Department of Homeland Security which labeled, arguably, a majority of
> > > Americans as "extremists."
>
> > > "I take extreme offense that the federal government -- through a report
> > > issued under the authority of a Cabinet-level official -- would dare to
> > > categorize people who are "dedicated to a single issue, such as
> > opposition
> > > or abortion or immigration" as "right-wing extremists" and it begs the
> > > question of whether the Attorney General, under Mr. Hastings' Amendment,
> > can
> > > look to the Napolitano report to decide who is an extremist, or can make
> > the
> > > same categorization of the majority of Americans as extremists who may
> > then
> > > be kept from joining the military, or who may be discharged.
>
> > > "The desire to risk one's life on foreign soil for one's country may well
> > be
> > > considered "extreme."  To spill blood on a foreign battlefield in the
> > name
> > > of freedom requires extreme devotion.
>
> > > "This amendment could have been written in a way that is more consistent
> > > with current DOD policy, which prohibits military personnel from
> > > participating in "organizations that espouse supremacist causes; or
> > attempt
> > > to create illegal discrimination based on race, creed, color, sex,
> > religion,
> > > or national origin..."
>
> > > "The military has many laws and regulations in place to counter racism
> > and
> > > the enlistment of racist militants.  Recruits must be thoroughly vetted,
> > and
> > > must even explain the symbolism behind their tattoos, body markings and
> > > writings.  I understand that there is concern that the rules and
> > regulations
> > > governing vetting of recruits are not being followed as vigilantly as
> > they
> > > could be, and this is a legitimate cause for concern.  At the same time,
> > > this is a call for better enforcement of the laws in place, rather than a
> > > sweeping categorization of persons as "extremists," as we saw in Janet
> > > Napolitano's agency's report.
>
> > > "I want to state unequivocally that I believe that it is not the intent
> > of
> > > this Congress to label pro-lifers, federalism proponents, and
> > > pro-immigration enforcement groups and their affiliates as extremists
> > under
> > > the bill.  My colleagues on the other side of the aisle should make a
> > strong
> > > effort to assuage these concerns and make our intentions clear.  If the
> > > intent of this amendment is to go after citizens because of their
> > political
> > > views and moral convictions, then the amendment is unconstitutional. I
> > hope
> > > that the sponsor of the Amendment will make clear tonight that this is
> > not
> > > the intent."
>
> > > *Jim Kouri, CPP is currently fifth vice-president of the National
> > > Association of Chiefs of Police and he's a staff writer for the New Media
> > > Alliance (thenma.org).  In addition, he's the new editor for the House
> > > Conservatives Fund's weblog. Kouri also serves as political advisor for
> > Emmy
> > > and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty.
>
> > > He's former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington
> > Heights
> > > nicknamed "Crack City" by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s.
> > In
> > > addition, he served as director of public safety at a New Jersey
> > university
> > > and director of security for several major organizations.  He's also
> > served
> > > on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers
> > > throughout the country.   Kouri writes for many police and security
> > > magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and
> > > others. He's a news writer for TheConservativeVoice.Com and PHXnews.com.
> > > He's also a columnist for AmericanDaily.Com, MensNewsDaily.Com,
> > > MichNews.Com, and he's syndicated by AXcessNews.Com.   He's appeared as
> > > on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows
> > including
> > > Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, Fox News, etc.
>
> > > *
>
> > > __,_._,___
>
> > > --
> > > *~@):~{>
>
> > > --
> > > *~@):~{>
>
> > >  naco-150x159(2).jpg
> > > 13KViewDownload
>
> > >  DHS(2).jpg
> > > 6KViewDownload
>
> --
> *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to