The Latest from Cafe Hayek <http://www.cafehayek.com/hayek/>
<http://fusion.google.com/add?source=atgs&feedurl=http://feeds.feedburner.com/CafeHayek>
------------------------------

   - Paul Graham, hacker (by Russell Roberts) <#1226457b94cdaae6_1>
   - Economics is hard (by Russell Roberts) <#1226457b94cdaae6_2>
   - Whitman on Thaler (by Russell Roberts) <#1226457b94cdaae6_3>
   - Oily Speculations (by Don Boudreaux) <#1226457b94cdaae6_4>

  Paul Graham, hacker (by Russell
Roberts)<http://www.cafehayek.com/hayek/2009/07/paul-graham-hacker.html>

Posted: 09 Jul 2009 05:41 PM PDT

Does anyone have contact info for Paul
Graham<http://www.paulgraham.com/index.html>,
author of Hackers and
Painters<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0596006624/invisiblehear-20>
?
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=G9oNFo8OfT8:gtX-BWaSs1Y:yIl2AUoC8zA>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=G9oNFo8OfT8:gtX-BWaSs1Y:dnMXMwOfBR0>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=G9oNFo8OfT8:gtX-BWaSs1Y:F7zBnMyn0Lo>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=G9oNFo8OfT8:gtX-BWaSs1Y:V_sGLiPBpWU>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=G9oNFo8OfT8:gtX-BWaSs1Y:gIN9vFwOqvQ>

Economics is hard (by Russell
Roberts)<http://www.cafehayek.com/hayek/2009/07/economics-is-hard.html>

Posted: 09 Jul 2009 04:28 PM PDT

You could teach on course on the errors in this
poster<http://www.fulltable.com/VTS/a/am/vv/26.jpg>(HT:
michelediane <http://twitter.com/michelediane>). Assuming it is real and
that someone or some group in 1943 thought this made sense or that people
would think that it did, is a testament to how hard economics is.
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=_TAF8tq4mms:RqGV5Fs6NV0:yIl2AUoC8zA>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=_TAF8tq4mms:RqGV5Fs6NV0:dnMXMwOfBR0>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=_TAF8tq4mms:RqGV5Fs6NV0:F7zBnMyn0Lo>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=_TAF8tq4mms:RqGV5Fs6NV0:V_sGLiPBpWU>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=_TAF8tq4mms:RqGV5Fs6NV0:gIN9vFwOqvQ>

Whitman on Thaler (by Russell
Roberts)<http://www.cafehayek.com/hayek/2009/07/whitman-on-thaler.html>

Posted: 09 Jul 2009 01:21 PM PDT

Glen gets it 
right<http://agoraphilia.blogspot.com/2009/07/thaler-on-ski-slopes-and-mortgages.html>.
(HT: Seth Goldin <http://twitter.com/sethgoldin>)
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=P1TngfkLd_E:-FjSN0wInig:yIl2AUoC8zA>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=P1TngfkLd_E:-FjSN0wInig:dnMXMwOfBR0>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=P1TngfkLd_E:-FjSN0wInig:F7zBnMyn0Lo>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=P1TngfkLd_E:-FjSN0wInig:V_sGLiPBpWU>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=P1TngfkLd_E:-FjSN0wInig:gIN9vFwOqvQ>

Oily Speculations (by Don
Boudreaux)<http://www.cafehayek.com/hayek/2009/07/oily-speculations.html>

Posted: 09 Jul 2009 04:41 AM PDT

Here's a letter that I sent yesterday to WTOP radio
<http://www.wtop.com/>(103.5 and 107.7 on your FM dial in and near
DC):
News Editor, WTOP Radio
Washington, DC

Dear Sir or Madam:

This morning your anchors interviewed University of Maryland law professor
Michael Greenberger on President Obama's plan to reduce speculation in oil
markets.  Mr. Greenberger's answers revealed his own confusion.

Most obviously, Mr. Greenberger repeatedly objected to persons investing in
oil futures "passively" - as he said, "with no interest in actively
controlling these assets, just hoping to make a buck when their prices
rise."  Ummm.... Does Mr. Greenberger own stocks only in companies that he
actively manages?  If not, why is it okay for him passively (and
speculatively!) to buy, say, a few dozen shares of Microsoft "hoping to make
a buck when their prices rise" but not okay for other persons to speculate
in oil for the very same reason?

Second, Mr. Greenberger presumes that all speculators speculate long
*and*that doing so is a sure thing.  Neither presumption is valid.
It's just as
easy to speculate short as it is to speculate long.  And if speculation were
as risklessly profitable as Mr. Greenberger presumes it to be, then high
gasoline prices would pose no problem because everyone and their
grandmothers would be raking in riches by speculating in oil markets.

Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=xKsq3XklDpQ:HF9Adm8-VoQ:yIl2AUoC8zA>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=xKsq3XklDpQ:HF9Adm8-VoQ:dnMXMwOfBR0>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=xKsq3XklDpQ:HF9Adm8-VoQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=xKsq3XklDpQ:HF9Adm8-VoQ:V_sGLiPBpWU>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/CafeHayek?a=xKsq3XklDpQ:HF9Adm8-VoQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ>
   You are subscribed to email updates from Cafe
Hayek<http://www.cafehayek.com/hayek/>
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe
now<http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailunsubscribe?k=RD87GWo2xMyNcdDv2g6ct6FC7Lk>
.Email delivery powered by Google  Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL
USA 60610

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to