In what way did Palin use which daughter?
All candidates have their children appear at events

How is she a complete idiot and yet has managed to achieve more than you
have?

On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Frederick The Moderate <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I absolutely agree that the MSM (except FOX) was biased toward Obama
> during the elections.
> I still think Palin is a complete idiot who made a prop out of her
> daughter at the worst possible time in that young girls life, but
> there is no doubt the media was biased during the elections.
> I think a lot of the reason for the biased was that so many of the
> reporters just plain liked the Dem ticket better, personally. Imagine
> if you had to cover Obama during the campaign and be positive and
> objective! I bet it wouldn't be easy for you.
>
> On Jul 12, 1:56 pm, Perplexed <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This is BY FAR the best account I've seen from anyone detailing the
> > atrocious liberal media bias in the 2008 presidential election.
> >
> > The part detailing the VP debate is excellent and contains many
> > criticisms I'd NEVER read about Biden's performance that night...
> >
> > Gov. Palin certainly had her sketchy moments that night. On one
> > occasion, she called her opponent "Senator O'Biden." She referred
> > twice to the top U.S. military officer in Afghanistan as "General
> > McClellan." (His name is David McKiernan). She claimed as mayor to
> > have reduced taxes "every year I was in office," an assertion that is
> > accurate only if one ignores sales tax increases. Likewise, she
> > maintained that McCain's $5,000 tax credit for health coverage was
> > "budget-neutral," which is only possible by repealing the laws of
> > mathematics. She gave McCain more credit than he was due in blowing
> > the whistle on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while repeating a
> > misleading claim against Obama used by Hillary Clinton and McCain on
> > an energy bill. She also exaggerated her own accomplishment regarding
> > a $40 billion proposed pipeline in Alaska.
> >
> > Sen. Biden, however, was in a place by himself when it came to bogus
> > claims, absurd contentions, and flights of rhetorical fancy. He threw
> > out several assertions that were so preposterous that – had Palin made
> > them – they would have prompted immediate calls for McCain to dump her
> > from the ticket.
> > The good senator from Delaware warmed up slowly, erroneously claiming
> > that McCain voted with Obama on a budget resolution, and asserting
> > wrongly that Obama wanted to return to the Reagan-era marginal income
> > tax rates. He also embarked on an appallingly wrongheaded monologue
> > about the constitutional history of the vice presidency. But when the
> > talk turned to national security, presumably Biden's purported area of
> > expertise, he went completely off the grid.
> >
> > • "John McCain voted against a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty that
> > every Republican has supported," Biden stated. (Actually, in a 1999
> > vote in Congress, McCain sided with 50 other Republicans to kill the
> > treaty. Only four joined the Democrats.) • "Pakistan already has
> > deployed nuclear weapons," Biden said. "Pakistan's weapons can already
> > hit Israel and the Mediterranean." (Pakistan has no known
> > intercontinental missiles. The range of its weapons is thought to be
> > 1,000 miles – halfway to Israel.)
> >
> > • "When we kicked--along with France--we kicked Hezbollah out of
> > Lebanon, I said and Barack said, 'Move NATO forces in there. Fill the
> > vacuum, because if you don't...Hezbollah will control it.'" Biden
> > recalled. "Now what's happened? Hezbollah is a legitimate part of the
> > government in the country immediately to the north of Israel." (Except
> > that the U.S. never kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon or anywhere else.
> > They've been entrenched in Lebanon since 1982. Actually, Hezbollah,
> > insofar as it was responsible for the 1983 suicide bombing at the
> > Marine barracks that killed 241 U.S. servicemen, kicked America out of
> > Lebanon, not the other way around.)
> >
> > • "The president...insisted on elections on the West Bank, when I
> > said, and others said, and Barack Obama said, 'Big mistake. Hamas will
> > win. You'll legitimize them.' What happened? Hamas won," Biden said.
> > (Only the last two words of Biden's strange soliloquy are true. The
> > rest are false. For one thing, Fatah controls the West Bank. Biden was
> > thinking of Gaza. Secondly, neither Biden nor Obama predicted the 2006
> > victory for Hamas in Gaza's legislative elections. Third, McCain and
> > Obama – but not Biden -- signed a letter urging the president to
> > pressure Palestinians to require that candidates adhere to democratic
> > principles before being allowed to run for office. Fourth, Biden
> > served as an election observer and later wrote an article expressing
> > high praise for Bush's actions. To sum up: One factual error and three
> > fibs in only 31 words. Pretty impressive, in its way.)
> >
> > • "With Afghanistan, facts matter...we spend more money in three weeks
> > on combat in Iraq than we spend on the entirety of the last seven
> > years that we have been in Afghanistan. Let me say that again..." (He
> > did say it again, but that didn't make it true. It's wildly and
> > weirdly off the mark. Yes, facts matter. The facts here were that at
> > the time Biden was speaking, the U.S. had spent $172 billion in
> > Afghanistan. The Iraq War consumes between $7 billion and $8 billion
> > every three weeks. Biden's math was off by 2,000 percent.)
> >
> > • "Can I clarify this? This is simply not true about Barack Obama. He
> > did not say (he'd) sit down with Ahmadinejad." (He most certainly did.
> > And among those who criticized him at the time for it was Joe Biden,
> > who told Byron York of National Review that the idea of a president
> > meeting with the likes of the Iranian president or Hugo Chavez was
> > "naïve.")
> >
> > Those were alarming mistakes. To me Biden's most discordant claims
> > concerned his Animal House-like history lecture about the office of
> > the vice president. It came while Biden was dressing down Dick Cheney,
> > who was not present, for supposedly being unfamiliar with the
> > Constitution. "The idea (that) he doesn't realize that Article I of
> > the Constitution defines the role of the vice president of the United
> > States – that's the executive branch – he works in the executive
> > branch," Biden said. "He should understand that. Everyone should
> > understand that. And the primary role of the vice president of the
> > United States is to support the president of the United States of
> > America, give that president his or her best judgment when sought,
> > and, as vice president, to preside over the Senate, only in a time
> > when in fact there's a tie vote. The Constitution is explicit....He
> > has no authority relative to the Congress. The idea he's part of the
> > legislative branch is a bizarre notion invented by Cheney to
> > aggrandize the power of a unitary executive, and look where it has
> > gotten us."
> >
> > Lord, would Tina Fey have had fun with this jumble of misinformation –
> > if only Palin had said it! Article I defines the legislative, not
> > executive, branch. The vice president is, indeed, mentioned there.
> > What Biden finds "explicit," hasn't been so to previous vice
> > presidents or to most constitutional scholars. Prior to the 20th
> > century, vice presidents didn't even have offices at the White House
> > compound – they were housed in the Capitol. The notion that a veep's
> > constitutional authority is to provide advice to a president springs
> > from Biden's brow; it certainly isn't mentioned, or even contemplated,
> > in the Constitution, which doesn't even say whether the vice president
> > should receive a salary.
> > Should Joe Biden have known this stuff? Since he chaired the Senate
> > Judiciary Committee, you'd hope so. But even if he didn't, you'd think
> > it would be news when he unleashed a veritable fount of misinformation
> > to impugn Palin's knowledge of the federal system while attacking a
> > sitting vice president. It barely rated a mention in the collective
> > mainstream media.
> >
> > http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/07/08/sarah-barracuda-palin-and-the...
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to