VT I don't agree with Dick very often. I've noticed it's tended to be
mostly on military / intelligence issues ( I now understand why).
Let me ask you something and I'd like you to think about it. Do you
really think the there has ever been a four year period in this
country's history, in which no one was ever killed for national
security purposes, without open sanction?

On Jul 15, 7:47 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote:
> So you want to have our own hit squads killing
> non combatants in other countries.
>
> So much for the rule of law and the covenant against murder.
>
> You do realize that if a hit squad were to kill the wrong
> person or kill innocent people through collateral damage
> this could be viewed as an act of war?
>
> Kind of like we viewed it on 9/11.
>
> On Jul 15, 10:35 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I don't find it funny. What exactly do you think 9-11 was if not a hit
> > squad along with the previous attempt, the African embassies, the
> > residence in Saudi Arabia, the USS Cole? Or Iran's hostage taking? Or
> > Lebanon/Hezbollah bombing of the Marine barracks? Or the Intifada
> > supported by Saddam and Saudi Arabia? Etc. When are you going to start
> > viewing this as more serious than MSM? Or dimwit Congress? Or shopping
> > Americans? WE ARE AT WAR!
>
> > On Jul 15, 8:57 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > LOL Zeb you're funny. You obviously know squat about the US
> > > intelligence services though.
>
> > > On Jul 15, 5:42 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > They didn't "hide killing al Queda leaders." The proposal was NEVER
> > > > INITIATED. The Pentagon, the CIA, the NSA, the FBI consider many
> > > > possible scenarios. They don't go to Congress and say "Hey, one of our
> > > > guys thought of pouring tons of laundry detergent into the Red Sea"
> > > > every time someone proposes something. They do tell Congress when they
> > > > decide to move forward with a plan. Get it?
>
> > > > On Jul 15, 8:32 pm, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Are you sure? Because I find no reason to
> > > > > hide the killing of Al qaeda leaders from the
> > > > > Congressional over sight Committee Chairman.
>
> > > > > Bush said this was the objective PUBLICLY in speeches.
>
> > > > > On Jul 15, 8:25 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > The plan was to kill the al Queda leaders, not their supporters.
>
> > > > > > On Jul 15, 8:21 pm, VT Sean Lewis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Yesterday I asked myself a question, what would make an Al qaeda
> > > > > > > hit team illegal?
>
> > > > > > > A hit team that killed prominent foreigners in foreign
> > > > > > > countries who supported or helped finance Al qaeda?
>
> > > > > > > Just a thought.....- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to