Thanks for posting this Travis. As i've said a hundred times, I can't
stand Pelosi.

On Jul 17, 6:59 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> * *
>
> *http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=32718*
>
> * *
>
> * *
>
> *Pelosi Censors Republicans ***
>
> *by  Rep. John Carter *
>
> *07/16/2009 *
>
> * *
>
> *Monday night Democrats voted to shut down the U.S. House Representatives
> rather than allow a handful of Republican Congressmen to speak on the floor.
> What could have been so offensive or frightening about our discourse that
> Speaker Pelosi felt she had to protect her party by gagging free speech in
> the House?
>
> In fact, we had planned to speak on the lack of transparency of the House
> since Democrats took control. We had planned to criticize Speaker Pelosi for
> repeatedly denying Members, the media, and the public to right to read
> legislation before it was voted on. We were set to discuss House Majority
> Leader Steny Hoyer’s statement last week that if his Members were required
> to read the Democrats’ healthcare reform package before it was voted on, it
> would fail.
>
> So the Speaker obviously feels that if the public is truly aware of her
> party’s agenda, they will reject it. She is now making sure the public is
> kept in the dark by trampling the centuries-old democratic traditions of the
> House.
>
> What are those traditions? Every day that the House is in session, following
> the final vote of the day, representatives are allowed the privilege of free
> speech on the House floor in what is known as “Special Orders.” They may
> speak for one minute, five minutes, or one hour segments, and must request
> their time in advance. Time is allocated equally to both parties on a
> first-come basis.
>
> Since the advent of live C-SPAN coverage of the House, this has provided a
> national televised outlet for both Republicans and Democrats to speak to the
> nation on topics they feel were not adequately addressed during regular
> order in the House, during which the Democrat majority has the parliamentary
> ability to limit debate and speeches.
>
> Special Orders therefore frequently serves as a political safety valve if
> the party in the majority becomes too dictatorial during debate, using their
> majority status to truly oppress the minority’s ability to debate and offer
> amendments.
>
> That is now the case in the House, with the Democrat majority under Pelosi
> repeatedly rejecting House rules to ram a far-left agenda through before the
> public has time to learn what is actually in the bills.
>
> This is what we were committed to bring to public light.
>
> House rules require a bill be publicly posted for three days before it can
> be voted on. That basic rule was written by none other than Thomas Jefferson
> as part of the original rules package of the House, as it is essential to
> the survival of representative democracy.
>
> The House can waive that rule if it chooses on specific occasions. The
> Republican-controlled House chose to waive it when considering the Patriot
> Act in 2001 following the terror attacks of 9-11. They thought there was
> enough of a national defense emergency to just bring the bill to the floor
> for a vote.
>
> But Nancy Pelosi and her House Democrats have chosen to ignore the rule on
> every major issue taken up by the House this year, including:
>
> The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - The Obama Stimulus: This one
> just had to pass that very day because time was a-wastin’ in getting those
> new jobs coming. We couldn’t wait for Members to read it. But then the
> President waited four days to sign it into law while he spent the weekend in
> Chicago, and months later none of the new jobs have come into existence.
>
> The Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization (SCHIP): Speaker
> Pelosi couldn’t wait on this one either, although the deadline for
> reauthorization was still two months away.
>
> The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act: Lilly was peddled as covering decades-old
> wage discrimination cases, but after waiting 20 years, Congress couldn’t
> wait one more day to let Members actually read the thing.
>
> The Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009: No excuses at all on this
> one. They just didn’t want the details known.
>
> The Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009: This one has been languishing since
> last October, but we suddenly had to pass it that day.
>
> The AIG Bonus Tax Act: This had to get through right then, don’t mind the
> details, we just had to go after those bonuses. Only when we read what
> passed after the fact, the bill contained waivers for all of the same
> executives the bill was supposed to reign in, many with curiously close ties
> to Treasury Secretary and tax cheat Tim Geithner.
>
> The Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2009: No rush whatever on this one
> time-wise, the Democrats just didn’t want people talking about the hundreds
> of billions given to foreign banks that should have gone to our troops.
>
> The American Clean Energy and Security Act/National Cap-and-Trade Energy
> Tax:
> No excuse was offered on this one, the Speaker just didn’t want anybody
> reading Henry Waxman’s 300 page amendment he sneaked in overnight before we
> were forced to vote. Three weeks later, the Senate shows no intention of
> taking up the bill before the opening day of dove season, if then.
>
> There’s a reason all these bills are listed. The list constitutes every
> major policy bill undertaken by Congress this year. House Democrats are not
> just waiving the three-day rule -- they have destroyed it, and are
> intentionally pushing their agenda to the floor with blindfolds on the media
> and the public.
>
> This constitutes an astonishing and chilling acceleration of the assault on
> representative democracy that began in earnest this January.
>
> Representative democracy works when a U.S. Representative listens to the
> input of their constituents, and votes the way the majority of their
> district would vote. Only a Representative can’t listen if no one has ever
> seen the bill, or had time to provide input. They have to vote blind, which
> for too many, is voting the way their leadership tells them.
>
> This is what Republican House Members were going to the floor to say Monday
> night. We were set to decry the loss of openness in the House.
>
> Instead, we were met with a slammed door by Democrats, who are now committed
> to burying truth along with democracy.
>
> The Democrats are the majority -- for now. They chose to silence debate on
> the floor by gagging House Republican Members from using their historical
> right to speak after the close of the day. But they cannot stop us from
> speaking outside the halls of Congress and letting the American public know
> the truth about their ongoing attack against the very foundations of a free
> Republic.*
>
> * *
> *
> ------------------------------
> *
>
> *Mr. Carter, a Republican, represents the 31st District of Texas in the U.S.
> House of Representatives.** *
> *
> ------------------------------
> *
>
> __,_._,___
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to