*Worth Studying:  *(Even if he does get the colors reversed.)  Joel 
Kotkin on the blue states "meltdown" 
<http://www.american.com/archive/2009/july/the-blue-state-meltdown-and-the-collapse-of-the-chicago-model>.
 


    On the surface this should be the moment the Blue Man basks in
    glory.  The most urbane president since John Kennedy sits in the
    White House.  A San Francisco liberal runs the House of
    Representatives while the key committees are controlled by
    representatives of Boston, Manhattan, Beverly Hills, and the Bay
    Area---bastions of the gentry.

    Despite his famous
    no-blue-states-no-red-states-just-the-United-States statement, more
    than 90 percent of the top 300 administration officials come from
    states carried last year by President Obama.   The inner
    cabinet---the key officials---hail almost entirely from a handful of
    cities, starting with Chicago but also including New York, Los
    Angeles, and the San Francisco area.

    This administration shares all the basic prejudices of the Blue Man
    including his instinctive distaste for "sprawl," cars, and
    factories.  In contrast, policy is tilting to favor all the basic
    blue-state economic food groups---public employees, university
    researchers, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, Wall Street, and the major
    urban land interests.

    Yet despite all this, the blue states appear to be continuing their
    decades-long meltdown. 

Because, as Kotkin explains, they have been following the policies that 
the Obama administration is trying to impose on the entire country.

One of the worst examples comes from California:

    Perhaps the most searing disaster is unfolding in the rich Central
    Valley.  Large areas are about to be returned to desert---due less
    to a mild drought than to regulations designed to save obscure fish
    species in the state's delta.  Over 450,000 acres have been allowed
    to go fallow.  Nearly 30,000 agriculture jobs---mostly held by
    Latinos---were lost just in May.  Unemployment, 17 percent across
    the Central Valley, reaches to more than 40 percent in some towns
    such as Mendota.

    "We are getting the sense some people want us to die," notes native
    son Tim Stearns, a professor of entrepreneurship at California State
    University at Fresno.  "It's kind of like they like the status quo
    and what happens in the Central Valley doesn't matter.  These are
    just a bunch of crummy towns to them." 

(Crummy towns in areas that raise a very large proportion of America's 
food --- but that doesn't seem to matter to those who run California.)

Though the mistakes made by Michigan's Governor Granholm may provide an 
even clearer example of what won't work, economically.

Kotkin thinks there is hope, even for some of our most Democratic 
states, because voters in them, especially taxpayers, are beginning to 
catch on.  I agree, and expect to see Republican gains, starting, most 
likely, in New Jersey, where the Republican candidate, Chris Christie, 
now has a double digit lead in most polls 
<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2009/governor/nj/new_jersey_governor_corzine_vs_christie-1051.html>
 
over incumbent Democrat Jon Corzine.

By way of the Instapundit <http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/82342/>, 
who has a video interview of Kotkin.
- 12:49 PM, 22 July 2009   [link] 
<http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/July2009_3.html#jrm7648>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to