July 22, 2009
Are Men Obsolete?

*By* *Robin of Berkeley* <http://www.americanthinker.com/robin_of_berkeley/>

When I snapped out of my left wing
trance<http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/letter_of_amends_from_a_recove.html>last
year, I was lost in space.  I had no conservative friends and was
clueless about web sites and books.

I had heard something vaguely about Talk Radio.  So I scanned my AM dial and
found Michael Savage.  (It took several months, and a chat with a rather
bemused new friend, before I even realized there were other hosts as well.)



Being a lifelong liberal, I'd never heard anybody like Savage in my life.
He yelled;  he called people "vermin."  He was unbridled masculinity, not
the touchy feeling kind I was used to.  And he totally accepted himself:
his moods, passion, temper.



But what shocked me the most was his saying that men have become
"feminized."  I'd never been so offended.  "Well, what's wrong with men
being more feminine?"  I shouted back at my radio.  "Is there something
wrong with femininity?"   Men being way more in touch with their yin and
less with their yang sounded good to me.



I hadn't exactly been a big fan of masculinity.  Like any good feminist,
ranting and raving about men were two of my favorite pastimes.   Men
frightened me.  Testosterone fueled types like Michael Savage scared the
bejeezus out of me.  I had good reasons, of course, given episodes of
harassment and abuse.



I couldn't tune Savage out because he was the only game in town (or so I
thought).   Also, he was spot on about Obama, and his show was a rich
tapestry of politics, philosophy, history, and religion.  So I stayed glued.




What a difference a year makes.  Now I see Savage as a seer warning us of
the dangers we were in for if men went the way of the dinosaur.   I had
thought taming men's animal nature was a win-win for everybody.  Now I
realize it was tampering with Mother Nature.



And I have to wonder whether the feminization of men has been an unforeseen
result of liberalism or some twisted scheme hatched by the left.  In some
ways, it feels paranoid to even go there, like I've watched too many sci fi
flicks.  But at the same time if Professor Bill Ayers and his ilk could plot
infiltrating the schools with all things Marxist, why stop there?  Why not
engineer a designer man who would go along with the liberal flow?



Step one:  loosen men up through psychotherapy where they can get in touch
with their inner child.   Have them exchange their arms for drums that they
can pound in the woods with groups of brothers.  Teach them to reject logic
and lead with their emotions.



Idolize gayness, because after all, aren't gay men just XY versions of the
superior women?  Degrade anything masculine.   Marginalize and vilify the
macho types like Savage, by banning him from the U.K.



Hike up the costs of SUV's and trucks, and squeeze men into deracinated cars
like the Prius (notice how prissy even the name sounds?) Even better, herd
them to work in buses and trains to save the planet (and control them).



Ask the question, as Maureen Dowd did in her bestselling book, "Are Men
Necessary?"  Answer in the negative by glorifying single mothers and
supporting sperm donors.  Why bother with a bossy husband when the
government can put moms on the dole?  And anyway, with gayness being the
next big craze, there may be fewer straight men out there.



On the horizon:  making the notion of gender arbitrary anyway.  Allow people
free and easy access to sex change operations (I'll bet good money they will
be readily available under ObamaCare.)



*Allow children to choose their own sex.  (By the way, the fad is already in
vogue and called "gender neutrality."   Parents don't inform their child of
his or her or its gender and let the little mutant choose one.)*

* *

*Even better, have your child be Bob one day and Becky the next, another hot
trend called "gender fluid."  It's already happening at a few San Francisco
Bay Area schools, where bathrooms are unisex and children get to alter their
gender as the mood strikes them.*



*The piece de resistance of feminization:  wreck the economy.  If you want
to cripple men, rob them of their life spring: their ability to provide for
their family.  No worries:  the government will step in as a worthy
substitute.  *

* *

*And the final stroke of genius:  disempower the true symbols of
masculinity:  the military, police, and intelligence officers.  Investigate
them, sue them, protest them with riots in the street.  Make them feel
intimidated about doing their jobs.   Require them to attend plenty of
sensitivity workshops.  *



So, after decades of my going along like an automaton with the liberal
program, I finally got it.   As people like Savage have warned us about for
years, tampering with gender is a disaster.  And not just for men.



Because society shrinks when we are forced to give up who we are, and we
become shells of ourselves when we're robbed of our birthright:  dignity,
freedom, individuality.  We become cloned people, with this part and that
part, never discovering who we are.



We become what the Tibetans call "hungry ghosts:"  tormented beings looking
all over for happiness but never finding it because we've forgotten the only
place it lives -- in our spirit, which is connected to forces Beyond.   We
lose forever the knowledge of our true nature that we first glimpsed when we
were knee high.



Because the fact is that humans cannot, should not, fool with Mo Nature,
shouldn't take nature in our hands and play God.  To do so can unleash
madness and danger as we know from every horror movie.



Because while we've been engineering a kinder, gentler man, much of the
world has been doing the opposite.  Countries like Iran and North Korea have
been building nuclear weapons and poisoning their young men with hatred of
the U.S.  They have been making their men stronger, meaner, and better
armed.



Liberals:  be honest with yourselves.  In the end, if the worst case
scenario happens (God forbid) and we are attacked, who will you run to?
Will you scream out for the Green Czar?



No;  all of us, liberals and leftists, conservatives and feminists, we will
go where we have always gone from the beginning of time;  we will search
desperately for the big, strong men to protect us, the ones who have always
had the guts, the courage, and yes the *cojones*, to put their lives and
limbs on the line.

The question is:  by then, how many will be left?



*A frequent AT contributor, Robin is a recovering liberal and
psychotherapist in Berkeley.*


*Page Printed from:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/are_men_obsolete.html*

__,_._,___

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to