Zeb,

So then, you are obviously in favor of more restrictive contols over
corporations by government? This is the SAME industry that has control
over our health industry NOW!

On Jul 24, 1:46 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
> The same rules apply in NJ. GOVERNMENT allows this. The same
> government that some people want to turn our medical system over to.
> It boggles my mind that people willingly go over this cliff.
>
> On Jul 24, 2:41 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Little incident happened today that makes me furious and I'll be
> > damned if I can think of any excuse/justification other than plain old
> > fashioned greed on the part of insurance companies.
> > My oldest son is just now recovering from an extended period of
> > unemployment bad enough that he had to return a new Jag that he could
> > no longer afford. I loaned him an old 4-wheel drive I kept for fishing
> > trips. I, of course ,had it licensed and insured in my own name.
> > He recently started a decent job and was going to buy a used Malibu I
> > loaned him the money to buy. He called the insurance agent he'd had
> > for years to check on the insurance rate for it and was told he would
> > have to file what is called an SR-22 and would have to pay high risk
> > rates, the same as if he'd had multiple chargeable accidents, moving
> > violations and/or even a DUI! Why, he quite reasonably asked. He was
> > told it was because he had not had auto insurance for more than 6
> > consecutive months. That's it!
> > He had been driving with the same driver's license, had received no
> > tickets, no accidents, no nothing. So far as his actions as a safe
> > driver were concerned nothing whatsoever had changed. Why would
> > someone who did not own a car have auto insurance?
> > Conveniently, for the insurance companies, it is state law in Missouri
> > than one MUST have auto insurance. You can't even get your car
> > licensed w/o showing proof of insurance and getting caught driving w/o
> > adequate insurance is a minimum of a $500.00 fine and the threat of
> > having your driver's license suspended.
>
> > Looks to me like a simple case of the insurance industry saying "well,
> > we are fucking you just because we can and there's not a damned thing
> > you can do about it". How many people in today's economy are getting
> > royally screwed like this I have to wonder?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to