http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/the_end_game_of_the_left.html

August 01, 2009

*The End Game of the Left*

*By* *Andrew Thomas* <http://www.americanthinker.com/andrew_thomas/>

Within the world of the far left, individuals have no value.  Only the state
matters.  That is why the modern American statist devalues individual
achievement and wealth.  If, as in the socialist world of Marx, Engels, and
Adolf Hitler (yes, Hitler, as I will explain later), God does not exist and
humans have no souls, then the state determines the value of a human life.
This philosophy leads to an ominous conclusion.

In my never-ending quest to understand the statist mind, I have attempted to
use the principles of objective observation, or
phenomenology<http://www.answers.com/topic/phenomenology>,
to analyze their intentions based on their behavior.  Statists, it appears,
have two proclivities:  One, they are perpetually unhappy and dissatisfied
with the current political and social environment, no matter what it happens
to be.  Two, they are viscerally angry at whoever stands in their way to the
next level of progressive utopia.  They do not tolerate alternate points of
view.  An objective individual might classify this behavior as classic
immaturity.  But there is much more darkness to the statist soul than mere
boorish behavior.



The seemingly endless downward spiral into Dante's seventh level of
socialist utopia was made into a movie back in 1968, aptly titled "Wild in
the Streets <http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/wild_in_the_streets/>".  It was
a pretty cheesy flick, but one particular scene left a lasting impression on
me.  This was where the radical leftist youths who took control of the
government sent the old folks off to national concentration camps and forced
them to drink from water coolers filled with Kool-Aid laced with LSD.  For
some reason, this image keeps popping into my head whenever I hear about
ObamaCare.  At the end of the movie, there is a foreshadowing that an even
younger and more radical regime is about to overthrow the radical leftists
in power.  On and on it goes, with Dante's infernal utopia never quite
achieved.



Concessions to the fantastic demands of statists lead to more
dissatisfaction and anger, and increasingly fantastic demands.  This is
similar to the strategy of the radical
Islamists<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAQ3yDaSoS4>living in Western
countries.  In fact, you can phenomenologically observe
many attitude similarities between the statist and Islamist.  Intolerance of
divergent opinions, hatred toward "non-believers", the obsession to dominate
and control every aspect of others' lives, and a dogmatic attitude guided by
emotion rather than logic, are some examples.  Of course, Islamists are just
statists with a state religion.  To the Islamist, the end game for the
Infidel is conversion or death.



The statist philosophy, whether Islamic or otherwise, appears to condone and
even embrace the concept of eliminating the members of the opposition by
murdering them.  While the left projects hatred, racism, and evil on the
conservative end of the spectrum, it is they who actually exhibit these
attributes.  As New York University professor George Watson states in his
book <http://www.lutterworth.com/lp/titles/lostlitp.htm>, "The Lost
Literature of Socialism":



But it was the issue of race, above all, that for half a century has
prevented National Socialism (the Nazi party) from being seen as socialist.
The assumption that socialism was never racist can now be seen as a
misunderstanding.



The proletariat may have no fatherland, as Lenin said.  But there were
still, in Marx view, races that would have to be exterminated.  That is a
view he published in January-February 1849 in an article by Engels called
"The Hungarian Struggle" in Marx journal the *Neue Rheinische Zeitung*, and
the point was recalled by socialists down to the rise of Hitler.  It is now
becoming possible to believe that Auschwitz was socialist-inspired.  The
Marxist theory of history required and demanded genocide for reasons
implicit in its claim that feudalism, which in advanced nations was already
giving place to capitalism, must in turn be superseded by socialism.  Entire
races would be left behind after a workers' revolution, feudal remnants in a
socialist age; and since they could not advance two steps at a time, they
would have to be killed.  They were racial trash, as Engels called them, and
fit only for the dung-heap of history.



Watson continues:



Socialism offered a blank check to violence, and its license to kill
included genocide.  In 1933, in a preface to On the Rocks, for example,
Bernard Shaw publicly welcomed the exterminatory which, to his profound
satisfaction, the Soviet Union had already adopted.  Socialists could now
take pride in a state that had at last found the courage to act, though some
still felt that such action should be kept a secret.  In 1932 Beatrice Webb
remarked at a tea-party what "very bad stage management" it had been to
allow a party of British visitors in the Ukraine to see cattle-trucks full
of starving "enemies of the state" at a local station.



But after all, nothing like this could happen in America, right?  Obama's
building up of ACORN community organizers and the AmeriCorps civilian army
with billions of dollars from the Stimulus couldn't be used against its own
citizens, could it?  His statement that "We've got to have a civilian
national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as
well-funded (as the military)" doesn't
scare<http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/obama_fear_and_the_security_fo.html>you,
does it?  Read the following transcript from the testimony of Larry
Grathwohl <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_5MY59ENrc&NR=1>, an FBI
informant <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXDVLSDvL5w> who infiltrated a
1970 meeting conducted by Obama's close friend (and probable
ghost-writer<http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/breakthrough_on_the_authorship_1.html>)
William Ayers and included the leadership of the socialist Weather
Underground.



I brought up the subject of what's going to happen after we take over the
government. You know, we become responsible for administrating, you know,
250 million people. And there was no answer. No one had given any thought to
economics. How are you going to clothe and feed these people? The only thing
that I could get was that they expected that the Cubans, the North
Vietnamese, the Chinese and the Russians would all want to occupy different
portions of the United States. They also believed that their immediate
responsibility would be to protect against what they called the
counter-revolution. And they felt that this counter-revolution could best be
guarded against by creating and establishing re-education in the Southwest
where we would take all of the people who needed to be re��'educated into
the new way of thinking and teach them how things were going to be. I asked,
"Well, what is going to happen to those people that we can't re��'educate,
that are die-hard capitalists?" And the reply was that they'd have to be
eliminated and when I pursued this further, they estimated that they'd have
to eliminate 25 million people in these re��'education centers. *And when I
say eliminate, I mean kill 25 million people. I want you to imagine sitting
in a room with 25 people, most of whom have graduate degrees from Columbia
and other well-known educational centers and hear them figuring out the
logistics for the elimination of 25 million people and they were dead
serious**.*



The end game of the left is the abortion and eugenic elimination of the
"undesirables", the euthanasia of the old and infirm, and the genocide of
those who disagree.  Its objective is the purity of socialist thought.  And
it is pure evil.



*Andrew Thomas blogs at
Darkangelpolitics<http://darkangelpolitics.blogspot.com/>
*


*Page Printed from:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/the_end_game_of_the_left.html* at
August 01, 2009 - 10:00:29 AM EDT

__,_._,___

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to