obama makes Carter look great.

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I absolutely dread the thought that Obama turns out to be like Carter
> as President or Dinkins as mayor of NYC. Maybe far worse.
>
> On Aug 7, 1:39 pm, RICHARD BROWN <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The establishment media gave us Carter and now Obama by catering to
> > the herd mentality...the same mentality that has obsessed with the
> > death of Jackson to no end.
> >
> > On Aug 7, 7:02 am, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > The Transitive Property of Marginalization, and the Unconscious Statism
> of
> > > Pundits Who Like Presidents
> >
> > > Matt Welch <http://reason.com/staff/hitandrun/134.html> | July 22,
> 2009,
> > > 12:20pm
> > > *Salon* Editor in Chief Joan Walsh, while getting President Obama's
> back on
> > > the health care
> > > debate<
> http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2009/07/21/obama_health_c...>,
> > > tries to make a tremendously significant and complicated policy
> overhaul
> > > mostly about the political party not in power:
> >
> > > I know Obama has a nearly impossible task, dealing with Blue Dog
> Democrats
> > > and crazy Republicans -- from Wild Bill Kristol, chickenhawk, telling
> the
> > > GOP to "go for the kill" and do whatever it takes to defeat Obama on
> > > healthcare, to Sen. Jim DeMint's similarly sinister prediction that if
> > > Republicans defeat Obama on healthcare "it will break him." GOP zealots
> are
> > > clearly more interested in killing or breaking President Obama --
> > > politically, of course; I don't think they are assassins, personally --
> than
> > > helping Americans get the healthcare they need. It's a little creepy,
> but
> > > once you've watched a crazy "birther" hector moderate Republican Mike
> Castle
> > > about Obama's birth certificate and other related delusions -- well,
> then
> > > nothing Republicans do can surprise you.
> >
> > > Though Walsh would surely bristle at the label, I think she's
> demonstrating
> > > here (even in half-jest) what Jesse Walker memorably coined as "the
> paranoia
> > > of the centrists <http://www.reason.com/news/show/134156.html>." By
> > > portraying Republicans as "crazy," "nearly impossible" to deal with,
> > > "interested in killing or breaking Obama," and obsessed with "Obama's
> birth
> > > certificate and other related delusions," she is attempting to
> marginalize
> > > the minority national party away from the Adult's Table, in much the
> same
> > > way that pro-war Republicans at the height of George W. Bush's
> popularity
> > > aimed to tar anti-war Democrats as being "on the other side." Put
> another
> > > way, what does a (mostly) fringeobsession with Obama's birth
> > > certificate<http://reason.com/blog/show/134874.html> have
> > > to do with Obama's health care plan? Precisely nothing.
> >
> > > [image: This is a visual depiction of The Burden of Proof]Democrats and
> > > their supporters, like any temporary majoritarian with hands on the
> wheel of
> > > state, need to remember an important point: The burden of
> > > proof<http://www.reason.com/blog/show/131509.html> is
> > > not on the minority party (or other citizens) who say "no" or even
> "hold on
> > > a sec." The burden of proof is on the politician who wants to make a
> major
> > > change in public policy and the use of taxpayer dollars. (And for the
> > > record, I say this as someone who finds much of our current health care
> > > system to be disgraceful.) It wouldn't matter a bit what Bill Kristol
> > > thought (or whether he, uh, served in the military?) if the Obama
> > > administration had crafted a health care plan that passed the smell
> test for
> > > 60 percent of the population, or even all of his own party's senators.
> I
> > > know it's irritating and all, but you really do have to convince the
> rest of
> > > us sometimes, instead of just pressing the "Do Something" button.
> >
> > > Having opened fire on the minority, Walsh then turns her scope onto the
> > > media:
> >
> > > According to the Hollywood Reporter, Obama had to move his Wednesday
> press
> > > conference, which is expected to zero in on the importance of serious
> health
> > > care reform, an hour earlier, because three of four national networks
> balked
> > > at preempting their top-rated shows. According to THR: "Fox declined to
> air
> > > the press conference outright. NBC and ABC fell into line late Monday
> after
> > > the White House shifted the event's time from the previously announced
> 9
> > > p.m. to the lesser-watched hour of 8 p.m." What shows were they worried
> > > about? "America's Got Talent," "So You Think You Can Dance," "Wipeout"
> and
> > > "I Survived a Japanese Game Show!"
> >
> > > Now, I love my reality TV, but that's a disturbing, indelible picture
> of how
> > > skewed our media priorities are.
> >
> > > How did *Salon* react when "media priorities" forced President Bush to
> > > reschedule <http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-132046046.html> his
> prime-time
> > > press conference<
> http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/04/2005...>
> > > about
> > > Social Security reform in 2005? Like
> > > this<http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2005/04/29/headline/>
> > > .
> >
> > > [Link via Ann Althouse<
> http://althouse.blogspot.com/2009/07/its-time-to-stand-up-with-presid...>
> > > ]
> >
> > > Opponents of Health Care Overhaul = Birthers, Vol. 3
> http://www.reason.com/blog/show/135291.html
> >
> > > The sender also included this note:
> >
> > > More lies from the media whores of the tax predator ruling class
> >
> > > --
> > > Sent via a FeedFlare link from a FeedBurner feed.
> http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/publishers/feedflare
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to