His main points are

1) insure all
2) save money through rationalization despite insuring all
3) it is broken and needs to be fixed now (while now trying to fix
Medicare first)...
4) Tort reform is a deal breaker and not really a driver of increasing
Health costs

Problem is how can you save money while covering more people without
some rationing???   And in fact, Obama has discussed this...   So
Obama's pitch is unconvincing...  And the NYT is just noticing after
trashing  opposition to Obama's plan...

I remember clearly how Democrats demanded that the reason for removing
Saddam only be limited to WMD and being an immediate threat BECAUSE
that was how it was "sold" (really as presented by the MSM)....   Is
it not right then to judge Health Care reform by how it is being
sold???  If so, it is clear to me Obama is lying because the basic
points contradict each other...

In fact, gleaning savings through "The zeal for cutting health costs,
combined with proposals to compare the effectiveness of various
treatments and to counsel seniors on end-of-life care" are a
reasonable concern concerning rationing...  All Palin did was to label
this concern in a unflattering light -"death panels"...   If Obama can
spin the facts one way, why is not legitimate for Palin to spin the
same facts the other...

And that leads to my last point here, Obama is complaining that folks
are not buying his spin without question...  And that suggests to some
he is just another used car salesman selling a clunker...

http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2009/08/new-fromthe-times-when-we-said-false-we-meant-kinda-true.html

{quoting from the NYT}

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/21/health/policy/21seniors.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

>>> Bills now in Congress would squeeze savings out of Medicare, a lifeline for 
>>> the elderly, on the assumption that doctors and hospitals can be more 
>>> efficient.

President Obama has sold health care legislation to Congress and the
country as a way to slow the growth of federal health spending, no
less than as a way to regulate the insurance market and cover the
uninsured.

Mr. Obama has also said Medicare and private insurers could improve
care and save money by following advice from a new federal panel of
medical experts on “what treatments work best.”

The zeal for cutting health costs, combined with proposals to compare
the effectiveness of various treatments and to counsel seniors on end-
of-life care, may explain why some people think the legislation is
about rationing, which could affect access to the most expensive
services in the final months of life.

“I don’t think we will get the quality of health care with this plan
that we get now,” said James T. Aronis, 79, of Wichita, Kan.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to