_______________________________

A Deck Stacked With Race Cards
by Jonah Goldberg

What if America transcended race, and Barack Obama wasn't invited?

The question comes to mind as cries of racism grow ever louder from Obama's
supporters.

No one should be surprised. Fish gotta swim, birds gotta fly, liberal
Democrats have to accuse their opponents of racism. Indeed, somewhat to
their credit, fighting racism -- alas, even where it doesn't exist -- is one
of the reasons they became liberal Democrats in the first place.

And that's the great irony of the Obama presidency. It was Obama's
supporters who hinted, teased, promised or prophesied that Obama would help
America "transcend race." But now, it is they who shrink from their own
promised land.

After all, it was not Obama's detractors who immediately fell into the
comfortable groove of racial grievance and familiar "narratives" when Henry
Louis Gates insisted that a police instructor in racial sensitivity had to
be a racist. That was Obama and his choir of heralds.

>From day one, Obama's supporters have tirelessly cultivated the idea that
anything inconvenient to the first black president just might be terribly,
terribly racist.

This was always the nasty side of Obama's implied hope for unity. Obama gave
oxygen to the idea that disagreement with him amounted to obstructing his
mission to "transcend race." During the campaign, that meant anyone who got
in his way was wittingly or unwittingly abetting racism (just ask Bill
Clinton). A writer for Slate magazine insisted journalists must not call
attention to the fact that Obama is "skinny." Such observations fuel racism
by highlighting his physical appearance, and that in turn might suddenly
alert racist American voters to the fact that Obama is ... wait for it ...
black.

Now that he's president, if you question his tax policies, energy plans or
health-care ambitions, you are "hoping he will fail" -- and that, with the
help of roundabout reasoning, is tantamount to hoping we cannot transcend
race.

Loading the deck in such a way is a gift of Obama's. Time and again, he
pre-empts dissent by claiming he's open-minded, pragmatic and
non-ideological, and therefore if you disagree with him, you must be some
sort of zealot.

His shock troops make the same argument about race, sometimes with
sophistication, sometimes with the kind of lucid clarity only profound
stupidity can provide. For instance, actress Janeane Garofalo summed up the
tea parties thusly: "This is about hating a black man in the White House.
This is racism straight up."

A more sophisticated version comes from Princeton professor Melissa
Harris-Lacewell, who finds racism in complaints that socialized medicine
would result in fewer Americans "taking responsibility" for their own health
care. "What we know over the past 25 years," she told NPR, "is that language
of personal responsibility is often a code language used against poor and
minority communities." In an ABC News story about how racist white militias
are somehow connected to town hall protests, Mark Potok of the dismayingly
left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center insists Obama has "triggered fears
among fairly large numbers of white people in this country that they are
somehow losing their country."

Two weeks ago, town hallers were supposed to be members of the Brooks
Brothers brigade, AstroTurf division. Now they're well-armed anti-government
militias. At this rate, they'll soon be android ninjas with laser vision.
Wait, strike that. They'll be really racist android ninjas with laser
vision.

Suddenly, if conservatives want to transcend race, we have to agree to
massive increases in the size of government and socialized medicine.

That's not transcending race, it's using Obama's race to bully the
opposition into acquiescence. Actually transcending race would require
treating Obama like any other president. Which is pretty much exactly what
conservatives have been doing. Seriously, if Hillary Clinton were president,
would conservatives really be rolling over for the same health-care plan
because she's white?

Sure, racists don't like Obama (in less shocking news, bears continue to use
our national forests as toilets). But that doesn't mean everyone who
dislikes Obama is therefore a racist.

What's dismaying is how the press and Democrats are so desperate to obscure
this point. The only notable political violence at a town hall was against a
black man, roughed up by pro-Obama toughs. The assault weapon carried to a
lawful demonstration was carried by a black man. That supposedly racist
poster depicting Obama as the Joker? (An LA Weekly writer fumed, "The only
thing missing is a noose.") That was created by a Palestinian-American
supporter of left-wing garden gnome Dennis Kucinich. Whoops!

Never mind. They'll keep trying until they find a scapegoat that works,
because that is what they do.

http://townhall.com/columnists/JonahGoldberg/2009/08/21/a_deck_stacked_with_race_cards?page=full




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RumblesAList/

<*> Your email settings:
   Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RumblesAList/join
   (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
   mailto:[email protected]
   mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
   http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to