is when George H Bush addressed students Democrats investigated
possible political manipulation...   If it is ok for Obama it should
have been ok for George H Bush...   The other possibility is Democrats
are hypocrites who use smears to question Republican motives while
demanding others assume only good motives for Democrats...   Was not
changing this type of hypocrisy what  Obama promised???

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/When-Bush-spoke-to-students-Democrats-investigated-held-hearings-57694347.html

>>> Unlike the Obama speech, in 1991 most of the controversy came after, not 
>>> before, the president's school appearance. The day after Bush spoke, the 
>>> Washington Post published a front-page story suggesting the speech was 
>>> carefully staged for the president's political benefit. "The White House 
>>> turned a Northwest Washington junior high classroom into a television 
>>> studio and its students into props," the Post reported.

With the Post article in hand, Democrats pounced. "The Department of
Education should not be producing paid political advertising for the
president, it should be helping us to produce smarter students," said
Richard Gephardt, then the House Majority Leader. "And the president
should be doing more about education than saying, 'Lights, camera,
action.'"

Democrats did not stop with words. Rep. William Ford, then chairman of
the House Education and Labor Committee, ordered the General
Accounting Office to investigate the cost and legality of Bush's
appearance. On October 17, 1991, Ford summoned then-Education
Secretary Lamar Alexander and other top Bush administration officials
to testify at a hearing devoted to the speech. "The hearing this
morning is to really examine the expenditure of $26,750 of the
Department of Education funds to produce and televise an appearance by
President Bush at Alice Deal Junior High School in Washington, DC,"
Ford began. "As the chairman of the committee charged with the
authorization and implementation of education programs, I am very much
interested in the justification, rationale for giving the White House
scarce education funds to produce a media event."

Unfortunately for Ford, the General Accounting Office concluded that
the Bush administration had not acted improperly. "The speech itself
and the use of the department's funds to support it, including the
cost of the production contract, appear to be legal," the GAO wrote in
a letter to Chairman Ford. "The speech also does not appear to have
violated the restrictions on the use of appropriations for publicity
and propaganda."

That didn't stop Democratic allies from taking their own shots at
Bush. The National Education Association denounced the speech, saying
it "cannot endorse a president who spends $26,000 of taxpayers' money
on a staged media event at Alice Deal Junior High School in
Washington, D.C. -- while cutting school lunch funds for our neediest
youngsters."

Lost in all the denouncing and investigating was the fact that Bush's
speech itself, like Obama's today, was entirely unremarkable. "Block
out the kids who think it's not cool to be smart," the president told
students. "If someone goofs off today, are they cool? Are they still
cool years from now, when they're stuck in a dead end job. Don't let
peer pressure stand between you and your dreams.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to