http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=C7B90228-18FE-70B2-A85833BB1C199
392


ACORN could open Pandora's box
By: Ken Blackwell and Ken Klukowski
September 18, 2009 05:04 AM EST

In the wake of Fox News reporting on the unfolding ACORN scandal,
ACORN is now threatening to sue the network. Now that Fox is actually
breaking news on this story by showing new videos, ACORN might just do
it. Fox News should pray that ACORN does sue, because it would blow
the doors off this story, possibly destroying ACORN and erupting into
a political scandal in Washington.

As bizarre as it seems, ACORN is threatening to sue Fox for reporting
on these incriminating videotapes. Glenn Beck broke news with a new
tape on Monday, and Sean Hannity might be doing the same shortly.
Evidently, ACORN is accusing Fox of coordinating with the filmmakers,
arguing that somehow these reports make Fox legally liable.

ACORN's unavoidable problem, however, is that suing Fox News would
give Fox - or any other media organization - the ultimate Christmas
present: a legally enforceable way to compel ACORN to give up all its
secrets.

The process by which a party to a lawsuit can force the opposing party
to disclose information is called discovery, which can take the form
of depositions, written questions, or demands for the production of
documents. Under federal rules, a defendant can get court orders for
discovery for any information relevant to its defense, except for
privileged information such as attorney-client discussions.

If ACORN sues, it would have to sue alleging some variation of
defamation or fraud. The problem is that for either allegation, truth
is an absolute defense. Nothing could be more relevant to Fox
establishing its defense of truth in the lawsuit than having access to
ACORN's office memos, emails, phone records, and bank statements. All
of these would have a reasonable chance of providing evidence as to
whether ACORN workers had knowledge of any of the topics seen on the
videotapes.

In short, it would blow the doors off ACORN's vault of secrets. Fox
would learn which organizations collaborate with ACORN, how they spend
taxpayer money and what ACORN's leaders say to each other behind
closed doors. It would be a treasure trove for a media organization.

It could also become a massive political scandal in Washington. Two of
the individuals on ACORN's eight-member advisory board include John
Podesta (the chairman of President Obama's transition team after the
election) and Andrew Stern, the president of SEIU who is intimately
involved with the White House on numerous issues, including the health
care plan. Some Democratic elected and appointed officials also have
close ties with ACORN.

While it's certainly possible that none of these public officials have
any knowledge of criminal activities by ACORN workers, it would be
embarrassing to have their names associated with the investigation.
Does ACORN really want to open Pandora's box by suing a media company
when these things would be at stake?

It's not surprising that ACORN is considering lawsuits out of
desperation, including suits against the intrepid reporters who filmed
these tapes, and against Big Government, the new political website by
online media guru Andrew Breitbart that first broke this story and has
been the leading source for continuing developments.

(Not that any of them should be overly concerned, either. They would
have no trouble collecting vast sums for a legal defense team and
would have a good chance at winning on the merits in any such lawsuit.
And again, their discovery efforts would give Big Government reams of
material for new stories. In short, they would become heroes to the
national conservative movement for helping bring down ACORN.)

So ACORN's legal actions would be its undoing. The resulting exposure
would explode into a national story that even sympathetic media
outlets could no longer ignore, bedeviling ACORN's allies at SEIU and
even dragging top advisers to President Barack Obama into humiliating
legal proceedings.

And once top ACORN officials were put on the witness stand under oath,
who knows what the American taxpayer would learn?

It would be one huge, ongoing scoop for Fox. And their ratings would
soar, as ACORN sinks beneath the waves.

---

Ken Blackwell is a former undersecretary at the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, and current senior fellow at the Family
Research Council and a visiting professor at Liberty University School
of Law. Ken Klukowski is a fellow and senior legal analyst with the
American Civil Rights Union and frequently contributes to FoxNews.com.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to