Bruce, How 3rd grade of you.
On Sep 30, 6:08 pm, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote: > Holly is an airhead > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The way you "question" the meaning of words is useless and merely > > evasive. Saying "it depends on how you define intimately" is as > > evasive as "it depends on how you define 'is'." > > > On Sep 29, 6:04 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Zeb, > > > > The wording DEFINES the issue. Two leaders can be taking the exact > > > same actions. One observer can describe the actions of one as > > > "obsessive micro-managing", another can describe the exact same > > > actions taken by the other man as "skillful over-sight or managing" or > > > some other term that carries a positive connotation. > > > > You've never read any Edward Bernays writings, total unaware of > > > marketing, labeling, branding, public relations or advertising? > > > Politicians refer to it a "spinning". > > > > Words are important. Your fucking right I'm going to questions words > > > and ther definitions. > > > > On Sep 29, 4:47 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > How long do you think you can avoid the issue at hand by questioning > > > > the definition of every other word? > > > > > On Sep 29, 4:18 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > > Guess that all depends on how you might wish to define "intimately, > > > > > now wouldn't it? > > > > > > On Sep 29, 10:28 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Its probably better for the President to be intimately involved > > with > > > > > > the war in Afghanistan than it is for him to dally with the > > Olympics > > > > > > or appearances on Leno and Letterman. > > > > > > > On Sep 28, 8:02 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > jgg, > > > > > > > > Good. A President is NOT micro-managing the on-site CO and > > letting him > > > > > > > do his job. This is how it should be. President Obama does not > > have a > > > > > > > military background, remember? > > > > > > > > On Sep 28, 5:06 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > in 70 days... So much for giving the commander a direct > > uncensored > > > > > > > > access to the President... Seems to me, a leader would want > > to > > > > > > > > direct communication with such a key commander in > > Afghanistan... > > >http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/back-story/2009/sep/28/us-comm... > > > > > > > > > >>> "I’ve talked to the president, since I’ve been here, once > > on a VTC [video teleconference]," Gen. Stanley McChrystal told CBS reporter > > David Martin in a television interview that aired Sunday. > > > > > > > > > "You’ve talked to him once in 70 days?" Mr. Martin followed up. > > > > > > > > > "That is correct," the general replied.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
