Jimmy, It is indeed up to every individual as POTUS is the only federally elected official that represents each and every US citizen.
On Oct 3, 10:19 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > d.b. > > Not up to you to decide the POTUS has even made a wrong move. Cool, > LET France do some work for a change, I'm tired of the U.S having to > do all the work. > > West Point will do what the fuck they are ORDERED to do, just like > always. > > On Oct 3, 11:03 pm, "d.b.baker" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Conflating Bush won't get Obama off the hook. > > > I can't say how many wrong moves Obama has left, but his support of > > the wanna-be, Honduran dictator Zelaya comes close. The tipping point, > > however, appears to be Iran - where I fully expect Ahmadinejad to > > clean Obama's Utopian clock. The UN fiasco was one thing, but when it > > takes "France" to put the foot down on Tehran - West Point knows we're > > in very serious trouble, that we've got a dangerous idiot in the Oval > > Office. > > > As for the possible violence, it's always part and parcel of > > fundamental change. Brace up. > > > On Oct 3, 11:16 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > d,b > > > > Seriously, that crack is some baaaad shit, give it up. > > > > Define "the world". Then tell me why OUR military would care enough > > > about what "the world" thinks of OUR President to violently remove OUR > > > President. "The world" was pretty much against Bush's invasion of > > > Iraq, didn't see our military trying a coup because they were so upset > > > over world opinion. > > > > Yes, I know you said nothing of violence. But believe me, if there is > > > an attempt to illegally remove the President from office there WILL be > > > violence, plenty of it. > > > > On Oct 3, 10:05 pm, "d.b.baker" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Well then, what's "your" take; why is the world now treating Obama > > > > like a urinal? > > > > > On Oct 3, 10:58 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > d.b. > > > > > > Riiiiiiight, there's going to be a military coup because Chicago > > > > > didn't get the Olympics. > > > > > Sure, makes perfect sense to me. Are you smoking crack tonight? > > > > > > On Oct 3, 8:42 pm, "d.b.baker" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > [Q] - There’s actually something worrisome about this whole Chicago > > > > > > fiasco, and it goes back to President Obama’s inexperience . . . > > > > > > President Obama just got upstaged by an organization against whom no > > > > > > retaliation is acceptable, and he wants to meet with the Iranians > > > > > > next > > > > > > month? We are in deep, deep trouble. > > > > > > --http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODcyYzVmZDEwMmYwMmQ2Mj... > > > > > > > Thus setting the stage for something I predicted a year ago; a > > > > > > military takeover. Simply because Obama is too dangerously inept to > > > > > > leave in the White House.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
