with that info the poll has not been established as "annual". with that as the proven case your post is more ludicrous than I thought (given of course that you are correct this time)
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:53 PM, ReallyAngryIndo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well mark considering the project was started in 08 and the last years > poll was realeased last year in November. Couldn't be too old, but > it's pointless to discuss anything with you further on the matter. > > On Oct 6, 4:34 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > exactly, "released every year". You still do not address hoe stale the > info > > (poll) is. I can take a poll every year and have 23 months between > pollings > > (January 2009 and December 2010 for example). The time the poll is taken > > (date) is one of the most relevant factors when quoting a "POLL". Yet > you > > don't seem to be able to grasp that very basic fact. > > > > Go bother some one else with your ignorance and vague wording and > articles. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:24 PM, ReallyAngryIndo <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > an annual poll taken when ??? you are still no help nor is your > > > article > > > > which quotes unfounded polls. > > > > > Did you follow the link? The NBI is an ANNUAL poll released every year > > > the company. What exactly do you mean "unfounded"? Please follow the > > > link and read the material before addressing it. thnx > > > > > On Oct 6, 2:21 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:48 AM, ReallyAngryIndo < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Well let's discount both polls. Mine for not having an official > > > > > "polling date" even though it is done annually every year and was > > > > > released from the company yesterday...And yours for being absurdly > > > > > misrepresentative in that it claims to represent the "opinions of > > > > > America" based off of 900 people and that it was conducted by a > source > > > > > so biased it isn't even in the realm of credible. > > > > > > > So what now, jack? > > > > > > > The fact is you are so ignorant and hateful you would WISH Obama > would > > > > > screw our country up and that national opinion about our country is > > > > > negative so you can be right. > > > > > > > Way to be a patriot. > > > > > > a whole lot of incorrect assumptions there Bubba. I am a patriot. > Just > > > not > > > > of Gringolandia. I don't wish Obama fucks up the US... he is simply > doing > > > > it. an annual poll taken when ??? you are still no help nor is your > > > article > > > > which quotes unfounded polls. > > > > > > and last most polls are just random samples and not tens or hundreds > of > > > > thousands of people are polled... just a few representative souls who > > > have > > > > been properly screened. thus the ever present (on a REAL poll "+ or - > x%" > > > > figures. > > > > > > > On Oct 6, 12:24 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Sorry you do not see the need for a polling date. > > > > > > > > If you know what you quoted was a "by-line" and the question > posed > > > was > > > > > about > > > > > > the poll date(s).... why did you even try and continue to try to > add > > > any > > > > > > credence to it ?? You are that which you ever so feebly try to > > > condemn, > > > > > > inaccurate and unbelievable. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:05 AM, ReallyAngryIndo < > > > [email protected] > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > I know what I quoted dip shit: The date of the press release > from > > > the > > > > > > > company. And the company uses the poll to (sell)advi(c)se > countries > > > on > > > > > > > how to impove their "brand image" across the world. So I would > > > surmise > > > > > > > that it would be accurate than a poll taken by an extremely > biased > > > > > > > media group which stand to make a profit off the results being > > > > > > > negative. > > > > > > > > > And the poll posted by the original author representing the > opinion > > > of > > > > > > > America is taken from 900 repeat NINE HUNDRED people!? > > > > > > > > > So now 900 speak for 300,000,000+ ? > > > > > > > > > Wtf are you people smoking? > > > > > > > > > On Oct 6, 1:46 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > you quoted a by-line numb nuts.... NOT a poll date nor does > it > > > give > > > > > > > (cite) > > > > > > > > the sample error rate...gee must be a REAL poll !!! > > > > > > > > > > How gullible ARE you ?? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Mark M. Kahle, ,www.filacoffee.com-Hidequoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > -- > > > > Mark M. Kahle, ,www.filacoffee.com-Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > -- > > Mark M. Kahle, ,www.filacoffee.com- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > -- Mark M. Kahle, , www.filacoffee.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
