Our Egyptian man on the street nailed it ""They are handing him the Nobel Peace Prize because he isn’t George Bush."
By that standard, you are eligible for the Nobel Peace Prize.... http://jaltcoh.blogspot.com/2009/10/only-possible-explanation-why-president.html On Oct 9, 11:25 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > frankg, > > It's really rather simple. .Compared to the man he replaced Obama can > win a Nobel Peace Prize simply by going 9 whole months w/o invading > someone. > Kinda like a 300 lb. man appearing to be skinny by standing next to a > 600 llb. man. > > On Oct 9, 9:46 am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The continuation of the 'smoke and mirrors' presidency continues. The > > height of his mantle continues to get elevated without his ever doing > > anything. Just amazing. > > > On Oct 9, 7:53 am, "d.b.baker" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Headline of the day: > > > > London Times: "Absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel > > > peace prize" > > > > [Q] - Rarely has an award had such an obvious political and partisan > > > intent. It was clearly seen by the Norwegian Nobel committee as a way > > > of expressing European gratitude for an end to the Bush > > > Administration, approval for the election of America’s first black > > > president and hope that Washington will honour its promise to re- > > > engage with the world... > > > > The pretext for the prize was Mr Obama’s decision to “strengthen > > > international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples”. Many people > > > will point out that, while the President has indeed promised to > > > “reset” relations with Russia and offer a fresh start to relations > > > with the Muslim world, there is little so far to show for his fine > > > words. > > > --http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article68... > > > > On Oct 9, 7:27 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > What's left? The 2010 Oscars for Barack and Michelle as best actor and > > > > actress? > > > > > On Oct 9, 6:24 am, "d.b.baker" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Well, it was either him or Roman Polanski.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
