M. Johnson,

Amen to that brother, could not have said it better.

On Oct 13, 2:00 pm, "M. Johnson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Partisan PoliticsA Fool’s Game for the MassesRobert Higgs
> Because I despise politics in general, and the two major parties in this 
> country in particular, I go through life constantly bemused by all the weight 
> that people put on partisan political loyalties and on adherence to the 
> normative demarcations the parties promote. Henry Adams observed that 
> “politics, as a practice, whatever its professions, has always been the 
> systematic organization of hatreds.” This marshalling of hatreds is not the 
> whole of politics, to be sure, but it is an essential element. Thus, 
> Democrats encourage people to hate big corporations, and Republicans 
> encourage people to hate welfare recipients.
> Of course, it’s all a fraud, designed to distract people from the overriding 
> reality of political life, which is that the state and its principal 
> supporters are constantly screwing the rest of us, regardless of which party 
> happens to control the presidency and the Congress. Amid all the partisan 
> sound and fury, hardly anybody notices that political reality boils down to 
> two “parties”: (1) those who, in one way or another, use state power to bully 
> and live at the expense of others; and (2) those unfortunate others.
> Even when politics seems to involve life-and-death issues, the partisan 
> divisions often only obscure the overriding political realities. So, 
> Democrats say that anti-abortion Republicans, who claim to have such 
> tremendous concern for saving the lives of the unborn, have no interest 
> whatever in saving the lives of those already born, such as the poor children 
> living in the ghetto. And Republicans say that Democrats, who claim to have 
> such tremendous concern for the poor, systematically contribute to the 
> perpetuation of poverty by the countless taxes and regulations they load onto 
> business owners who would otherwise be in better position to hire and train 
> the poor and thereby to hasten their escape from poverty.
> If the unborn children happen to be living in the wombs of women on whom U.S. 
> bombs and rockets rain down in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, however, all 
> Republican concerns for the unborn evaporate completely, as do the Democrats’ 
> concerns for the poor children living in the selfsame bombarded villages. 
> Both parties’ positions would seem to rest on very flexible and selective 
> morality, if indeed either party may be said to have any moral basis at all, 
> notwithstanding their chronic public displays of “moral” wailing and gnashing 
> of teeth.
> In any event, the parties’ principles of hatred have never passed the sniff 
> test; indeed, they reek of hypocrisy. Thus, while railing against the 
> “corporate rich,” the Democrats rely heavily on the financial support of 
> Hollywood moguls and multi-millionaire trial lawyers, among other fat cats. 
> And the Republicans, while denouncing the welfare mother who makes off with a 
> few hundred undeserved bucks a month, vociferously support the hundreds of 
> billions of dollars in welfare channeled to Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and 
> General Electric, among many other companies, via larcenous “defense” 
> contracts, Export-Import Bank subsidies, and countless other forms of 
> government support for “national security” and service to “the public 
> interest” as Republicans conceive of these nebulous, yet rhetorically useful 
> entities.
> Notice, too, that although ordinary Democrats and Republicans often harbor 
> intense mutual hatreds, the party leaders in Congress rub shoulders quite 
> amiably as a rule. Regardless of which party has control, the loyal 
> opposition can always be counted on to remain ever so loyal and ready to cut 
> a deal. And why not? These ostensible political opponents are engaged in a 
> process of plunder from which the bigwigs in both parties can expect to 
> profit, whatever the ebb and flow of party politics. At bottom, the United 
> States has a one-party state, cleverly designed to disguise the country’s 
> true class division and to divert the masses from a recognition that unless 
> you are a political insider connected with one of the major parties, you 
> almost certainlywillbe ripped off on balance. Such exploitation, after all, 
> is precisely what the state and the political parties that operate it are for.
> Yet, rather than hating the predatory state, the masses have been conditioned 
> to love this blood-soaked beast and even, if called upon, to lay down their 
> lives and the lives of their children on its behalf. From my vantage point on 
> the outside, peering in, I am perpetually mystified that so many people are 
> taken in by the phony claims and obscurantist party rhetoric. As the song 
> says, “clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right,” but unlike the fellow 
> in the song, I am not “stuck in the middle.” Instead, I float above all of 
> this wasted emotion, looking down on it with disgust and sadness. Moreover, 
> as an economist, I am compelled to regret such an enormously inefficient 
> allocation of hatred.http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/118268.html
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to