> The point is spelled out quite well I thought. Then thought is not your strong suit.
> You can debate whatever you want, and decide who's over the top or serious > the way you see fit. Thanks, but I wasn't looking for your permission. > And rest assured, we will see how you see fit. Well, we already know how YOU see fit. That you feel the need to reprint attacks on Coulter while feeding at the Olbermann / Mathhews trough is rather telling. On Oct 15, 12:49 pm, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 15, 11:37 am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Studio, > > > What's your point? That Ann Coulter is a female Sean Hannity? Didn't > > we already know that. > > The point is spelled out quite well I thought. And no, not everyone > knows, admits or confirms that Ann 'the man' Coulter is a > propagandist. Some conservatives here have been in denial that a > Conservative was actually the President for the last 8 years. > > > The left, of course, also has their extremists > > (Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews, etc.). They are all "propagandists" > > and they all just want your attention. It might be fun debating their > > 'over the top' comments, but you just can't take any of them > > seriously. > > You can debate whatever you want, and decide who's over the top or > serious the way you see fit. And rest assured, we will see how you see > fit. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
