LOL! Mr Fuckin Minutia obsesses over YET ANOTHER word.

1 a : the ordinary language people use in speaking or writing

Get a dictionary, moron.

On Oct 26, 10:25 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
> Zeb,
>
> Jesus H. Christ, NOW you apparantly don't know what the fuck prose
> means.
>
> On Oct 26, 7:23 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > You know what the word "only" means in the dictionary. It is when
> > people put it into prose that it confuses you.
>
> > On Oct 26, 5:53 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Zeb,
>
> > > I know. Bullshit lad, at least I know what the word "only" means.
>
> > > On Oct 26, 4:49 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Never said you were my pal. But I'm used to your inability to
> > > > understand simple English sentences, so your confusion is not a
> > > > surprise. You are exhibiting willful ignorance. It is unimpressive.
>
> > > > On Oct 26, 5:33 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Zeb,
>
> > > > > Yep, sure is. Also something called "bullshitting", "lying your ass
> > > > > off" and praying like hell the person(s) you're addressing are as dumb
> > > > > as a sack of hammers and won't detect your bullshit.
>
> > > > > I am not dick's "pal", nor yours.
>
> > > > > On Oct 26, 3:50 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > There is something called "a manner of speaking." It means 
> > > > > > everything
> > > > > > you say isn't necessarily LITERAL. If you tell a pal, for instance, 
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > "drop dead" when he makes an asinine request of you, it doesn't mean
> > > > > > you actually want him to expire. Just as when Dick says the
> > > > > > Republicans are the "only" ones trying to cut waste he means that 
> > > > > > Dems
> > > > > > do NOT have this as a priority and few if any are joining 
> > > > > > Republicans
> > > > > > in their quest. Rather than obsessing over the literal accuracy of
> > > > > > "only" you might point to an example of Democrat waste cutting
> > > > > > crusaders or just agree with him.
>
> > > > > > On Oct 26, 4:40 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Zeb,
>
> > > > > > > So, tell Dick to learn to speak and use English correctly.
> > > > > > > BTW, I got rid of him, didn't I?
>
> > > > > > > On Oct 26, 3:38 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > >I try to dumb my questions down
>
> > > > > > > > You don't have to try to hard. Most of your questions are dumb. 
> > > > > > > > You
> > > > > > > > obsess over minutia. Fucking "only." LOL!
>
> > > > > > > > On Oct 25, 3:10 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > dick,
>
> > > > > > > > > Amazing. So you really don't know what the word "only" means.
> > > > > > > > > I try to dumb my questions down to the level that only a 
> > > > > > > > > simple yes or
> > > > > > > > > no is required and STILL you guys can't do it. THEN have the
> > > > > > > > > unmitigated gall to infer OTHER people are the problem. 
> > > > > > > > > Fucking
> > > > > > > > > amazing....really.
>
> > > > > > > > > On Oct 25, 1:58 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > No.  As I said, you really cannot comprehend above the 
> > > > > > > > > > "Dick and Jane"
> > > > > > > > > > level of writing.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Hollywood wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > dick,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Blah, blah .balh. Here's a direct quote from your post " 
> > > > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > Republicans are the ONLY ones trying to cut the waste".
> > > > > > > > > > > THEN I asked you if you were sure you wanted to stand by 
> > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > statement.
> > > > > > > > > > > THEN I pointed out a simple yes or no would suffice..
> > > > > > > > > > > And you're STILL yapping away......
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Not my problem you want to pretend to be so stupid as to 
> > > > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > > understand the meaning of a simple word such as "only".
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I assume you wish to now withdraw the word "only" from 
> > > > > > > > > > > your statement
> > > > > > > > > > > and simple say you agree in principle with the comments 
> > > > > > > > > > > made in the
> > > > > > > > > > > article?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 25, 1:17 pm, dick thompson 
> > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Sorry you had to read all that wording and failed to 
> > > > > > > > > > >> understand that I
> > > > > > > > > > >> was standing by what this guy is talking about.  I 
> > > > > > > > > > >> realize that you need
> > > > > > > > > > >> every little thing spelled out for you unless it is Zero 
> > > > > > > > > > >> talking.  In
> > > > > > > > > > >> the case of Zero it is received wisdom for you but in 
> > > > > > > > > > >> all other cases it
> > > > > > > > > > >> has to be brought down to Dick and Jane level for you to 
> > > > > > > > > > >> comprehend.
>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Hollywood wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> dick,
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> A simple yes or no will do just fine, thank you. Do you 
> > > > > > > > > > >>> stand by the
> > > > > > > > > > >>> statement in question or do you not?
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Oct 25, 12:30 pm, dick thompson 
> > > > > > > > > > >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Whare are the Democrats who are fighting against pork 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> and the other
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> waste in government.  Look at Bawney.  With all the 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> organizations we
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> already have to investigate and control the financial 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> industry, he now
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> wants to set up another super investigative and 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> controlling agency over
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> the same industry.  Bet that the agencies fight over 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> what is controlled
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> and the industry ends up lost in the middle but who 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> cares; Bawney got
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> the rights to crow over how he now has better control 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> over the financial
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> industry with this agency.
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> And that is just the tip of the iceberg of what the 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Dems are up to.  
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Check out the rest of their programs.  Now find me a 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Dem who is really
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> fighting against this.  Even the Blue Dog Dems are 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> just paying lip
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> service to being for the public and then they vote 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> just like San Fran
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Nan and Dirty Harry Reid tell them.
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Hollywood wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> dick,
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> You SURE you want to stand by your statement that 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> ONLY the Republicans
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> are trying to cut waste in government, both state and 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> federal?
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Don't want to waste my time more than I must.
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Oct 25, 11:04 am, dick thompson 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Nice try, but no cigar.  The Republicans are the 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> only ones trying to cut
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> the waste.  And not all of them.  Check out who is 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> calling for getting
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> rid of pork in Congress - see any Dems there?  Check 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> out who is putting
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> in the most pork and check the party.  Bet the Dems 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> are the biggies on
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> this one.  Check out who is calling for even 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> publicizing the pork - Sen
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Coburn is the major one who comes to mind on that.  
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Check out the states
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> that are doing the worst job of living within their 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> budget.  See any red
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> states there?  Didn't think so.
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Hollywood wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> dick,
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I'd say about as good being understood by our 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Republican overlords in
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> state and federal govt. Why?
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Oct 25, 10:39 am, dick thompson 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>         Permalink
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> <http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/200...>
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> User Image
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> <http://www.boston.com/community/persona.html?UID=beb75cda44401803a865...>
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> mottom
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> <http://www.boston.com/community/persona.html?UID=beb75cda44401803a865...>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Part 1. Ms. Vennochi, Globe Journalist. 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Intelligent. Certainly capable,
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> but with a certain degree of affliction of 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> "political myopia" that
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> prevents her from seeing the bigger picture in 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> many matters. Perhaps, in
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> fairness, she cannot be faulted. When I was first 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> elected to the
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Massachusetts legislature many moons ago, 1964, I 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> was a young small town
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> guy who had returned from four years in the Navy, 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> had seen the power and
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the poverty of much of the Asian world as my ship, 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the aircraft carrier
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Boxer, visited Japan, Hong Kong, Bangkok, and 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> later, our planes flew
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> combat ground support for our forces in the Korean 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> conflict. I, then,
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> more safely off shore, would often stand on the 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> fantail [the rear deck
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> area of the ship] and gaze out into the blackness 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> of the Korean hills
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> and felt the pangs, for young guys like myself, 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> some that I knew
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> personally who were slogging up and down the 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> peninsular in mud and snow
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> and frigid cold, and I personally "could not help 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them," or be with
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> them. It was so much bigger than us as just 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> individuals.
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> In time when I returned home, I saw needs and 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> problems in my community,
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> felt I could and should "help" and served for 21 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> years as an elected
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> town official. Saw enormous problems on the state 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> level, the House
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Speaker was under a 50 count federal indictment, 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> state government had
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> run amuck, and I thought I could and should try to 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> "help." To this day,
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I never ever forgot the power and the poverty and 
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> the helplessness that
> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I saw and felt in
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to