Home <http://www.washingtontimes.com/> » News 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news> » *Politics* 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/politics>

Friday, November 20, 2009


  Coburn threatens health bill reading

Rate this story

/critic/1/1/79/401540/vote/?r=/news/2009/nov/20/coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading/
/critic/1/2/79/401540/vote/?r=/news/2009/nov/20/coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading/
/critic/1/3/79/401540/vote/?r=/news/2009/nov/20/coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading/
/critic/1/4/79/401540/vote/?r=/news/2009/nov/20/coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading/
/critic/1/5/79/401540/vote/?r=/news/2009/nov/20/coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading/

Average 5.00
after 1 votes
Login or register to rate this story <javascript:registration_callback();>

    * Font Size -
      
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/20/coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading/?source=newsletter_must-read-stories-today_more_news_carousel#>+
      
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/20/coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading/?source=newsletter_must-read-stories-today_more_news_carousel#>
    * Print
      
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/20/coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading//print/>
    * Email
      <http://www.washingtontimes.com/mailfriend/79/401540/1b7650c396/>
    * Comment
      
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/20/coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading/?source=newsletter_must-read-stories-today_more_news_carousel#comments>
    * Tweet this!
      
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/20/coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading/?source=newsletter_must-read-stories-today_more_news_carousel#>
    * Yahoo! Buzz
      
<http://buzz.yahoo.com/buzz?publisherurn=washington_ti859&guid=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtontimes.com%2Fnews%2F2009%2Fnov%2F20%2Fcoburn-threatens-health-bill-reading%2F>
    *
      Share <http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&pub=washingtontimes>

    * Article
    * Comments (9)
      
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/20/coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading/comments/>
    * Click-2-Listen
      
<javascript:OpenC2LWindow('WashingtonTimes','news_2009_nov_20_coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading',m_nwamp3_file,'dfp_zone='+sitepage,'WashingtonTimes','','Production');void(0);>
    * Videos
      
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/20/coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading/videos/>


        More Politics Stories

    * EXCLUSIVE: Hoffman considering recount claim
      
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/20/exclusive-hoffman-considering-recount-claim/>
    * Senate health care bill creates new marriage penalty
      
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/20/married-couples-face-tax-in-senate-health-care-bil/>
    * GOP challenges job stimulus data
      
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/20/gop-challenges-job-stimulus-data/>
    * House OKs $210 billion to help out doctors
      
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/20/house-oks-210-billion-to-help-out-doctors/>

By Joseph Curl <http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/joseph-curl/>

Pity the poor Senate clerks.

The 2,074-page Senate health care bill released this week by Senate 
Majority Leader Harry Reid would take at least 34 hours to read cover to 
cover - and that's just what Sen. Tom Coburn wants done on the Senate 
floor.

The Oklahoma Republican has threatened to force the Senate clerk (or 
more likely, a team of clerks), to read the massive bill before the full 
Senate moves to consider the legislation as expected on Saturday.

The move is strictly according to Senate rules, which say any senator 
can demand a bill be read in its entirety before debate begins. Although 
Democrats could, if they wish, repeatedly make motions to end the Senate 
soliloquy, Republicans on the floor could object, and the reading would 
continue.

What's even more interesting is that Senate Rule XIV, Paragraph 2, 
states that every bill and joint resolution "shall receive three 
readings prior to its passage."

"Upon demand of a senator, these readings shall be on three different 
legislative days," the rules says.

At a minute a page - a reasonable pace because the pages are 
double-spaced and in a rather large typeface - it would take 34.5 hours 
to read straight through the measure.

But that's averaging a page a minute. Republican leadership and gallery 
staff say the reading - with occasional slowdowns for legalistic jargon 
and sips of water for parched throats - could take more like 48 to 54 
hours.

The bill-reading would eclipse the longest filibuster in the Senate, 
conducted by Sen. Strom Thurmond. On Aug. 29, 1957, the South Carolina 
Republican wrapped up a 24-hour, 18-minute-long tirade meant to stall 
voting on the Civil Rights Act of 1957. It didn't work.

Despite hours of calling Mr. Coburn's office to see whether he'll really 
force a reading - or three - no one called back. Perhaps his aides are 
preparing to read the bill themselves and are saving their voices.

/Joseph Curl can be reached at jcurl/@/washingtontimes.com.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/20/coburn-threatens-health-bill-reading/?source=newsletter_must-read-stories-today_more_news_carousel



/Subscribe to this story's comments 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/rss/comments/79/401540/>

persianprof

Let's hear it for Oklahoma! Coburn and the rest of the Congressional 
delegation aren't impressed by Obama. They know he's a jerk. They know 
he and his henchmen are selling this country to China! I hope Coburn 
asks for it to be read THREE times!
Mark as offensive 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/admin/offensivecontent/manage/add/10/207690/>

munchkin

I think every single word should be read to the Senate and on C-Span so 
that every American could hear what's in it. As Beck pointed out, it's 
chock full of new tax increases and new reports are out that bill covers 
LESS than 2% of the population, while collapsing the economy.
Mark as offensive 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/admin/offensivecontent/manage/add/10/207781/>

TexRancher

READ THE BILL!! That's the only way we can have assurance those idiots 
voting for this mess know what they're voting on. No excuses later that 
"we didn't know"! No bill should be passed without all those voting on 
it have read it or some Democrats, read to them!
Mark as offensive 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/admin/offensivecontent/manage/add/10/207809/>

ssn042

Question: Why do we have a "reform" bill, in both houses of the congress 
that are about 2000 pages long? Answer: so it can be packed with little 
control and taxing features that no one gets a chance to read before 
they vote on it. Everyone ought to write their senators right now and 
ask them "If this bill is so damn good for America and the American 
people why have both houses of congress SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED THEMSELVES 
from being covered by this bill? Simple question. I'd love to see the 
answers posted somewhere.
Mark as offensive 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/admin/offensivecontent/manage/add/10/207882/>

CherryBomb

CLAP CLAP CLAP Thank you so much Mr. Coburn !!!!! I hope you stick to 
your guns.
Mark as offensive 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/admin/offensivecontent/manage/add/10/207888/>

singer23

What! Read a bill? How old fashoned, why would you read a bill? There 
might be something that the American public wouldn't like in it! Just 
pass it! We won't know the difference, we're just a bunch of sheep, 
BAA-BAA BAA! Thanks Mr. Coburn, I'd vote for you! I think most of the 
American people are ready to move out of: "Obamaland!"
Mark as offensive 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/admin/offensivecontent/manage/add/10/207937/>

fddbooks

Great idea. And read slowly, please.
Mark as offensive 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/admin/offensivecontent/manage/add/10/207947/>

jwmeritt

On what planet is "read something before you vote on it" and "comply 
with the rules" a threat?
Mark as offensive 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/admin/offensivecontent/manage/add/10/207958/>

bigjohnmiska

I say to Mr. Coburn...GO FOR IT!!!!!
Mark as offensive 
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/admin/offensivecontent/manage/add/10/207963/>

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to