The rule in Washington is to always release embarrassing news on a Friday
evening — and when it is REALLY, REALLY, REALLY shameful put it out on
Christmas Eve.

Greg Scandlen




http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/24/AR2009122401588.html

*U.S. promises unlimited financial assistance to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac
*
By Zachary A. Goldfarb
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 25, 2009; A01

The Obama administration pledged Thursday to provide unlimited financial
assistance to mortgage giants Fannie Mae <
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/post200/2007/FNM/>  and Freddie Mac <
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/post200/2007/FRE/> , an eleventh-hour
move that allows the government to exceed the current $400 billion cap on
emergency aid without seeking permission from a bailout-weary Congress.

The Christmas Eve announcement by the Treasury Department means that it can
continue to run the companies, which were seized last year, as arms of the
government for the rest of President Obama's current term.

But even as the administration was making this open-ended financial
commitment, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac disclosed that they had received
approval from their federal regulator to pay $42 million in Wall
Street-style compensation packages to 12 top executives for 2009.

The compensation packages, including up to $6 million each to Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac's chief executives, come amid an ongoing public debate about
lavish payments to executives at banks and other financial firms that have
received taxpayer aid. But while many firms on Wall Street have repaid the
assistance, there is no prospect that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will do so.


The administration faced a congressionally mandated deadline of Dec. 31 to
increase the amount of aid it could provide to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,
which together have already received $111 billion in assistance.

Treasury said Thursday that its decision did not mean the firms would need
$200 billion or more apiece, but that it instead was seeking to assure
markets that the government would stand behind the companies. In a
statement, Treasury said the move "should leave no uncertainty about the
Treasury's commitment to support these firms as they continue to play a
vital role in the housing market during this current crisis."

By promising to keep the companies solvent, the government can maintain its
sweeping power over the housing market. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have
played a central role in Obama administration policies to keep mortgage
interest rates low, restructure unaffordable mortgages, stop foreclosures
and funnel money to housing programs around the country.

The Bush administration took over the firms in September 2008 as the
financial crisis entered its most severe phase and promised $200 billion to
keep the companies solvent. The Obama administration later doubled that
figure.

While the ultimate cost of the bailouts is unknown, the administration
estimated earlier this year it would cost $171 billion, and some officials
said they expect it could rise further. Analysts have said it could be much
higher. The cost will depend in part on how aggressively the administration
continues to use the firms to stimulate the housing market because these
steps could curtail profitability.

Under the terms of the latest decision, the administration's open-ended
commitment will expire in 2012. Then, the firms will only be allowed to
receive the balance of the $400 billion remaining today -- about $290
billion.

The administration is set to release broad principles in February for
reforming the companies. Many experts predict that the government will have
no choice but to hold on indefinitely to many of the companies' most
troubled assets -- mortgage investments made during the housing bubble to
less-than-worthy borrowers.

But an administration official said it could take several years to resolve
the future of the companies, especially if Congress isn't keen to take up
the politically charged issue during the 2010 midterm election year, and if
the government wants to preserve the ability to influence the housing
market. The companies together own or insure the majority of home loans, and
no viable private system exists that could replace them.

Even as the administration has broadened its commitment to Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac, it said it would wind down mortgage-assistance programs,
including one that bought Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's mortgage investments.


Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have long been targets for Republicans, who say
they are evidence of how government support for the housing market
contributed to the financial crisis.

"The Obama administration's decision to write a blank check with taxpayer
dollars for the continued bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is
appalling," said Rep. Scott Garrett (R-N.J.), a member of the House
Financial Services subcommittee that oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
"Not only is this a continued bailout of failed entities that need to be
privatized to protect the taxpayer, the timing of the announcement is
clearly designed to try and sneak the bailout by the taxpayers."

On Thursday, federal officials defended the administration's new bailout
authority and the compensation packages. They said the pay was necessary to
retain talented executives who can oversee the companies' vast mortgage
holdings.

Fannie Mae chief executive Michael J. Williams and Freddie Mac chief
executive Charles E. Haldeman each will receive a $900,000 base salary. The
rest of their compensation will be in incentive payments and bonuses
dependent on whether they stay with the companies and achieve business
targets. The compensation of other top executives will follow a similar
formula.

While the pay is significantly more than what Fannie and Freddie executives
received a year ago, the packages are less than what top company officials
got before the government takeover. Only five executives at each firm will
be eligible to receive more than $500,000 in salary.

"The management of these companies involves responsibility for $2 to $3
trillion of mortgage assets," said Edward DeMarco, acting director of the
Federal Housing Finance Agency, the chief regulator of Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac. "It is critical to the taxpayers' financial interests that
these assets be carefully managed in a difficult environment to minimize
taxpayer losses."

-- 
This group is created for discussing national issues to stop the current
administration from transforming this country into something not intended by
the founders. Any discussions that are not relevant to that topic will be
deleted.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Tea Party Patriots" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]<tea-party-patriots%[email protected]>
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tea-party-patriots?hl=en?hl=en

For more information on Tea Party Patriots, please visit
http://www.teapartypatriots.org.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to