*Center for Security Policy* | *Dec 28, 2009*
By Frank Gaffney, Jr.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano came in for some well-deserved
criticism for declaring over the weekend that "the system worked" with
respect to Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's effort to blow up the plane he was
flying from Amsterdam to Detroit. By Monday, she was backpedalling,
acknowledging that "our system did not work in this instance."

In truth, for a lot of Americans, Ms. Napolitano has not had much
credibility since she tried to ban "terrorism" from the official lexicon of
her department. But arguably the most serious indication that she is wholly
ill-equipped to carry out her present responsibilities can be found in
another - as yet uncorrected - statement she made on Sunday. She told CNN's
"State of the Union" that, "Right now, we have no indication [that
Abdulmutallab's actions were] part of anything larger."

Not "part of anything larger"? Is she serious? Does she take us for fools?

Read my lips, Secretary Napolitano: Abdulmutallab's actions were absolutely,
positively part of something larger. What they were part of is the
comprehensive theo-political-legal program that authoritative Islam calls
Shariah.

This supremacist program requires its adherents to engage in jihad, or holy
war, to bring about the triumph of Islam under a global theocracy, one that
will impose Shariah on Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Pursuant to Shariah,
jihad should - wherever practicable - be pursued through the terrifying use
of violence. Where violent jihad is impractical or would be
counterproductive, Shariah directs faithful Muslims to use other means to
advance the same goal. Koran expert Robert Spencer calls the latter "stealth
jihad."

The question must be asked: Are we seeing a dramatic increase in violent
jihadism in America - National Public Radio reported on Saturday that there
had been fourteen attempts in 2009 (compared to two or three in recent
years) and that they had been increasingly "operational" in character, not
just "aspirational" - because violence is now seen to be practicable here?

Specifically, could it be that jihadists have been emboldened by what they
see as weakness and/or fecklessness on the part of the U.S. administration?
Could steps Team Obama has taken - such as the closure of Guantanamo Bay,
the release of some hardened terrorists held there to Yemen (where
Abdulmuttalab claims he got his plastic explosive device), granting others
access to civilian courts and constitutional rights, etc. - actually be
emboldening them to believe that murder and mayhem will accelerate the
defeat and conquest of the infidel West?

The U.S. government was warned by Abdulmutallab's father at least two months
ago that his son had been "radicalized" - in other words, that he had
embraced Shariah. That being the case, he was transformed from being one of
the hundreds of millions of Muslims around the world who are not a problem
into one of those who are.

In the wake of the latest, narrowly averted massacre at the hands of
jihadists, we are being promised executive branch reviews of the practice
that, in the wake of his father's warning, put Abdulmuttalab on the
improbably named Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE) database -
but did not revoke his multiple entry U.S. visa or otherwise keep him from
flying. Multiple congressional investigations will be launched, as well.

Such reviews will, however, amount to little more than a waste of time and
taxpayer resources - and possibly a serious distraction - if they do not
address, and henceforth require screening for, the motivation for such
attacks. It is absurd to think that "the system" is going to do anything
other than exponentially increase the amount of discomfort for airline
passengers as long as it does not weed out those who embrace as an article
of faith their duty to destroy us.

We need to be equally clear about the menace posed by those who adhere to
Shariah but profess to seek to "Islamicize" America through non-violent
means. In the wake of the recent actual and averted attacks, the press has,
for example, trumpeted the views of parents of five jihadists from Northern
Virginia, imams at mosques where they worshipped and prominent fixtures in
the various Muslim Brotherhood front organizations. Unsurprisingly, all of
them profess shock - shock! - that these young people would want to do as
they have been taught to, pursuant to Shariah: namely, follow the way of
jihad against the *Dar al-Harb* (the "House of War" that is the non-Muslim
world).

Nowhere in these disinformation operations is any mention made of the Muslim
Brotherhood's self-declared mission in America. According to an internal
Brotherhood strategic plan dating from 1991, that mission is: "A kind of
grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from
within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of
the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made
victorious over all other religions."

As long as Janet Napolitano, Attorney General Eric Holder, the intelligence
community, law enforcement, the military, the media and most especially
President Obama refuse to acknowledge what animates our enemies, we will
never develop an effective strategy for defeating them, let alone
successfully implement it. Part and parcel of achieving such an
understanding is to stop allowing the stealth jihadists in our midst to
blind us to this reality.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to