Thank You, Charles Krauthammer
  <http://www.bizzyblog.com/2009/12/28/thank-you-charles-krauthammer/>

Filed under: Taxes & Government 
<http://www.bizzyblog.com/category/taxes-government/> --- TBlumer @ 
10:17 pm

Rephrasing what I've mentioned a couple of times in the past week, when 
we desperately need an updated version of the December 1981 model of 
Ronald Reagan 
<http://www.bizzyblog.com/2009/12/23/ronald-reagans-december-23-1981-address-to-the-nation-on-christmas-and-poland/>,
 
we instead get the 2009 clunker known as Barack Obama.

Charles Krauthammer rips into Obama's relative indifference 
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohF2NayTNAA> (HT Taxman Blog 
<http://taxmanblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/krauthammer-rips-obama-meaningless.html>),
 
after Fox's fair and balanced Jim Engel attempted to give President 
'Prompter 
<http://www.bizzyblog.com/2009/07/21/and-you-wonder-why-i-call-him-president-prompter/>
 
cover for having uttered "strong words":

*Full Text:*

    *President Obama:* The decision of Iraq's leaders to govern through
    fear and tyranny will not succeed in making those aspirations go
    away. As I said in Oslo, it's telling when governments fear the
    aspirations of its own people more than the power of any other nation.

    *Jim Engel:* Now, strong words, Charles, but what is the
    administration doing? What can it do with a regime that is so
    obstreperous <http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/obstreperous>?

    *Charles Krauthammer:* Flaccid
    <http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/flaccid> words. Meaningless
    words. He talks about aspirations, he talks about rights, he talks
    about "justice" in the statement he made. This isn't about
    "justice," this isn't about a low minimum wage, this isn't about the
    absence of a public option in health care. This is about freedom.

    This is a revolution in the streets. Revolutions happen quickly.
    There is a moment here in which if the thugs in the streets who are
    shooting on the crowds stop shooting, it's over, and the regime will
    fall. The courage of the demonstrators and their boldness isn't only
    a demonstration of their courage, it's an indication of a shift in
    the balance of power. The regime is weakening.

    This is a hinge of history. Everything in the region will change if
    the regime is changed. Obama ought to be strong out there in saying
    "It's an illegitimate government, we stand shoulder to shoulder with
    the people in the street."

    He talks about diplomacy. He should be urging our Western allies who
    have relations to cut them off, isolate the regime. To ostracize it
    he ought to be going into UN, every forum, and denouncing it. This
    is a moment in history and he's missing it.

Ronald Reagan didn't miss it. You'll note in his December 23, 1981 
speech <http://www.bizzyblog.com/%3Ca%20href=> that he announced 
specific symbolic and substantive actions. They weren't overwhelming by 
any stretch, but they demonstrated a willingness to do something beyond 
complaining. And of course, Thatcher, Pope John Paul, Lane Kirkland, and 
many others also started doing a lot of heavy lifting behind the scenes.

By contrast, Barack Obama is from all appearances avoiding doing 
anything, and even seems to require convincing to get in front of a 
microphone.

Not only is Obama missing the moment, he is doing way too much to give 
the regime of Khamenei, who really runs things 
<http://www.bizzyblog.com/2009/06/21/now-they-tell-us-how-many-know-that-khamenei-has-virtually-limitless-authority/>,
 
and his puppet Ahmadinejad legitimacy they do not deserve.

Elections matter, don't they?

_____________________________________________________

*Related:* Michelle Malkin 
<http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/28/open-thread-obamas-statement-on-the-christmas-day-jihadi-attack/>
 
on Obama's response to Flight 253 --- "Perfunctory, hasty, and 
bloodless." Obama's reax to the attempted takedown is related to the 
situation in Iran because Iran funds and facilitates Al Qaeda 
<http://xrdarabia.org/2009/03/29/is-iran-funding-al-qaeda/> in the 
Arabian Peninsula, which would include Yemen 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yemen>.

Comments [moderated] (0) <http://www.bizzyblog.com/?comments_popup=15147>

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to