http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/obamas_image_what_a_difference.html



December 28, 2009

*Obama's Image: What a Difference a Year Makes*

*By* *Ed Lasky* <http://www.americanthinker.com/ed_lasky/>



Almost a year has passed since January 20, 2009 -- when the waters of the
ocean no longer rose and America began to heal from the depredations of
Republicans. Barack Obama has been our president for that long, and the
people have started to wise up.



The light that shines on Barack Obama as president has reflected back an
image that bears very little similarity to the iconic visage that floated
above us all in 2008. Why has Barack Obama betrayed so many allies, broken
so many promises, thrown so many pledges and people under the bus?



One simple aphorism (paraphrasing Winston Churchill) can explain it all.
Barack Obama is no longer a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.
Much about his past remains murky, but faced with the need to govern, he has
given the American people plenty of evidence of his nature...if only they
will look.



Obama is a cynic wrapped in a hypocrite inside a bully.



This comes as a shock to many, who are dismayed to find that he is "just a
politician," as Reverend Wright, Jr. (who knows him so well) called
him<http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/04/wright_on_obama_hes_a_politici.html>back
in 2008. But Wright was being all too kind and generous to his future
former parishioner (Wright followed a long and ever-growing line of people
trampled by Barack Obama's rise.)



But Barack Obama is far more than just a politician. We all swallow a lot
from politicians; we know that many pander and narrowcast, changing their
message to suit their audience. But Obama expressly campaigned as a man who
would not do this. He was the candidate of hope and change -- he would bring
a big broom to sweep clean the Augean Stables known as Washington, D.C. He
called forth the better angels of our nature (hat tip: Honest Abe Lincoln,
one of the truly honest politicians from Illinois) and tapped into a deep
yearning for the rarest of the real things: an honest leader.



*A cynic*



Obama defined his campaign with high-sounding
rhetoric<http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-goldberg22-2009dec22,0,7045732.column>that
"[his] rival in this race is not other candidates, but cynicism." The
line resonated and soon became his mantra.



He later asked us to fight cynicism and revealingly told us that cynics
believe they are
smarter<http://www.esquire.com/features/barack-obama-0608.>than
everyone else. To this it could be said that Obama knows what that is
like.



Could there be anything more cynical than to look upon Americans as being
too forgetful to remember all the broken promises Obama made?



These include -- but are not limited to -- a promise that there would be no
health care mandates (there are); that he would take a scalpel to the budget
and bring down the deficit (headed towards the stratosphere as he rewards
his own special interest groups); and that he would end earmarks (his
spending bills are polluted by them; he is, after all, a Chicago
politician).



He promised to close Gitmo -- not a done deal, and like many deadlines he
promised, no one is sure when or if this will happen.



He promised the end of partisanship, but he has stoked it to a roaring blaze
with his refusal to work with Republicans. He promised to end our wars, but
now he is sending more forces into Afghanistan.



He stated that he would fight the gay marriage ban, but instead he ended up
supporting it, in effect, by defending the Defense of Marriage Act.



He promised the most transparent administration in history, but instead he
imposes layers of secrecy and invokes executive powers to cloak his
administration from scrutiny (e.g., his use of executive privilege to
protect Desiree Rogers, his social secretary, from questioning regarding the
WhiteHouseGate-crashers).



We were promised that if we passed the stimulus bill under Barack Obama's
presidency, then the unemployment rate would drop below 8% by now -- and
here we are, during Christmas season, cruising along at a solid 10% (17% if
we include the underemployed and those who left the workforce because they
saw no prospects of landing a job).



We were promised that the anti-Bush would restore respect for America around
the world and bring international comity. Instead, he has alienated our
allies and empowered our adversaries -- a dynamic that has brought all but
zero benefits to America (very little cooperation in Afghanistan, on
"climate change," or on Iran's nuclear program). While he may have snagged
himself a Nobel Peace Prize, the leaders of the world are increasingly
treating him, and America, with disrespect and
contempt<http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/obama_praises_NuPTfoiIjqtEu92UmDiwaP/1>
.



The betrayals are so breathtaking and widespread (all of his promises have
an expiration date) that all one can surmise is that the ultimate cynic is
the One who campaigned against cynicism.



We can sense that Obama is a cynic by referring back to his own definition:
someone who thinks he is smarter than everyone else.



We have abundant evidence of this derisive
attitude<http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/11/17/081117fa_fact_lizza?printable=true>
.

I think that I'm a better speechwriter than my speechwriters. I know more
about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors. And I'll
tell you right now that I'm gonna think I'm a better political director than
my political director.

Obama had the ego to think he was better than the key experts playing roles
in his victory: He is apparently smarter than his policy directors and
political directors, and he's a better speechwriter to boot.



We know how Obama feels about
small-town<http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0408/Obama_on_smalltown_PA_Clinging_religion_guns_xenophobia.html>Americans:
They are bitter yokels who cling to guns or religion or antipathy
towards people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment. But he has
additionally demeaned a wide range of other Americans (doctors, cops,
Special Olympics contestants, and many more, as you can see via the
Insulter-in-Chief<http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/insulterinchief.html>).
And how many of us are the "typical white
person<http://www.usnews.com/blogs/news-desk/2008/03/21/obama-typical-white-person-comment-delights-clinton-aides.html>"
he derided in the not-so-distant past? Patriots who wear flags on their
lapels? They are among the great unwashed.



We also know how Obama feels about people living in suburbia. He has no use
for those people in the gray flannel suits. He said, in an un-teleprompted
remark: "I'm not interested in suburbs. The suburbs bore
me<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/28/us/politics/28obama.html?pagewanted=2&ei=5090&en=bed3d00e987394c2&ex=1327640400&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss>
."



As Barack Obama has intoned, words matter.



Yes, they do Mr. President, especially in the days of YouTube, Google, and
the internet. These are the tools the common folk can tap to remember your
promises -- and your breaking of them.



These are the videos we can watch instead of the redacted versions put out
by your pals and accomplices in the media --those versions scrubbed clean of
your malapropisms, mistakes, stammering, evasions, and most importantly,
your broken promises. Only a cynic would think of us as being too forgetful
or ignorant to recognize the Big Lie.



Only a certifiable cynic would consider the American people so unperceptive
as to not recognize the wide gap between the image and the reality, the
promises made and broken, the differences between the smiling visage
on the Shepard
Fairey 
posters<http://www.coolhunting.com/archives/2008/01/shepard_fairey.php>(themselves
a
fraud<http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/culturemonster/2009/10/shepard-fairey-admits-to-wrongdoing-in-associated-press-lawsuit.html>--
how symbolic!) and the hectoring, finger-pointing, vengeful curmudgeon
we
now have in the Oval Office.



*A hypocrite*



The hypocrisy knows no bounds, either.



A hypocrite decries the role of money in politics and then breaks his
promise to accept public financing for his presidential campaign (because he
could see the money rolling in) while his challenger kept his promise to
abide by the campaign law he himself created. Was there a certain degree of
cynicism displayed there by Obama, knowing McCain was hoisted on his own
petard?



A hypocrite preaches that he will bring us together as a people and heal our
wounds when he wants our votes -- but after he wins, he practices the
politics of polarization and
declares<http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2009/03/64320451/1>that
he wants not "to quell people's anger," but to channel it.



Only a hypocrite would campaign on a platform of bringing us together ("we
are one people," "this was the moment -- this was the time -- when we came
together to remake this great nation," "there is no red America, there is no
blue America," etc.) and then stoke the very polarization that he promised
would end in the Age of Obama. His guru, Saul Alinksy, would be happy that
his *Rules for Radicals* has become the blueprint for how the president can
run, and ruin, a great nation.



Only a hypocrite would engage in as many baldfaced lies as our president has
over the past few years. The end of lobbyists? Balderdash. In fact, as a *
Politico* headline noted, "Lobbyists are on pace for a record
year<http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=B41E9106-18FE-70B2-A8C96E940F1F48D1>
."



And what is a lobbyist? What is the meaning of the term when Andy Stern,
head of the Service Employees International Union, is such a frequent
visitor to the White House that he might as well sublet some space in the
Lincoln Bedroom? Does anyone think Andy Stern is there to talk about the
weather? A lobbyist by any other name is still, in the end, a lobbyist.



Barack Obama has also countenanced the buying of
votes<http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30815.html>(payoffs to
states to get senators to sign on Harry Reid's health care
reform bill) in the Senate to get ObamaCare passed.



Obama decried the politics of fear during the campaign and then employed the
same as president -- as he did when he had the audacity to predict the
"bankruptcy" of
America<http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/198892>should
ObamaCare not pass. Or, before that, he augured the collapse of the
economy should the stimulus bill not pass. When every bill becomes a
do-or-die proposition, is that not playing the politics of fear?



Is it hypocritical to tout that tax dollars are not "monopoly money" and
that we "can't continue to spend as if deficits don't have consequences"
while engaging in irresponsible profligacy that would make Nero blanch?
(Obama has a history of
problems<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/27/us/politics/27obama.html>with
his own credit standing, but now he is playing with
our 
money<http://www.examiner.com/x-6356-Wichita-Independent-Examiner~y2009m12d21-Presidential-Hypocrisy--Obama-touts-tax-dollars-not-Monopoly-money>
.)



Does he think others are too stupid -- the belief that most defines a cynic
-- to realize that his deficit-plagued budgets are a sure way to penury for
us and our children and grandchildren?



Decrying fat cats while calling up a jet for a trip to Manhattan and a
stroll down the Great White Way of Broadway? Taking jaunts to Copenhagen to
try to snag the Olympics for his hometown pals in Chicago, who, no doubt,
were hoping to snag some lucre? That's the Chicago Way. One could go on.



*A bully*



All this cynicism and hypocrisy is wrapped up and empowered by the other
notable feature of Barack Obama: Our president is a bully.



Among the many examples: demeaning "fat cats" and telling Wall Street
bankers that he is the only one standing between them and the
pitchforks<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/23/AR2009082302381_2.html>;
telling a recalcitrant *Democratic* Congressman that they'd better toe the
line because "we are keeping score, brother"; belittling allies, such as the
Israelis, by telling them they need to be more self-reflective; trying to
impose a left-wing lunatic dictator wanna-be on the innocent people of
Honduras; dissing Eastern Europeans by not giving them a respectful warning
that he was going to break a promise to them regarding missile bases in
their nations; and forcing British  Prime Minister Gordon Brown to grovel in
a kitchen in order to have a few words with the President of the United
States. (This treatment is attributable,
speculates<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703442904574594043895540048.html>the
*Wall Street Journal*, to some personal bad will between Great Britain and
some Kenyan ancestors of Barack Obama. The man knows how to hold an
ancestral grudge -- even if it means the rest of America suffers from
slighting one of our formerly most treasured allies).



A bully is someone who can justify his actions by bragging that "I
won<http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0109/17862.html>."
Whatever happened to the slogan "Yes we can"? Whatever happened to the "new
kind of 
politics<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/06/oooh_the_new_politics.html>"?
Well, they're so 2008.



A bully is someone who taunts, "If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring
a 
gun<http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0608/Obama_brings_a_gun_to_a_knife_fight.html>
."



A bully is someone who runs roughshod over not only his opponents (politics
can be a blood sport, after all), but also the Constitution -- as Obama has
from almost day one of the One. Here are just a few examples of his
inclination to ignore our most sacred document: czars exercising power
without being approved by the Senate; violating the property clause by
ignoring bankruptcy law -- as he did with the auto bailouts and attempted to
do with mortgage "cram-down" plans; the chilling of free speech by threats
against Fox News and by bringing back the threat of regulation affecting
talk radio. Even health care reform has come under scrutiny for violating
the Constitution.



There is a cliché in Washington: that all one needs to know about politics
can be learned on the playground. But perhaps Obama's street-smart education
was learned on the basketball court -- where height reigns (and there is no
higher office in America), and where trash-talk is used to demoralize and
defeat.



A cynic wrapped in a hypocrite inside a bully.



*Ed Lasky is news editor of American Thinker.*



*Page Printed from:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/obamas_image_what_a_difference.html*at
December 29, 2009 - 11:09:33 PM EST

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to