We got 535 who I would like to see removed.  By any means necesssary is fine
with me.  And that shit in the wh too.

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:11 PM, plainolamerican
<[email protected]>wrote:

> we have enough agents to do the job
> we just need to stop the politicians from letting'em do their job
>
> politicians who hinder the capture and deportation of illegal
> immigrants should be removed from office asap by any means necessary
>
> On Jan 8, 1:36 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> >  http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54514
> >
> > *Administration Will Cut Border Patrol Deployed on U.S-Mexico Border*
> > *Thursday, September 24, 2009*
> > By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief
> >
> > [image:http://media.cnsnews.com/resources/54513.jpg]
> > *A U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer is seen from Mexico's side
> of
> > the San Ysidro port of entry guarding vehicles involved in a shooting in
> > Tijuana, Mexico, Sept. 22, 2009. Four people were injured in a gun battle
> > involving an attempt to smuggle illegal immigrants from Mexico at the
> > busiest border crossing in the U.S., authorities said. (AP
> Photo/Guillermo
> > Arias)*
> >
> > *(CNSNews.com)* - Even though the Border Patrol now reports that almost
> > 1,300 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border is not under effective control, and
> > the Department of Justice says that vast stretches of the border are
> “easily
> > breached,” and the Government Accountability Office has revealed that
> three
> > persons “linked to terrorism” and 530 aliens from “special interest
> > countries” were intercepted at Border Patrol checkpoints last year, the
> > administration is nonetheless now planning to decrease the number of
> Border
> > Patrol agents deployed on the U.S.-Mexico border.
> >
> > Border Patrol Director of Media Relations Lloyd Easterling confirmed this
> > week--as I first reported in *my
> > column*<http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/article/54412>yesterday--that
> > his agency is planning for a net decrease of 384 agents on
> > the U.S.-Mexico border in fiscal 2010, which begins on October 1.
> >
> > A Department of Homeland Security annual performance review updated by
> the
> > Obama administration on May 7 said the Border Patrol “plans to move
> several
> > hundred Agents from the Southwest Border to the Northern Border to meet
> the
> > FY 2010 staffing requirements, with only a small increase in new agents
> for
> > the Southwest Border in the same year.”
> >
> > Easterling said on Tuesday that in fiscal 2009, 17,399 Border Patrol
> agents
> > have been deployed on the U.S.-Mexico border. In fiscal year 2010, the
> > Border Patrol plans to decrease that by 384 agents, leaving 17,015
> deployed
> > along the Mexican frontier. At the same time, the number of Border Patrol
> > agents deployed on the U.S.-Canada border will be increased by 414, from
> a
> > fiscal 2009 total of 1,798 agents to a fiscal 2010 total of 2,212.
> >
> > The Border Patrol is responsible for securing a total of 8,607 miles of
> > border, including the U.S.-Mexico border, the U.S.-Canada border from
> > Washington state to Maine, and sectors of coastline in the Gulf of
> Mexico,
> > Florida, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
> >
> > Each year, the Border Patrol sets a goal for “border miles under
> effective
> > control (including certain coastal sectors).” “Effective control,” as
> > defined by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, means that when the Border
> > Patrol detects an illegal border crosser in a particular area of the
> border
> > the agency can be expected to succeed in apprehending that person.
> >
> > In the May 7 update of its *performance
> > review*<http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cfo_apr_fy2008.pdf>,
> > DHS said the Border Patrol’s goal for fiscal 2009 was to have 815 of the
> > 8,607 miles of border for which the agency is responsible under
> “effective
> > control.”  The review also said the Border Patrol’s goal for fiscal 2010
> was
> > to again have 815 miles of border under “effective control,” meaning DHS
> was
> > not planning to secure a single additional mile of border in the coming
> > year.
> >
> > However, Acting Deputy Assistant Customs and Border Protection
> Commissioner
> > Todd Owen *told a House
> > committee*<http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20090708190119.pdf>in
> > July that the Border Patrol already had 894 miles of border under
> > effective control as of May 31 of this year.  These 894 miles, Owen said,
> > included 697 miles on the Mexican border, 32 miles on the Canadian border
> > and 165 miles in the coastal sectors.
> >
> > Easterling said this week that as of now the Border Patrol still has the
> > same 894 miles of border under effective control that it had under
> effective
> > control as of May 31. He also said the agency would not relinquish
> control
> > of any of these miles in the coming year.  After the beginning of the new
> > fiscal year, he said, the Border Patrol would reevaluate the situation
> and
> > set a new goal for border miles under “effective control” for 2010 that
> > would at least equal, and might exceed, the 894 miles currently under
> > effective control.
> >
> > “The intention is to take back the border incrementally, and make gains
> that
> > we can keep,” Easterling said. “We do not intend, nor will we give back,
> > miles that we have gained control over.”
> >
> > Easterling said the Border Patrol would be able to maintain the current
> > number of miles under effective control on the Mexico border with fewer
> > agents deployed there thanks to “force multipliers,” including new
> fencing,
> > roads and other infrastructure that has been built in recent years. He
> also
> > cited the assistance the Border Patrol receives from local police and
> > sheriffs departments and community watch groups.
> >
> > But even if the Border Patrol is able to maintain or marginally improve
> on
> > the current level of security on the U.S.-Mexico border, most of the
> border
> > will remain effectively open to smuggling both contraband and persons.
> >
> > The entire U.S.-Mexico border is 1,954 miles long, according to the
> > *International
> > Boundary and Water Commission* <http://www.ibwc.state.gov/>. While 697
> of
> > those miles are now under “effective control,” according to the Border
> > Patrol, 1,257 miles are not under “effective control.”
> >
> > Reports from other government agencies paint a vivid picture of the
> massive
> > drug and alien smuggling that takes place in these uncontrolled expanses
> and
> > the national security problem created by unsecured border lands.
> >
> > Each year, the Justice Department’s *National Drug Intelligence
> > Center*<http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/>produces “drug market analyses” for
> > each of 32 regions of the country that
> > the NDIC describes as “high intensity drug trafficking areas.” Five of
> these
> > areas sit along the U.S.-Mexico border. These include the California
> border
> > region, Arizona, New Mexico, West Texas and South Texas. The latest
> reports,
> > released in March and April of this year, use candid language in
> portraying
> > the U.S.-Mexican frontier as wide open to drug smuggling and even
> vulnerable
> > to penetration by potential terrorists.
> >
> > The *California-Mexico
> > border*<http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs32/32765/index.htm>,
> > the NDIC said, was “easily breached” on both foot and in vehicles.
> >
> > “The vast border area presents innumerable remote crossing points that
> > traffickers exploit to smuggle illicit drugs, primarily marijuana, into
> the
> > country from Mexico,” said NDIC. “These areas are easily breached by
> > traffickers on foot, in private vehicles, or in all-terrain vehicles
> (ATVs)
> > as they smuggle drugs between POEs [ports of entry], particularly the
> > mountainous areas in eastern San Diego County and the desert and sand
> dune
> > areas in Imperial County.”
> >
> > Arizona’s border was judged to be open not only to drug smugglers but
> also
> > aliens with “extensive criminal records” and from “special interest
> > countries,” which are defined as “countries that could export individuals
> > who could bring harm to the United States through terrorism.”
> >
> > “Some criminal organizations smuggle aliens and gang members into the
> United
> > States,” said *NDIC’s
> > report*<http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs32/32762/index.htm>on Arizona.
> > “These particular individuals typically have extensive criminal
> > records and pose a threat, not only to the Arizona HIDTA [high intensity
> > drug trafficking area] region but also to communities throughout the
> United
> > States. Alien smuggling organizations reportedly also smuggle aliens from
> > countries other than Mexico, including special-interest countries.”
> >
> > “Special-interest countries are those designated by the intelligence
> > community as countries that could export individuals who could bring harm
> to
> > the United States through terrorism,” said the NDIC report.
> >
> > The NDIC described the Arizona-Mexico border as “largely underprotected”
> in
> > the areas between official ports of entry.
> >
> > “Large amounts of illicit drugs are smuggled into the area from Mexico,
> and
> > bulk cash is transported from the area into Mexico,” said NDIC. “These
> > trafficking activities are facilitated by several factors unique to the
> > region, including the continuing economic and population growth in
> Arizona’s
> > two primary drug markets (Phoenix and Tucson), the highways that connect
> > major metropolitan areas in Arizona with major illicit drug source areas
> in
> > Mexico, and a remote, largely underprotected border area between
> Arizona’s
> > ports of entry (POEs).
> >
> > “Vast stretches of remote, sparsely populated border areas are located
> > within the HIDTA region; these areas are especially conducive to
> large-scale
> > drug smuggling,” said NDIC. “By the end of January 2009, 108 miles of the
> > 262-mile shared border between Arizona and Mexico will have some type of
> > fencing. However, few physical barriers exist in border areas between
> POEs,
> > particularly in the West Desert area of the U.S. Border Patrol (USBP)
> Tucson
> > Sector, to impede drug traffickers, chiefly Mexican DTOs, from smuggling
> > illicit drug shipments into the United States from Mexico.”
> >
> > Part of the *New Mexico
> > border*<http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs32/32779/index.htm>was described
> > as “an ideal smuggling corridor.”
> >
> > “Southwestern New Mexico—specifically Hidalgo, Luna, and Dona Ana
> > Counties—shares a 180-mile border with Mexico,” said NDIC. “More than
> half
> > the length of this border is desolate public land that contains
> innumerable
> > footpaths, roads, and trails. Additionally, many ranches are located
> along
> > the border. These factors and minimal law enforcement coverage make the
> area
> > an ideal smuggling corridor for drugs and other illicit goods and
> services—
> > primarily alien smuggling into the United States and weapons and bulk
> cash
> > smuggling into Mexico. Mexican DTOs smuggle multihundred-kilogram
> quantities
> > of illicit drugs through this portion of the HIDTA region annually.”
> >
> > Like the California border, the *South Texas
> > border*<http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs32/32791/index.htm>is also
> > “easily breached,” according to the NDIC.
> >
> > “The combination of vast stretches of remote, sparsely populated land and
> > extensive crossborder economic activity at designated ports of entry
> (POEs)
> > creates an environment conducive to large-scale drug smuggling,” said
> NDIC.
> > “Few physical barriers exist between POEs to impede drug traffickers,
> > particularly Mexican DTOs, from smuggling illicit drug shipments into the
> > United States from Mexico. Along many areas of the U.S.-Mexico border in
> > South Texas, the Rio Grande River can be easily breached by smugglers on
> > foot or in vehicles, enabling Mexican DTOs to smuggle multikilogram
> > quantities of illicit drugs, primarily marijuana and cocaine, into the
> > United States.”
> >
> > In the *West Texas sector*<
> http://www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs32/32792/index.htm>,
> > the NDIC again raised the possibility that terrorists could exploit the
> > border to enter the country.
> >
> > “Moreover, the region’s location along the U.S.-Mexico border poses
> national
> > security and law enforcement issues for the region, such as alien
> smuggling,
> > weapons transportation, and terrorist entry into the United States
> through
> > and between ports of entry,” said NDIC.
> >
> > While the U.S. government may be failing to exert effective control over
> > most of the border, identical language in the NDIC reports for Arizona
> and
> > West Texas said that drug trafficking organizations have set up
> “gatekeeper”
> > operations that control smuggling into the U.S. and levy taxes on the
> > smugglers they let through.
> >
> > “Gatekeepers regulate the drug flow from Mexico across the U.S.-Mexico
> > border into the United States by controlling drug smugglers’ access to
> areas
> > along the border,” said the Arizona and West Texas NDIC reports.
> > “Gatekeepers collect ‘taxes’ from smugglers on all illicit shipments that
> > are moved through these areas, including drugs and illegal aliens. The
> taxes
> > are generally paid to the DTO that controls the area; the DTO then
> launders
> > the tax proceeds. Gatekeepers sometimes resort to extortion,
> intimidation,
> > and acts of violence to collect taxes from smugglers. Gatekeepers also
> > reportedly bribe corrupt Mexican police and military personnel in order
> to
> > ensure that smuggling activities occur without interruption.”
> >
> > “Gatekeepers generally operate at the behest of a Mexican drug
> trafficking
> > organization (DTO) and enforce the will of the organization through
> bribery,
> > intimidation, extortion, beatings, and murder,” said the reports.
> >
> > A *Government Accountability Office
> > report*<http://www.gao.gov/htext/d09824.html>released on August 31
> > pointed out that the Border Patrol’s top priority is
> > to stop terrorists and weapons of mass destruction from entering the
> United
> > States and revealed that three person’s “linked to terrorism” and
> hundreds
> > of aliens from “special interest countries” were intercepted at Border
> > Patrol checkpoints in fiscal 2008. These checkpoints, which act as a
> final
> > line of defense for the U.S. border, are typically set up on highways 25
> to
> > 100 miles north of the Mexican border.
> >
> > “CBP reported that in fiscal year 2008, there were three individuals
> > encountered by the Border Patrol at southwest border checkpoints who were
> > identified as persons linked to terrorism,” said GAO.
> >
> > “In addition, the Border Patrol reported that in fiscal year 2008
> > checkpoints encountered 530 aliens from special interest countries, which
> > are countries the Department of State has determined to represent a
> > potential terrorist threat to the United States,” said GAO. “While people
> > from these countries may not have any ties to illegal or terrorist
> > activities, Border Patrol agents detain aliens from special interest
> > countries if they are in the United States illegally and Border Patrol
> > agents report these encounters to the local Sector Intelligence Agent,
> the
> > Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Joint Terrorism Task Force, U.S.
> > Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Office of Investigations, and
> the
> > CBP National Targeting Center.”
> >
> > The GAO also said one illegal alien detained in West Texas had come from
> > Iran.
> >
> > “For example,” said GAO, “according to a Border Patrol official in the El
> > Paso sector, a checkpoint stopped a vehicle and questioned its three
> Iranian
> > occupants, determining that one of those occupants was in the United
> States
> > illegally. The individual was detained and turned over to U.S.
> Immigration
> > and Customs Enforcement for further questioning.”
> >
> > There has been much discussion in the past week about whether President
> > Barack Obama will heed the advice of Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the U.S.
> > commander in Afghanistan, to increase the U.S. troop deployment there.
>  The
> > administration, however, has already decided to decrease by 384 the
> Border
> > Patrol agents deployed on our own southern frontier
> >
> >  image001.jpg
> > 20KViewDownload
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at 
> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to