On February 11th, President Barack Obama stood on a windy hilltop in front
of a dusty construction site in Fairfax County, Virginia, and promised the
American 
people<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810919:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>:
"Here in Virginia, my plan will create or save almost 100,000 jobs, doing
work at sites just like this one." Standing alongside current Democratic
National Committee Chairman and former-Gov. Tim Kaine, the President
continued: "Where we're standing, that could mean hundreds of construction
jobs. And the benefits of jobs we create directly will multiply across the
economy." Eleven months later, none of those promised jobs have been
"created or saved." In fact, the Obama administration quietly
announced<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810920:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>last
week that they were dropping the fraudulent "saved or created"
terminology altogether.

The failure of Obama's $787 billion stimulus is particularly acute in
Virginia where, as Heritage fellow Ron Utt has
documented<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810921:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>,
despite $695 million in allocated infrastructure funding, only 16% of
designated projects had begun. House Transportation and Infrastructure
Committee Chairman James Oberstar (D-MN) even publicly complained about
Virginia's slow transportation spending, writing to Gov. Kaine: "your state
ranks last among all states [51 out of 51, including the District of
Columbia], based on an analysis of the percentage of Recovery Act highway
formula funds put out to bid, under contract and under way."

But even where infrastructure spending has been spent, the hard evidence
shows that there has not been any positive effect on unemployment. According
to an Associated Press
analysis<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810922:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>reviewed
by independent economists at five universities, the $20 billion
spent nationwide on infrastructure so far "has had no effect on local
unemployment rates." And this was just the most recent embarrassing headline
for the White House's signature economic policy. Since the first reporting
deadline in October, newspapers and other media outlets across the country
have identified 94,341 fake jobs reported by the Obama administration as
jobs "created or saved" by the stimulus. After the Government Accountability
Office issued a
report<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810923:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>finding
"significant reporting and processing problems that need to be
addressed," Obama administration spokesman Ed Pound
offered<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810924:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>this
defense of the Obama administration's jobs numbers: "Who knows, man,
who really knows."

Now Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag issued a
little-noticed
memo<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810925:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>last
month ending the "saved or created" metric and instead directing
agencies to count only jobs "funded" by stimulus dollars. But as Harvard
University labor economist Lawrence Katz tells
ProPublica<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810920:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>,
this is not really an improvement: "I just think it’s a silly exercise."
Instead Katz 
says<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810920:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>a
more accurate way to account for the effect of the stimulus is to look
at
the unemployment numbers put out by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

That is a great
idea<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810926:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>.
The latest BLS 
report<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810927:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>issued
last Friday found that the U.S. economy dropped 85,000 jobs in
December, bringing the jobs lost total to 2.7 million since the stimulus was
passed and 3.4 million since Obama became
President<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810928:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>.
In contrast, the President's White House Council of Economic Advisers had
promised total employment of at least 138.6 million by 2010. Actual
employment as of December was reported to be 130.9 million, leaving the
Obama jobs deficit at 7.7
million<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810928:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>
.

The problem with infrastructure spending as stimulus, and really government
spending as stimulus, is that Congress does not have a vault of money
waiting to be distributed. Every dollar Congress injects into the economy
must first be taxed or borrowed out of the economy. No new spending power is
created. It is merely redistributed from one group of people to another.
Businesses are telling
pollsters<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810929:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>that
among the biggest reasons they are not creating jobs is the prospect
of
new tax and regulatory burdens. A better
solution<http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/ct/3810930:5593235494:m:1:147140772:F29FEF349B4B326E2BEB201997E14C15>to
reduce unemployment is to simplify and reduce the barriers to business
success.
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to