ECONOMIC VIEW
Fruitful Decade for Many in the World

   - SIGN IN TO RECOMMEND
   - TWITTER
   - SIGN IN TO
E-MAIL<http://www.nytimes.com/auth/login?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/business/economy/03view.html>
   - 
PRINT<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/business/economy/03view.html?ref=business&pagewanted=print>
   
<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/business/economy/03view.html?ref=business&pagewanted=all>
   - 
REPRINTS<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/business/economy/03view.html?ref=business#>
   - 
SHARE<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/business/economy/03view.html?ref=business#>
   
CLOSE<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/business/economy/03view.html?ref=business#>

<http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/business/economy&pos=Frame4A&sn2=fb3898ea/b6bbdaf2&sn1=c151f81a/917796eb&camp=foxsearch2010_emailtools_1225553c_nyt5&ad=CrazyHearts_120x60_Globes_c&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Fcrazyheart>
By TYLER COWEN
Published: January 2, 2010

IT may not feel that way right now, but the last 10 years may go down in
world history as a big success. That idea may be hard to accept in the
United States. After all, it was the decade of 9/11, the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan, and the financial crisis, all dramatic and painful events. But
in economic terms, at least, the decade was a remarkably good one for many
people around the globe.
 Enlarge This Image
 David G. Klein

The raging economic growth rates of China and India are well known, though
their rise is part of a broader trend in the economic development of poorer
countries. Ideals of prosperity, freedom and the rule of law have probably
never been more resonant globally than they’ve been over the last 10 years,
even if practice often falls short. And for all of the anticapitalistic
rhetoric that has emerged from the financial crisis, national leaders around
the world are embracing the commercialization of their economies.

Putting aside the United States, which ranks third, the four most populous
countries are 
China<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/china/index.html?inline=nyt-geo>
, 
India<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/india/index.html?inline=nyt-geo>
, 
Indonesia<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/indonesia/index.html?inline=nyt-geo>
 
andBrazil<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/brazil/index.html?inline=nyt-geo>,
accounting for more than 40 percent of the world’s people. And all four have
made great strides. Indonesia had solid economic growth during the entire
decade, mostly in the 5 to 6 percent annual range. That came after its very
turbulent 1990s, marked by a disastrous financial crisis and plummeting
standards of living.

Brazil also had a consistently good decade, with growth at times exceeding 5
percent a year. There is lots of talk that the country has finally turned
the corner, and, within its borders, there is major worry that its currency
is too strong — a problem that many other countries would envy.

Elsewhere in South America, Colombia and Peru have made enormous progress
and Chile is on the verge of becoming a “developed” country; it will soon be
joining the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development<http://www.oecd.org/home/0,2987,en_2649_201185_1_1_1_1_1,00.html>
.

To be sure, in Africa, there is still enormous misery. Nonetheless, overall
standards of living rose in a wide variety of countries there, with economic
growth for the continent as a whole at more than 5 percent in most years.
Many basic essentials, like water, sanitation, electricity and especially
telephones, are more commonly available.

One lesson from all of this is that steady economic growth is an
underreported news story — and to our own detriment. As human beings, we are
prone to focus on very dramatic, visible events, such as confrontations with
political enemies or the personal qualities of leaders, whether good or bad.
We turn information about politics and economics into stories of good guys
versus bad guys and identify progress with the triumph of the good guys. In
the process, it’s easy to neglect the underlying forces that improve life in
small, hard-to-observe ways, culminating in important changes.

In a given year, an extra percentage point of economic growth may not seem
to matter much. But, over time, the difference between annual growth of 1
percent and 2 percent determines whether you can double your standard of
living every 35 years or every 70 years. At 5 percent annual economic
growth, living standards double about every 14 years.

Nonetheless, despite the positive news in much of the world, it’s
questionable whether the decade as a whole has been good for Americans,
economically speaking. Median wages have not risen much, if at all, and the
costs of the financial crisis and irresponsible fiscal policies have become
increasingly obvious. Those facts support a pessimistic interpretation.

Still, most economic models suggest that the fundamental source of growth is
new ideas, which enable us to produce more from a given set of resources. To
the extent that the rest of the world becomes wealthier, there’s more
innovation, as my colleague and co-blogger Alex Tabarrok, professor of
economics at George Mason University, argued
recently<http://www.ted.com/talks/alex_tabarrok_foresees_economic_growth.html>.
China, for instance, is moving toward the research frontier in areas such
as solar 
power<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/solar_energy/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>,
scientific instruments, engineering and nanoscience, all of which can
benefit the United States. Unlike the situation of just a few decades ago, a
genius born in Mumbai now stands a good chance of becoming a notable
scientist, whether at home or abroad.

It might be pleasant to boast that America is — or should be — a world
leader in every area, but the practical reality is that if some other
country solves the problem of green energy, so much the better for us.

The subtler point is that a wealthier China, India, Brazil and Indonesia
will lead to more customers for new innovations, thereby producing greater
rewards for successful entrepreneurs, no matter where they live. There are
so many improvements in cellphones these days because there are so many
cellphone customers in so many countries.

TO put it bluntly, if the United States takes one step back and the rest of
the world takes two steps forward, even in purely selfish terms we should
consider accepting the trade-off, if only for the longer run. Most of us
gain from the wealth and creativity of other countries, even if we can’t
always feel like the top dog.

When asked what he thought of the French Revolution, Zhou Enlai, the premier
of China from 1949 until his death in 1976, reportedly replied, “It is too
soon to tell.”

That is also a fair response to the last 10 years, and it will be for some
time to come. The point remains that if we look beneath the surface just a
bit, the picture is a good deal rosier than we might otherwise think.

Tyler Cowen is a professor of economics at George Mason University.

 __._,_.___
  Reply to sender <[email protected]?subject=world+economy> | Reply to
group <[email protected]?subject=world+economy>
Messages in this
topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stillnotjustmusicanymore/message/45370;_ylc=X3oDMTM3azNpNzhvBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzNDE4MTAwBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTAyMzUyNARtc2dJZAM0NTM3MARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawN2dHBjBHN0aW1lAzEyNjM1NTU4ODAEdHBjSWQDNDUzNzA->(
1)
 Recent Activity:


 Visit Your 
Group<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stillnotjustmusicanymore;_ylc=X3oDMTJmOHNoMGliBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzNDE4MTAwBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTAyMzUyNARzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEyNjM1NTU4ODA->
Start
a New 
Topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stillnotjustmusicanymore/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmazl1dW04BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzNDE4MTAwBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTAyMzUyNARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0aW1lAzEyNjM1NTU4ODA->
 Please follow Yahoogroups TOS http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message
is distributed under fair use without profit or payment
For non-profit research and educational or criticism purposes only.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Music we send is from our personal collections.
We are sharing it with you for your listening pleasure.
Please support the Artists by purchasing their albums.
 MARKETPLACE

Going Green: Your Yahoo! Groups resource for green
living<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=14kan4frb/M=493064.13814333.13821539.13298430/D=grplch/S=1705023524:MKP1/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1263563080/L=/B=5oBgFkPDhFc-/J=1263555880975044/K=rFboMV_6QDga8VxT8bWijA/A=5922843/R=0/SIG=11ckn2mo6/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/green/>
  [image: Yahoo!
Groups]<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNDU3NGZkBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIzNDE4MTAwBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTAyMzUyNARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTI2MzU1NTg4MA-->
Switch to: 
Text-Only<[email protected]?subject=change+delivery+format:+Traditional>,
Daily 
Digest<[email protected]?subject=email+delivery:+Digest>•
Unsubscribe<[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>•
Terms
of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
   .

__,_._,___
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to