http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/20/AR2010012002073.html?wpisrc=nl_opinions

By George F. Will
Thursday, January 21, 2010

"We are on the precipice of an achievement that's eluded Congresses and
presidents for generations."

-- President Barack Obama, Dec. 15, on health-care legislation

Precipice, 1. a headlong fall or descent, esp. to a great depth.

-- Oxford English Dictionary

Trying to guarantee Americans the thrill of the precipice, the president
dashed to Massachusetts on Sunday, thereby conceding that he had already
lost Tuesday's Senate election, which had become a referendum on his
signature program. By promising to cast the decisive 41st vote against the
president's health-care legislation, the Republican candidate forced all
congressional Democrats to contemplate this: Not even frenzied national
mobilization of Democratic manpower and millions of dollars could rescue one
of the safest Democratic seats in the national legislature from national
dismay about the incontinent government expansion, of which that legislation
is symptomatic.

Because the legislation is frightening and unpopular, Democrats have had to
resort to serial bribery to advance it. Massachusetts voted immediately
after the corruption of exempting, until 2018, union members from the tax on
high-value health insurance plans. This tax was supposedly the crucial
component of what supposedly was reform's primary goal: reducing costs.

The late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-N.Y.) thought Bill Clinton's
presidency was crippled by the 1993 decision to pursue health-care reform
rather than welfare reform. So slight was public enthusiasm for the former
that Clinton's program never even came to a vote in the House or Senate,
both controlled by Democrats. There was such fervor for welfare reform that
in 1996, after two Clinton vetoes, he finally signed the decade's most
important legislation.

In their joyless, tawdry slog toward passage of their increasingly ludicrous
bill, Democrats now cling grimly to Robert Frost's axiom that "the best way
out is always through." Their sole remaining reason for completing the damn
thing is that they started it. The Democrats seem to have convinced
themselves that they lost control of Congress in 1994 because they did not
pass an unpopular health bill in 1993. Actually, their 1994 debacle had more
to do with the arrogance and malfeasance arising from 40 years of control of
the House of Representatives (e.g., the House banking scandal), a
provocative crime bill (gun control, federal subsidies for midnight
basketball) and other matters.

With one piece of legislation, President Obama and his congressional allies
have done in one year what it took President Lyndon Johnson and his allies
two years to do in 1965 and 1966 -- revive conservatism. Today, conservatism
is rising on the steppingstones of liberal excesses.

Between FDR's reprimand by voters in the 1938 midterm congressional
elections (partly because of his anti-constitutional plan to enlarge and
pack the Supreme Court) and LBJ's 1964 trouncing of Barry Goldwater, there
was no liberal legislating majority in Congress: Republicans and
conservative Democrats combined to temper liberalism's itch to overreach. In
1965 and 1966, however, liberalism was rampant. Today, Democrats worrying
about a reprise of 1994 should worry more about a rerun of the 1966 midterm
elections, which began a Republican resurgence that presaged victories in
seven of the next 10 presidential elections.

The 2008 elections gave liberals the curse of opportunity, and they have
used it to reveal themselves ruinously. The protracted health-care debacle
has highlighted this fact: Some liberals consider the legislation's
unpopularity a reason to redouble their efforts to inflict it on Americans
who, such liberals think, are too benighted to understand that their betters
know best. The essence of contemporary liberalism is the illiberal
conviction that Americans, in their comprehensive incompetence, need minute
supervision by government, which liberals believe exists to spare citizens
the torture of thinking and choosing.

Last week, trying to buttress the bovine obedience of most House Democrats,
Obama assured them that if the bill becomes law, "the American people will
suddenly learn that this bill does things they like." Suddenly?

If the Democrats' congressional leaders are determined to continue their
kamikaze flight to incineration, they will ignore Massachusetts's redundant
evidence of public disgust. They will leaven their strategy of briberies
with procedural cynicism -- delaying certification of Massachusetts's Senate
choice, or misusing "reconciliation" to evade Senate rules, or forcing the
House to swallow its last shred of pride in order to rush the Senate bill to
the president's desk. Surely any such trickery would be one brick over a
load for some hitherto servile members of the Democratic House and Senate
caucuses, giving them an excuse to halt their party's Gadarene rush toward
the precipice.

[email protected] <georgewill%40washpost.com>

 __._,_.___
  Reply to 
sender<[email protected]?subject=george+f.+will+-+democrats+on+the+precipice+of+failure+-+washingtonpost.com>|
Reply
to 
group<[email protected]?subject=george+f.+will+-+democrats+on+the+precipice+of+failure+-+washingtonpost.com>
Messages in this
topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CampaignForLiberty/message/7089;_ylc=X3oDMTM1ZGw2azlyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzMjA4ODE0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MDM3NgRtc2dJZAM3MDg5BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTI2NDE2MTYzNgR0cGNJZAM3MDg5>(
1)
 Recent Activity:


 Visit Your 
Group<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CampaignForLiberty;_ylc=X3oDMTJmNTljbnM4BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzMjA4ODE0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MDM3NgRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEyNjQxNjE2MzY->
Start
a New 
Topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CampaignForLiberty/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZzFnZTlwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzMjA4ODE0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MDM3NgRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0aW1lAzEyNjQxNjE2MzY->
 Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may
cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.
John Quincy Adams
 MARKETPLACE

Going Green: Your Yahoo! Groups resource for green
living<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=14kuhsjg4/M=493064.13814333.13821539.13298430/D=groups/S=1705060376:MKP1/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1264168837/L=/B=O0FEG0SO5.8-/J=1264161637288882/K=84OmAAO6nXYSBseK907eDQ/A=5922843/R=0/SIG=11ckn2mo6/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/green/>
  [image: Yahoo!
Groups]<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlczdrbmQwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzMjA4ODE0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MDM3NgRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTI2NDE2MTYzNg-->
Switch to: 
Text-Only<[email protected]?subject=change+delivery+format:+Traditional>,
Daily 
Digest<[email protected]?subject=email+delivery:+Digest>•
Unsubscribe<[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>•
Terms
of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
   .

__,_._,___

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to