On Jan 24, 8:37 pm, Irie <[email protected]> wrote: > Because there was no indication of fraud...unlike when a democRAT is > in a close race....ie
Of course there's no indication when they won. Fraud apparently doesn't exist under such circumstances. > Because there was no indication of fraud, unlike in Mn. Or in Florida with Bush Jr.? THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote: > The majority of voters in Mass. are neither Dems or Reps. they are independent..... as it should be with the entire nation if you idiots would wake up. Those same Independents sent Obama a message that he needs to do something besides coddle Republicans. Those same Independents will throw Scott out when he doesn't deliver anything other than "no". And in all fairness, they will throw Obama out if he continues to hold America hostage over trying to gain support with Republicans and a couple Democrats. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
