If nuclear arms are outlawed, only criminals will have them. Wasn't it Bush Jr. that wanted new ones, while Obama is the one trying to cut them back?
So who is the criminal? On Feb 1, 11:07 pm, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 31, 9:31 am, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Bill of Rights 2nd Amendment - A well regulated Militia, being > > necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to > > keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed... > > Isn't a nuclear arm, an arm? > Agree, or disagree? > > They even make nuclear rifles...well, they used to anyway. > > I somehow doubt that the world would be a safer, better place if > people were allowed to have nuclear arms. > Agree, or disagree? -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
