*Robert Samuelson Is Getting Exasperated With Obama: *Samuelson shows that exasperation in this column <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/14/AR2010031401389.html>, where Samuelson accuses Obama of peddling simplicities and distortions.

Samuelson ends with these three paragraphs:

   Unless we change the fee-for-service system, costs will remain hard
   to control because providers are paid more for doing more.  Obama
   might have attempted that by proposing health-care vouchers (limited
   amounts to be spent on insurance), which would force a restructuring
   of delivery systems to compete on quality and cost.   Doctors,
   hospitals and drug companies would have to reorganize care.  Obama
   refrained from that fight and instead cast insurance companies as
   the villains.

   He's telling people what they want to hear, not what they need to
   know.  Whatever their sins, insurers are mainly intermediaries; they
   pass along the costs of the delivery system.  In 2009, the largest
   14 insurers had profits of roughly $9 billion; that approached 0.4
   percent of total health spending of $2.472 trillion.  This hardly
   explains high health costs.  What people need to know is that
   Obama's plan evades health care's major problems and would worsen
   the budget outlook.  It's a big new spending program when government
   hasn't paid for the spending programs it already has.

   "If not now, when?  If not us, who?"  Obama asks.  The answer is:
   It's not now, and it's not "us."  Pass or not, Obama's proposal is
the illusion of "reform," not the real thing. And the provisions that Pelosi and company are cooking up in secret may make it even worse.

(Samuelson's colleague at the Post, Fred Hiatt, should study this column to see if he can find any evidence that Obama has formulated a rational solution to our complex problems of health insurance.) - 10:34 AM, 16 March 2010 [link] <http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/March2010_2.html#jrm8486>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to