http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/tea-245567-comedy-clinton.html

Steyn: Tea Party the new front in 'war on terror'
By MARK STEYN


I suppose the thinking runs something like this. All things
considered, the polls on Obamacare aren't totally disastrous, and the
president's approval numbers seem to have bottomed out in the low
forties, and when you look at what that means in terms of the
electoral map this November, you've only got to scare a relatively
small percentage of squishy suburban moderate centrists back into the
Democratic fold, and how difficult can that be?

Hence, Bill Clinton energetically on the stump, summoning all his
elder statesman's dignity (please, no giggling) in the cause of
comparing Tea Partiers to Timothy McVeigh. Oh, c'mon, they've got
everything in common. They both want to reduce the size of government,
the late Mr. McVeigh through the use of fertilizer bombs, the Tea
Partiers through control of federal spending, but these are mere
nuanced differences of means, not ends. Also, both "Tim" and "Tea" are
three-letter words beginning with "T": Picture him upon your knee,
just Tea for Tim and Tim for Tea, you're for him and he's for thee,
completely interchangeable.

To lend the point more gravitas, President Clinton packed his reading
glasses and affected his scholarly look, with the spectacles pushed
down toward the end of his nose, as if he's trying to determine
whether that's his 10 a.m. intern shuffling toward him across the
broadloom or a rabid armadillo Al Gore brought along for the Earth Day
photo op.

Will it work? For a long time, Tea Partiers were racists. Everybody
knows that when you say "I'm becoming very concerned about
unsustainable levels of federal spending" that that's old Jim Crow
code for "Let's get up a lynching party and teach that uppity Negro a
lesson." Frank Rich of The New York Times attempted to diversify the
Tea Party racism into homophobia by arguing that Obamacare opponents
were uncomfortable with Barney Frank's sexuality. I yield to no one in
my discomfort with Barney Frank's sexuality but, with the best will in
the world, I find it hard to blame it for more than the first four or
five trillion dollars of federal overspending. Eschewing such cheap
slurs, Time's Joe Klein said opposition to Obama was "seditious,"
because nothing says sedition like citing the U.S. Constitution and
quoting Thomas Jefferson. Unfortunately for Klein, thanks to
"educator" William Ayers' education reforms, nobody knows what
"seditious" means anymore.

So enough with all the punch-pulling about seditious racist homophobes.

It was time to go for broke, and bring out Bill Clinton to explain why
the Tea Party is the new front in the "war on terror." Don't worry
about Iran's nuclear program, but , if you meet a Tea Party supporter
waving some placard about the national debt, try not to catch his eye
and back away slowly without making any sudden movements lest he put
down his placard and light up his suicide belt.

As longtime readers know, I have enormous respect for the Democrats as
masters of the politics of personal destruction. What a track record!

"Bushitler" ... "General Betray-Us" ... Excellent stuff, up there with
Oscar Wilde. But this is, like, a whole new level: Bill Clinton is on
the road, demonizing (and with an impressively straight face) half the
American people as the express lane to ka-boom! And the poodle media
are taking it seriously.

Meanwhile, Comedy Central – you know, the "hip" "edgy" network with
Jon Stewart from whom "young" Americans under 53 supposedly get most
of their news – just caved in to death threats. From a hateful
83-year-old widow who doesn't like Obamacare? Why, no! It was a chap
called Abu Talhah al Amrikee, who put up a video on the Internet
explaining why a "South Park" episode with a rather tame Mohammed joke
was likely to lead to the deaths of the show's creators. Just to
underline the point, he showed some pictures of Theo van Gogh, the
Dutch film director brutally murdered by (oh, my, talk about
unfortunate coincidences) a fellow called Mohammed. Mr. al Amrikee
helpfully explained that his video incitement of the murder of Matt
Stone and Trey Parker wasn't really "a threat but just the likely
outcome." All he was doing, he added, was "raising awareness" – you
know, like folks do on Earth Day. On Earth Day, lame politicians dig a
hole and stick a tree in it. But aggrieved Muslims dig a hole and
stick a couple of comedy writers in it. Celebrate diversity!

Faced with this explicit threat of violence, what did Comedy Central do?

Why, they folded like a Bedouin tent. They censored "South Park," not
only cutting all the references to Mohammed but, in an exquisitely
post-modern touch, also removing the final speech about the need to
stand up to intimidation. Stone & Parker get what was at stake in the
Danish cartoons crisis, and many other ostensibly footling
concessions: Imperceptibly, incrementally, remorselessly, the free
world is sending the message that it is happy to trade core liberties
for the transitory security of a quiet life. That is a dangerous
signal to give freedom's enemies. So the "South Park" episode is an
important cultural pushback.

Yet in the end, in a craven culture, even big Hollywood A-listers
can't get their message over. So the brave, transgressive comedy
network was intimidated into caving in and censoring a speech about
not being intimidated into caving in. That's what I call "hip" "edgy"
"cutting-edge" comedy: They're so edgy they're curled up in the fetal
position, whimpering at the guy with the cutting edge, "Please. Behead
me last. And don't use the rusty scimitar where you have to saw away
for 20 minutes to find the spinal column."

Terrific. You can see why young, urban, post-modern Americans under 57
get most of their news from Comedy Central. What a shame 1930s Fascist
Europe was so lacking in cable.

Fifteen years ago, Bill Clinton set out to hang Timothy McVeigh around
the necks of talk radio and, with a further stretch, Newt and the
congressional Republicans. It was an act of contemptible but
undeniably brilliant opportunism. It worked out so well for him, that
a couple of years later, after the Princess of Wales' fatal car crash,
George Stephanopoulos enthused to Christopher Hitchens: "Tony Blair's
handling this really well. This is his Oklahoma City." As Hitchens
remarked, this is the way these people think.

Which works fine when you're up against phantom enemies of the kind
Clinton preferred to take on, while giving real threats the run of the
planet. If the Tea Partiers were truly the murderous goons they've
been portrayed as, they would draw the obvious lesson from the kid
gloves with which Comedy Central strokes Islam. They would say,
"Enough with peaceful rallies where we pick up the litter afterwards.
Let's just threaten to decapitate someone. You get more respect that
way. At least from the media."

But they won't do that. Because, notwithstanding their outrageous
demonization by the media, they're not terrorists. So, in the end,
Comedy Central has incentivized Islamic violence and nothing much
else.

Nevertheless, we should be grateful to its jelly-spined executives for
reminding us that the cardboard heroes of the American media are your
go-to guys for standing up to entirely fictitious threats. But for
real ones? Not so much.


------------------------------------

Report any problems, suggestions or abuse to
[email protected]

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Individual-Sovereignty/

<*> Your email settings:
   Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Individual-Sovereignty/join
   (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
   [email protected]
   [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
   http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to